Devoy may step in if Peters continues to stigmatise
Sunday 16 June, 2013
Race Relations
Commissioner Dame Susan Devoy says she may step in if
Winston Peters continues to ‘stigmatise one population to
his own benefit’
New Race Relations
Commissioner Dame Susan Devoy says she expects New Zealand
First Leader Winston Peters will play the race card in the
lead up to the next election.
“I think what
Winston will do, and I think it’s been talked about by
other experts and academics in the field in relation to his
speech on Sin City, is to use the race card,” she said on
TVNZ’s Q+A programme this morning.
Asked if
she’d get involved if Mr Peters continued in that vein,
Dame Susan said “Well, I will. I’ll have to, and
particularly if people come to the Commission, not that that
will
border on making a complaint, but there’s a
broader human rights issue here in that he will continue to
stigmatise one population to his own
benefit.”
“Winston has carried on this tirade
for a long time, and I don’t think anything that I’m
going to say is going to actually make a leopard change his
spots, to be perfectly honest,” she said.
Dame
Susan also said in her opinion the Al Nisbett cartoon
published was racist. “People say it’s just a joke,
it’s funny and whatever. And I say, ‘Yes, but if
you’ve never been the
butt of that joke, if you’ve
never been the population that is stereotyped and
stigmatised all your life, how can you begin to understand
how offensive that is?’”
Even though the
cartoon did not meet the legal threshold, Dame Susan said
“the law is not the be all and end all of everything”.
“We have to look at our own behaviours and
attitudes. And therefore, you know, I’d like to think that
those in the media would be encouraged to do that as well. I
mean, you know, sometimes we have to look and say, ‘This
is not right.’”
Q+A, 9-10am Sundays on
TV ONE and one hour later on TV ONE plus 1.
Repeated Sunday evening at 11:30pm. Streamed live at
www.tvnz.co.nz
Thanks to the support from NZ On
Air.
Q+A is on Facebook, http://www.facebook.com/NZQandA#!/NZQandA
and on Twitter, http://twitter.com/#!/NZQandA
Q+A
CORIN
DANN INTERVIEWS DAME SUSAN
DEVOY
SUSAN
WOOD
Dame Susan Devoy’s appointment as Race
Relations Commissioner two months ago coincided with a
number of high-profile race issues. Winston Peters played
the race card, blaming Chinese migrants for most of
Auckland’s problems. She was silent on that, but the
infamous Al Nisbett beneficiary-bashing cartoons drew Dame
Susan into the spotlight. Corin asked her if she’d changed
her view of what racism is since she took on the
role.
DAME SUSAN DEVOY - Race Relations
Commissioner
Well, I don’t think it’s been
changed, but, you know, to be honest, I wasn’t working
specifically in that area a few months ago, and I think
that, you know, issues like the cartoon recently and other
issues that will continue to arise in the media or in the
public arena have reinforced that we have some issues in
NZ.
CORIN
DANN
So do you have a good grasp on what racism
is?
SUSAN
I’m getting a good grasp. I mean, I have my own
personal views, and I’m starting to formulate my ideas.
What I’d really like to be able to do is to get more out
into the mainstream public and get people really thinking
and challenging their own ideas and views about what racism
is.
CORIN So, just
coming back to that, can you give us an example now of what
you think racism is? I mean, for example, I suppose, was
Winston Peters’ speech? I know you didn’t want to
comment on it at the time to give it more airtime than you
thought was warranted, but was that a racist
speech?
SUSAN
Well, I think what Winston will do, and I think
it’s been talked about by other experts and academics in
the field in relation to his speech on Sin City is to use
the race card. We know that there’s an election coming up.
I think sometimes I have to exercise judgement as to what is
important, what’s worth getting involved in, and for him,
I wasn’t going to give him any oxygen, but I’m sure the
occasion will arise leading up to the next election. But
what I say to people is, you know, the issues that arise, I
say, particularly as a white woman, people say to me, ‘How
do you know? You’ve never experienced racial
discrimination.’ And I say, ‘Yes, but that makes me
quite in a good position to say to people…’ And a lot of
people say to me, you know, ‘How would you know?’ And I
said, ‘Well, I don’t know, but I have a real
understanding now that if you’ve never experienced in your
life, how do you know how profoundly offensive it is?’ And
if I can go back to that, you know, that incident of the
cartoon. People say it’s just a joke, it’s funny and
whatever. And I say, ‘Yes, but if you’ve never been the
butt of that joke, if you’ve never been the population
that is stereotyped and stigmatised all your life, how can
you begin to understand how offensive that
is?’
CORIN
So, yeah, on that cartoon, have you made any
approaches to try and get the threshold changed? Because you
said you weren’t able to classify that as racist because
of the rules.
SUSAN
Well, legally it’s not, but, look, it is what it
is, and I don’t make the law, and I’m not able
to-
CORIN
So, hang on. Sorry, Dame Susan. You’re saying
that cartoon was
racist?
SUSAN
Well, in my opinion, yes, it was. But it doesn’t
meet the threshold and the limits of freedom of speech, and
what we’re saying here is that the law is not the be all
and end all of everything. You know, we can’t hide behind
it, and we can’t always use it to its best effect. But
what we can do is actually exercise some civil
responsibility. So sometimes we have to make personal
choices. We have to look at our own behaviours and
attitudes. And therefore, you know, I’d like to think that
those in the media would be encouraged to do that as well. I
mean, you know, sometimes we have to look and say, ‘This
is not
right.’
