Q+A: Louisa Wall and Colin Craig on Gay Marriage
Sunday June 10, 2012
Shane Taurima
Interviews Louisa Wall and Colin Craig about Gay
Marriage
Q + A – June 10,
2012
SHANE TAURIMA interview
LOUISA WALL
and COLIN CRAIG about gay
marriage
SHANE
Thank you both for joining us this morning. Colin Craig,
more than two-thirds of Kiwis support it. Why don’t
you?
COLIN CRAIG – Conservative Party
leader
Well, look, a poll says that, and if we look at the States,
most of the polling over there says, you know, 60% to 70%.
But 32 out of 32 states when it when to a
referenda—
SHANE
Let’s talk about New Zealand.
MR
CRAIG ...decided it
was—
SHANE
The New Zealand poll, though – nearly two-thirds support
it. Why don’t you?
MR
CRAIG Why don’t I is I
think that marriage is not purely something that belongs to
the state, and I think what we’re talking about here is an
intersection of many different interests. So, marriage is
cultural, it’s traditional, it’s an institution in our
society—
SHANE
So tell us why you don’t support it.
MR
CRAIG Why I don’t
support a change to that is that I think that marriage is a
word that’s historically, traditionally defined, and I
think that all New Zealanders have an interest in it. Now,
if all New Zealanders did decide, and I would support a
referenda on this, if all New Zealanders decided, “Hey,
yeah, look, we’re ready for a change,” fair enough, but
I don’t think that’s where New Zealanders are
at.
SHANE
So you’d back a referendum?
MR
CRAIG Absolutely, I
would,
yeah.
SHANE
Louisa Wall, why do you want it?
LOUISA WALL –
Labour
MP
Because our community want it. So, the rainbow community
have been asking for this for a long time, so as chair of
Rainbow Labour and our caucus, it’s been my prerogative,
as the chair of that group, to put a private members bill
forward in response to our community. So we know 400 of our
community have civil unions every year, but about 80 of
those people – so 20%, roughly – are heterosexual
couples. So in the civil union space, we have equality, and
in the marriage space, we’re wanting
equality.
SHANE
Do you have all your caucus’ support?
MS
WALL I do. I got it
through caucus, so it’s been submitted, it’s in the
ballot. It is a conscience
vote.
SHANE
So why not make it a party vote? If it’s that important,
why not put it up as part of Labour Party
policy?
MS
WALL It was in our
policy. It was in our manifesto. We went to the election
espousing the issue of human rights and equality, in terms
of marriage equality and adoption equality, so I’m merely
following through on our Labour Party policy. But it is a
conscience vote, just as alcohol is in our
caucus.
SHANE
Colin Craig, do you support one law for all?
MR
CRAIG I support equal
rights and privileges for all New
Zealanders.
SHANE
One law for all, though?
MR
CRAIG Yeah, I don’t
like that phrase, but equal rights and privileges for New
Zealanders.
SHANE
So why do you support one law for heterosexuals and one law
for homosexuals?
MR
CRAIG Well, look, I
agree with civil unions. Obviously, I’m on record for
that. Following civil unions, we changed 160 pieces of
legislation over that in this country to make sure that we
had equality. What we’re talking about here is who has the
right to use and define the word “marriage”, and I
believe there's a status quo. We’ve got generation after
generation, marriage has been between and a woman, and that
is what I believe the New Zealanders want. They’ve got
cultural investment in this, historical investment in this,
religious investment in
this.
SHANE
But why one law for homosexuals and one law for
heterosexuals?
MR
CRAIG The only
difference here is the word “marriage”. I mean, we’re
not talking about an issue of equality across other things.
We’ve addressed that in this country, and rightly
so.
SHANE
So if it’s only to do with a word, why are you against
it?
MR CRAIG
Because this word is an important word. The people are
invested in it, and we can see that. This is a debate that
rages not just here but around the world, particularly the
Western world. That’s where it’s being debated. So the
word’s important, and it has great meaning and
significance to many New Zealanders, and I think the issue
here is not about rights, it’s about respect. It’s
respecting what that word already
means.
SHANE
Well, do you respect – as an example, do you respect the
same-sex community who want this option?
MR
CRAIG Well, look, it’s
all very well for a small section of the community, and
let’s
remember—
SHANE
Do you have respect for them, though, Colin
Craig?
