Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
The crisis in New Zealand’s civil justice system
The crisis in New Zealand’s civil justice system.
Barrister Frances Joychild has recently published an article on the Auckland District Law Society website and in other legal publications about the poor level of access to, and the declining state of the New Zealand’s civil law arrangements. It follows on from other recent articles by Dame Anne Salmond and Justice Helen Winkelman who each make similar points. When three such distinguished people are moved to address related issues in subsequent months there are serious questions to be asked.
Frances’ evidence demonstrates that the situation for civil litigants and their representatives is becoming desperate. It’s an important article and deserves to be read well beyond an audience of barristers and lawyers.
By referring to the speech late last year by Justice Helen Winkelman who delivered the annual Ethel Benjamin address in Dunedin, Frances makes the link between the high number of unrepresented clients and the public’s limited access to adequate representation in civil cases. Justice Winkelman said
there are growing “ indications that far from being viewed as a democratic institution, civil courts are, for policy purposes at least, regarded as a luxury service for which users should pay”.
She wrote that 30 to 40% of Auckland District Court cases include at least one unrepresented litigant. So do more than a half of Supreme Court cases from 2014. As well as these cases, which can block courts and waste time, Frances estimates that at least half and possibly closer to 2/3 of us are unable to access civil legal services. This is largely because of insufficient funds to money to pay legal and court fees. Amongst the ugly impacts of the broken system is the news that, without access to the law, some small businesses in South Auckland are resorting to using gangs rather than the Court to enforce the repayment of debts.
As well as the high costs there have been cuts in access to legal aid, which is now available only to the very poorest. Legal Aid also comes with stringent repayment conditions and punitive interest rates which will deter many from even pursuing a case. In addition large numbers of lawyers have withdrawn completely from the legal aid system whose rules Frances describes as Byzantine and demeaning to legal representatives. Even community law centre lawyers, the last resort for many, are no longer permitted to represent poor clients.
Access to the law should be for everyone. Having no access to justice or opting to enforce it by thuggery is no kind of justice at all. From the evidence of her article the seeping impacts of under-funding and restrictive rules are starting to poison our society. Anyone of us could need legal help because of poor behaviour by employers, contractors or franchisors, ill-health or injury, family circumstance, or because of the overwhelming power and wide discretion of the state towards people in the benefits system. To hear of the desperation of clients and the difficulties of earning a living representing people who are neither rich nor influential is deeply disturbing.
When she says that by year’s end she was turning away many more contactees than she could help and for one caller said she was 20th lawyer he had tried we should be deeply concerned. Notwithstanding the proposals Frances makes to her colleagues about measures to mitigate the situation there is nonetheless evidence of serious and systemic problems with our civil legal system.
When these difficulties are seen as part of the wider attacks on our democratic infrastructure that were described by Dame Anne in her January 14 article about the erosion of democratic rights in New Zealand we start to see that the civil legal system is yet another element of New Zealand’s civic infrastructure that is being eroded and undermined.
References
Frances Joychild QC Continuing the conversation – the fading star of the rule of law.
Dame Professor Anne Salmond Continuing the conversation … the fading star of the rule of law http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/comment/64894646/Erosion-of-democratic-rights 13 Jan 2015
Her Honour, Justice Helen Winkelmann, Chief High Court Judge
Access to Justice - Who Needs Lawyers? 7 November 2014
Public Good Aotearoa New Zealand
Rebuilding the social contract between people and government
A Strong Public Sector: Firstly we will be working to support a stronger public sector. A well resourced, fully capable and future focussed public service can provide public value in the form of good quality services, infrastructure and a fair framework of protective regulation for people and the environment.
Genuine Democracy and Engagement: a fuller experience of democracy means we all have a bigger say in influencing the NZ we want to live in. Real democracy involves more than a couple of opportunities to vote every three years. Genuine democracy gives place for dissent.
Common Wealth: Community wealth is about more than money in the bank. Its about community assets and community capabilities.
Gordon Campbell: On Why We Can’t Survive Two More Years Of This
Lillian Hanly, RNZ: The Year In Politics - Stories That Dominated The Headlines In 2024
Waikato Regional Council: Studies Open Door To Mercury Islands Underwater World
Office of the Privacy Commissioner: Christmas Is About Giving, But Don’t Give Up Your Privacy
The Rail Advocacy Collective: Chris Trotter - Running Us Off The Rails
Natural Hazards Commission: More Landslide Claims Than Ever; NHC Encourages Homeowners To Get Prepared
Te Ara Ahunga Ora Retirement Commission: What Does Retirement Really Look Like In 2024? New Research Highlights The Financial Struggles Of Over 65s
