Welfare Dependency: A Principal Driver Of Crime?
Welfare Dependency: A Principal Driver Of
Crime?
Speech By David
Garrett MP, ACT New Zealand
To ACT
National Conference; Wellington College, Dufferin St,
Wellington
Friday, February 5 2010
First, I would like to thank you all for coming today. I know you will all be expecting me to discuss Three Strikes and to give an update on the revised policy, but today I want to step back a bit, and look at the bigger picture. So for those who want an update, please make sure you pick up one of the pamphlets we have prepared. If you still have questions, or wish to discuss aspects of the policy further, please feel free to contact me directly.
We have had various sessions today on the perils of the Emissions Trading Scheme, on ridding ourselves of useless red tape, and why parents should be in charge of their kids’ education. These different topics are all linked by a common philosophy - that we can choose for ourselves how best to live our lives.
ACT believes that the best
decisions are made at the dinner table, not the Cabinet
table.
We in this room want a more prosperous New Zealand
for present and future generations in New Zealand. Unlike
every other Party in Parliament, we recognise that far from
the Government assisting citizens to achieve this goal, it
is the Government that’s holding us back. Government
cannot grow the economy, but it can certainly stuff it up
for those who can.
The state does however, have one
very important role - to keep people safe from criminals.
This should be the number one priority for any Government.
The vast majority of New Zealanders are law-abiding
people, who want to build a better future. Government
should get out of the way and let them – and come down
hard on those who break the law.
The 2008 election rid
us of a government of apologists. In 2002 Labour changed
the law so that rapists and violent thugs could be released
on parole after just one third of their sentence. Labour
thought that if we were nice to them, they might just be
nice back.
I am an ACT member because, unlike Labour,
we are not a party of idiots. ACT is the natural home for
those who believe in common sense law and order policies.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that
tough action is the only language violent criminals
understand. Over 92 percent of the population demonstrated
that they knew this in 1999, when they voted for tougher
sentences in a referendum. The other eight percent,
however, took charge for the following nine years.
Recent
statements indicate they have learnt nothing while in
Opposition. On Tuesday, former Labour MP David Parker spoke
in Parliament about ‘the day when Graeme Burton re-enters
society’. Well even Graeme Burton, someone who has killed
two men and tried to murder several others, knows he will
never be let back into society. That is, it seems, unless
David Parker and his mates are let back into power.
It was also under Labour that Burton received his $12,000 state of the art titanium leg, courtesy of the taxpayer. Governments are supposed to keep us safe, not reward murderers. I am pleased to be in a room full of good people who realise this.
Back in 1997, the UK Labour Party had the slogan
‘tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime’. There
is one particular cause of crime I want to address right
now, and that’s welfare support for those who are of
undeserving of it. They are relatively few, but they have
an impact far beyond their numbers.
Many people say
poverty and crime are linked. This is both completely
contrary to the evidence, and an insult to the temporarily
unemployed and working poor, who make an honest living and
are trying hard to climb the ladder. It is worth reminding
ourselves that is the poor and brown who are overwhelmingly
the victims of crime, not middle aged white guys like
me.
There are a good number of people who have it ingrained in them that this country owes them a living. It is after all, a country that, through welfare, has provided their parents with a living and is now doing the same for their own children. Last Monday I ran into Principal Youth Court judge Andrew Becroft in Christchurch. The previous evening he had given a speech in which he spoke of a ‘lost generation’ of children, the product of a broken system.
It’s a system that has given birth to killers like Bailey Junior Kurariki, done for manslaughter at the age of 12. Despite extensive efforts to rehabilitate him, he has reoffended again and again on parole. Kurariki and his ilk grew up with two terrible role models; their parents – when they are there - and the welfare system that makes this way of life so attractive to these miscreants.
I have heard beneficiaries refer to dole day as ‘pay day’. As of September last year 612 people have been getting the dole for between five and ten years. Another 195 have been getting it for 10 to 20 years; nine others for over 20 years. I confess that one in the last category is known to me personally.
Judge Becroft has said that the number of violent offenders the Youth Court deals with has doubled between 1995 and 2007. By definition then, the system that has produced that result must be broken. Governments are responsible for the welfare system that’s gifted us a lost generation, high in crime and bereft of values. I’m glad this government is making a positive impact where it must – in law and order. But only with ACT’s input can this government create a policy mix which rewards good values, protects the weak, and closes the welfare trap in which too many refuse to climb out of.
‘Tough on crime, tough on
the causes of crime’ has been a mere slogan for far too
long. It’s time to face up to the fact that ‘the causes
of the crime’ are not just the obvious ones identified at
the National Party’s Drivers of Crime conference last
year. It’s time to face up to the fact that in its
present form, the welfare state has - in considerable part -
facilitated the development of a ‘crime is OK’ culture
among some. Three strikes is a major shift in our criminal
law.
It would not have happened without us.
Reforming the welfare state is a much greater challenge, but in my view one that needs to happen if we really are to tackle the causes of crime. It will certainly never happen without ACT leading the charge.
ENDS