NZ Mass Arrivals Bill Major Setback For Human Rights
Amnesty International Public Statement Amnesty International:
NZ Mass Arrivals Bill Major Setback For Human Rights
for
immediate release
29 August 2012
Amnesty International is appalled with the
New Zealand Government’s decision to push forward with a
Bill to introduce detention under a mass warrant for asylum
seekers, who arrive in groups of more than
10.
“Yesterday the Transport and
Industrial Select Committee released a report supporting a
Bill that will breach several important human rights,
including the right to be free of arbitrary detention, and
access to justice rights,” said Grant Bayldon, Executive
Director of Amnesty
International.
“The Government has
shown a total disregard of the violent and terrifying
situations from which these people are
fleeing.”
“People have a
fundamental legal right to seek asylum, and Amnesty
International is deeply concerned that the Government is
giving itself the ability to breach these obligations.”
While the Organisation supports the
efforts by states to curb people smuggling, research has
shown that harsh, punitive policies imposed on those using
smugglers to flee persecution does nothing to deter the
people smugglers
themselves.
“Having an efficient
processing system that recognises the need for security,
health and identity checks, of those that arrive is also
commendable, but what needs to be understood is that we
already have a robust system for doing this. Unnecessarily
locking up women, children and families will violate New
Zealand’s international obligations”.
“Detention can fundamentally
damage individuals who have already fled tortures we can’t
even imagine and thus it is crucially important that
detention is used only as a last resort and not on mass in
an effort to deter people
smugglers.
Experience in countries
like Australia has shown that the the cost to repair the
psychological damages caused by detention can last for years
after people are released. This will not only further
unnecessarily burden New Zealand taxpayers but robs
individuals of the ability to contribute productively to
their new country."
“Any solutions
that view asylum seekers as ‘illegal migrants’ and locks
them up rather than protecting them is illegal under Article
31 of the Refugee Convention,” said Grant Bayldon.
Amnesty International is also
extremely disappointed with the language being used as
politicians promote it with terms such as ‘illegals’;
‘illegal immigrants’ and ‘queue jumpers’.
“They are words used in the
political discourse in Australia, but are now finding their
way into New Zealand law and in the media. They are
derogatory, misleading and dehumanising, and encourage
xenophobic attitudes amongst the
public.”
Amnesty International
believes that the Bill is unnecessary, that it will not
achieve its stated purposes and it risks breaching human
rights obligations. It will jeopardise New Zealand’s
reputation as a world leader in protecting the rights of
refugees and asylum seekers.
“We
are urging all parties to vote against the Bill in its
second reading and call for any debate to have the rights of
asylum seekers at its centre,” added Grant
Bayldon.
To read Amnesty
International’s full submission on the Immigration (Mass
Arrivals) Amendment Bill go to: http://www.amnesty.org.nz/files/120608%20Submission%20Immigration%20Amendment%20Bill.pdf
Love
human rights? Donate now at http://bit.ly/aianz-donate
ENDS