CORIN
Just back to Winston Peters, because, as you point
out, you do have a great opportunity to get through to
middle NZ. Perhaps that middle NZ that might not have been
subject to so much racism as other New Zealanders. Given
that, wasn’t something like the Winston Peter’s speech a
really good opportunity to get to them, because he was
trying to get to them as well, wasn’t
he?
SUSAN
Well, yes, I think so, but if you look at it in the
context of that speech, it was a real political stoush. I
mean, he was trying to argue about what the Prime Minister
had said earlier around the relations that we have with
Chinese. I think the important thing is that, you know,
Winston has carried on this tirade for a long time, and I
don’t think anything that I’m going to say is going to
actually make a leopard change his spots, to be perfectly
honest. But what I would say is if the argument does
continue, and I think, you know, there’s been little
response from some of those groups themselves, the Asians,
because I think they’re just sick and tired of hearing
Winston talk about
that.
CORIN
But are you saying if he keeps that up, and
particularly in the white-hot environment of an election
campaign, you will stand up and get
involved?
SUSAN
Well, I will. I’ll have to, and particularly if
people come to the commission, not that that will border on
making a complaint, but there’s a broader human rights
issue here in that he will continue to stigmatise one
population to his own
benefit.
CORIN
Looking back through some of the notes in your
biography, and there’s a little bit of discussion going on
now about Nelson Mandela. Obviously a lot of fears for his
life at the moment, so there will be discussions about
Apartheid and that whole sporting boycott. And you were very
honest in your biography, very honest in saying that you
would have gone to South Africa to play squash, but you were
just worried about being blacklisted. Do you still share
that view? You didn’t think that the boycott of sport
necessarily
worked?
SUSAN
Well, I think you have different views and opinions
when you’re 20. I mean, I was very focused on just being a
sportsperson and just playing squash, and, you know, that
whole political thing was quite different to me. But I think
that the fact that I never went to South Africa then and I
never went at any time in my career would suggest that I
don’t condone Apartheid then, and I certainly don’t
now.
CORIN
Yeah, no, it was interesting, and you talked about,
sort of, sitting down and doing pros and cons at the time.
So, I mean, it must have been- you must have thought about
it a fair bit.
SUSAN
I did, and I had repeated invitations to go over 10
or 12 years, so, you know, it was always very interesting.
But I recall I was 17 on the Springbok tour, and I didn’t
even then, I suppose, realise the significance and the
importance of all of that, and it’s not until you get a
little bit older and a little bit wiser that you look at
things differently. And I think, you know, it’s a very sad
time at the moment with, you know, Nelson Mandela, and I
just hope and pray- He is probably, in my opinion, the
world’s greatest humanitarian, and I hope his legacy lives
on.
CORIN
How do you feel about the whole concept of
institutional racism in NZ? The idea that because Maori,
Pacific Islanders are so badly represented in all those
terrible statistics around prisons and poverty and crime
that there is an institutional racism in NZ. Do you think
that that’s
true?
SUSAN I
do. I think the commission have done some really good work,
and they’ve come out with a publication called A Fair Go
For All, which is relatively recent, and it’s now under
the new term, which is what they call structural
discrimination, you know, which is, in essence, the same
thing. And it looks and has really good evidence about
particularly, I think, Maori and Pacific Island people and,
you know, why they’re overrepresented in some of these
negative
statistics.
CORIN
So how are you-? Because you’ve got this unique
position to reach out to perhaps those New Zealanders who
aren’t represented in those statistics so much, convince
them that they’ve got to perhaps do more, or they need to
do more to help those
people.
SUSAN
Well, it’s really about education and information
and an understanding of why that happens, because we’re
quick to generalise, and we’re very quick to stereotype
and not have an understanding. But, you know, I’m not
going to say that that’s also a very simple solution. I
mean, these problems have been identified for a long time,
and everyone’s quick to identify them. But there are a lot
of agencies and a lot of people doing some really, really
good work. I think we just need to work even
harder.
CORIN
And the Treaty? Where does the Treaty sit, in your
mind? Is it a document that represents a partnership between
Maori and everybody else that’s in NZ? Is that your view
of it?
SUSAN
Well, I think, you know, the Treaty is for all New
Zealanders, and I think the Treaty’s a labyrinth and
extraordinarily complicated because it has so many different
parts to it. And, again, I think that’s about education
and information. And, you know, I think the best way to
describe the Treaty is what Bishop Manu Bennett said - that
it’s a promise of two people to take care of each other.
And, you know, again, I think we need to say we’ve come a
long way in what the Treaty means to all New Zealanders as
our founding document, but we’ve still got a really long
way to go to honour that partnership
arrangement.
CORIN
Just finally, Dame Susan, I remember hearing an
interview when you first were appointed that you didn’t
think it would be too complicated, this job, in some ways.
Do you still share that, given the tricky nature of the
cartoons and those sorts of issues? That it is not
necessarily a complicated
job?
SUSAN
Well, firstly, Corin, I thought you might ask me
that, so I checked it, and I didn’t actually say that, so,
um, but it’s not that it’s not overcomplicated. You
know, I have a mandate. I have a mandate in what I have to
do. Difficult to achieve it, I will admit that, but, you
know, at the end of the day, I’m going to give it my best
shot. And it’s early days, and I think people- and hope
that they judge me on my performance, and only time will
tell that.
CORIN
Dame Susan, thank you very much for your time. We
appreciate you coming on
Q+A.
SUSAN
Thank
you.
ENDS