Tertiary Education Strategy Discussion Document
Tertiary Education Strategy Discussion Document
Questions and Answers
What's the purpose of the document?
The
Education Act 1989 (as amended) requires the Minister
responsible for Tertiary Education to have in place a
tertiary education strategy (TES) and statement of tertiary
education priorities (STEP).
• The Tertiary Education
Commission (TEC) is required to give effect to the STEP
through the negotiation and approval of tertiary education
organisations (TEO) profiles.
• The current TES and
STEP expire in 2007
• A discussion document is out for
public consultation until October 27 2006
• The next
TES and STEP will be published in December 2006
The
government is also releasing:
• a report on progress
towards achieving the goals of the previous TES
• a
report on the outcomes achieved by the tertiary education
system, and
• two reports that explore the
effectiveness of the current strategy.
These are
available at:
http://www.educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz/
What is
the link to the tertiary reforms?
The tertiary reforms
are about building a funding, planning, monitoring, and
quality assurance system that supports TEOs to focus on
outcomes. The TES and the STEP set the expectations as to
what outcomes the TEOs should focus on and explain how the
outcomes are linked to the government's goals of economic
transformation, families young and old and national
identity.
The TEC will use the STEP in particular to
guide its discussions with TEOs in agreeing the new three
year funding plans. TEOs will not be funded unless they can
demonstrate that they are achieving the outcomes sought.
These plans are the new mechanism for ensuring greater
quality, relevance and value for money.
The STEP
priorities are not an exhaustive list of what the government
will fund. The government will continue to fund, within the
overall fiscal constraint, quality, relevant education and
research. We want to maintain a broad, inclusive tertiary
education system that contributes to the economic, cultural
and social development of the country.
Why have just
four priorities been identified?
This is not an
exhaustive list. Remember that these are discussion
documents and there will be wide consultation and input
before anything is finalised. I now welcome the opportunity
for stakeholders across the sector to express their views as
this will assist the government in making decisions on which
priorities best reflect our goals.
Does the setting of new
priorities mean the government is prepared to spend more
money to achieve its aims?
This process is simply about
setting the direction for tertiary education. Funding issues
will be decided as part of the normal budgetary
process.
What does this mean for students? Will it
ultimately affect courses they can take?
This is an
opportunity for students to participate in the setting of
priorities for the sector. The process aims to achieve
greater quality and relevance and value for money for
taxpayers, employers, students and other stakeholders. This
is not about reducing access to tertiary education, but
ensuring the provision of courses that are of a higher
standard and are relevant to the economy's needs.
The
current TES includes a number of references to the Treaty of
Waitangi, why doesn’t the discussion document?
The TES
and STEP are framed around the government’s goals of
economic transformation, families young and old and national
identity. The TES and STEP are about setting clear
expectations of how the tertiary system will contribute to
these goals. The Treaty of Waitangi is an integral part of
how the tertiary education system works. It can be seen in
the on-going support for kaupapa Maori education at wananga
and other tertiary education organisations and in the
specific relationships between iwi and TEOs.
Why aren’t
there specific targets?
We want to sharpen the focus and
be clearer about the shifts that we expect in the tertiary
education system. Targets can provide a mechanism to
achieve this. To be effective however, targets need to be
carefully designed. We have not suggested specific targets
in the discussion document; rather we indicate areas where
we want to see improvement (e.g. increasing the number of
New Zealander’s achieving at level 4 and above before the
age of 25).
Don’t the TES and STEP add to the
compliance requirements on the sector alongside charters and
profiles?
The government is mindful of compliance costs
and seeks to reduce these wherever possible. Under the
process guiding the new tertiary framework consideration
will be given to whether legislative requirements need to be
updated.
Ends