Scoop Feedback: Boris Karpichkov Replies to TVNZ's Sunday
Dear Sir/Madame,
My name is Boris Karpichkov. I was a subject of The Sunday TV NZ One program story headlined “Spy Alert. A former KGB officer in NZ. What is his mission here?” shown on the National TV Channel One, on 14th October 2007, also briefly reported by the Sunday Star Times, headlined “KGB man came into NZ on false passport”, on 14th October 2007.
In the light of revelations made by the director of the NZ SIS, Mr Warren Tucker (regarding the matter that SIS, allegedly, was aware about me before my arrival on NZ soil and that, thereafter, they so zealously watched me all the time since then), I would like to ask publicly the director of the NZ SIS, was it exactly the NZ SIS employees who were responsible in two attempts of taking me out “of the circulation”, who acted closely together with Russian security service, FSB, in New Zealand, in the city of Auckland, in November 2006 and in March 2007?!?
And, if it was the case, I would like to find who exactly I should blame and address my enquiries to, regarding still ongoing severe deterioration of my health conditions? At least, maybe, the director of NZ SIS can give me any indication and clue as to what kind of “healing substance” was “tested” on me during both occasions? As well as what anti-dot I should start taking after I have received such “a sympathetic care” at the hands of NZ SIS?
From another point of view, I still have no a single idea what was the purpose of such strict “watching”, in my opinion, absolutely baseless “course of action”, which in better way could be described as natural persecution me for nothing? In the latter instance I would also like publicly ask the director of the NZ SIS how much money (in the light of Mr Tucker’s confession that they “watched” me since my arrival to NZ) of the NZ taxpayers were naturally “thrown on the wind” (I guess, not thousands but hundreds of thousands!!!) for this so-called “secret operative work”, which from my personal view has much more specific description – typical masturbation, and nothing else!!!
Furthermore, if continue to follow up the above “line”, such a “treatment” which I had received at the hands of the NZ “authorities” during all the time of my stay in NZ, unquestionably, amounted gross violation of the Convention against Torture, which NZ government is subject of signature and obliged to carry out, according with the international law. Obviously, for “some reason”, this was not the matter in my “clinical case”. In the latter instance I would be glad to hear why?!?
By the way, it would be very interesting and “entertaining” to hear another “portion” of lie and “twists” which NZ “geniuses” (the same SIS as well as immigration “authorities”) will use to reply on first lies, which they already told and publicly admitted (seemingly, they already becoming like this funny fair-tale character – Pinocchio whose nose becoming longer each time when he was lying).
Furthermore, there would be another angle of the same story and, therefore, of my public enquiries to the NZ officials. Specifically, I would like to ask the NZ government as to how it could happen (seemingly, for some “human reason”, this “insignificant” matter was also left abandoned by too “overloaded” by their own “self-importance” NZ “authorities”) there should also be taken account such “an issue” that since my arrival to NZ (in June 2006) and until my departure (in October 2007), during all the time, I was a subject of application for asylum in NZ. In the latter instance the logic question would arise, if the NZ SIS were aware and so “passionately watched” me since the beginning, how it was supposed to be “independent”, “fair” and “non-biased” treatment and judgement in my application for refugee and state protection to be carried out by NZ “independent authorities” (i.e., by Refugee Status Branch, in first instance and, subsequently, by the Refugee Status Appeals Authority, RSAA)?
And what about such again, obviously, “insignificant” notions in my “clinical case”, as observation of human rights and civil liberties, as defined by the Geneva Refugee Convention of 1951?!? This is another question to so self-proud about themselves and their “immaculate reputation” NZ immigration “authorities”, particularly, to Mr Roger Hanes QC, who supposed to be the “senior fair judge” in my refugee appeal?
By the way, just for public information, according my best knowledge, so-called “non-biased” hearings regarding my refugee appeal were the longest in the history of New Zealand immigration law and were lasted almost a month period of time – pathetically trying to find any inconsistency in my application and my testimony, they cunningly interrogated me on the “row basis” during three weeks and despite of then still ongoing severe deterioration of my health conditions – it was really some “piece of art”, “bright example of humanity and democracy” of New Zealand society which, by the way, was compared with quite sophisticated forms of psychological and physical torture.
In the latter instance I just was wondering to ask and to hear what kind of further lies all these NZ “authorities” would continue to tell to public with intention to effectively cover up all their degrading “actions” which they carried out against me during all this time (in accordance with admitting, by the SIS director, Mr Tucker, that I was a subject of “watching” and, as it appeared, even physical assault, of the NZ security services)?!?
I would be grateful to hear my enquiries to be publicly asked and addressed to the mentioned above NZ officials?
Yours faithfully,
Boris Karpichkov
ENDS