MR CRAIG
Let’s remember— I do, and let’s remember that this is
not where all homosexuals are at. There are a number of
homosexuals who take a different view. They talk to me, and
they’re saying, “No, look, we are happy with where
we’ve got to in this country. We do not want to challenge
what marriage means—“
MS
WALL Shane, can I
just—?
MR
CRAIG “We respect it
already has a meaning for others.”
MS
WALL Can I just
contribute there? I mean, the reality is that marriage in
New Zealand is a civil institution The religious institution
or the religious right that our churches have won’t be
changed by defining marriage as I proposed.
SHANE
What will change?
MS
WALL Is the
definition of marriage, which is about two people,
regardless of sex, sexual orientation or gender identity,
having the choice. And so Colin’s point that some sectors
of the rainbow community are happy with civil unions, and
actually I was. My partner and I had a civil union. But
there are others, and I guess the most prominent person at
the moment is Alison Mau. She wants to
marry.
SHANE
Why are you so hung up on marriage, on the term
“marriage”, on the word?
MS
WALL Marriage is a
social institution. It conveys
resiliency—
SHANE
Is it a religious thing?
MS
WALL That’s part
of it. It’s a civil and social institution in our
society.
SHANE
But you can have, as an example, a civil union ceremony at a
church.
MS
WALL Heterosexual
and homosexual couples can have that. Marriage is a right of
everybody. I believe it’s a human right, and my challenge
to Colin is that in his philosophy or with his party
principles, he espouses to believe in equality, he espouses
to believe in individual freedom. And actually that’s what
this is about – an individual’s right and freedom to
marry.
SHANE
What about gay adoption, Colin Craig? Do you support
that?
MR CRAIG
Well, look, it’s a different debate. We have a lot of
rules and restrictions
about—
SHANE
But do you support it?
MR
CRAIG ...adoption in New
Zealand, and I support the existing law, which has a lot of
restrictions.
SHANE
So you don’t support it?
MR
CRAIG No, I support the
existing law, and the current law does rule out gay
adoption.
SHANE
Why? Tell us why? Why shouldn’t a same-sex couple be able
to adopt?
MR
CRAIG Well, I’ll tell
you why we have the existing law at the
moment—
SHANE
No, tell us why you don’t want the change.
MR
CRAIG OK, I support the
existing law. The existing law says what matters here, above
all other things and solely is the rights of a child. Now, I
actually think – and it’s my opinion – I actually
think there are difference between a man and a woman. I
actually think that when we get to choose the environment in
which a child grows up, to have both a male and female role
model, a mum and a dad is the ideal, and therefore I do
support that
restriction.
SHANE
We don’t have that now, do we, though, Louisa
Wall?
MS
WALL No, it may be
the ideal, but I think more ideal for our children is that
they grow up in a loving environment. And what our rainbow
community are asking for is the same rights to legalise and
formalise their relationship, and we all know that as a
basic unit in society, two people who bond themselves for
life provide a stable environment for children to grow up
in. So as a consequence of my bill, under section 3 of the
Adoption Act, because same-sex couples will be defined as
spouses, they will be able to jointly adopt. And I think in
society, that’s what we want. We have a number of children
growing up in single-family households, and actually
anything that adds value in terms of those social
institutions for our
children—
SHANE
Do different gender role models matter, though?
MS
WALL But we’re
assuming that same-sex couples actually don’t have
whanaunga or the wider social groups to ensure that our
children do have role models of both sexes. I mean, at the
end of the day, if this is about children, we want children
to grow up in loving
families.
SHANE
Isn’t that the point, though, Colin Craig? Isn’t it
about children being able to be brought up and cared for in
a loving, tender, nurtured environment?
MR
CRAIG Love is important.
It’s not everything. Role modelling is very important –
the single biggest influence on children is parents. I
actually think a mum and a dad – when we get to choose,
and with adoption we do, and there aren’t many of them,
and there's a huge number of great parents out there waiting
to adopt already. It’s not like we’re short of takers
here. I don’t believe there's any impetus or any need to
change the existing law. We’re doing the right thing by
children. We don’t have a lot of adoptions that are
outside of family – what we call stranger adoptions –
but those we do are working well. I think in 25 years,
there's been one that failed. We’re doing it right.
There's no need to change
here.
SHANE
Very quickly, because I have to wrap it up, but how
confident are you that it’s going to get through – gay
marriage, gay adoption?
MS
WALL It will get
through the first reading, I’m absolutely confident. I
think that there is public opinion that says that they
support same-sex
marriage.
SHANE
And there we will have to leave it. Thank you both for
joining
us.
ENDS