Free Press: ACT’s regular bulletin
Free Press
ACT’s regular
bulletin
Taxes
Up
National’s colonisation of Labour territory
is complete. We thought Helen Clark knew how to straddle
the centre of politics but John Key has taken the art to a
whole new leech-like level. The confirmation came last week
after National boasted they had made the tax system more
progressive.
You Heard That Right
With
Bill English safely overseas, poor old Steven Joyce was left
to announce that the top 10 per cent of households now pay
37.2 per cent of taxes, compared with 35.5 per cent when the
socialist Labour/Green/NZ First parties were last in
power.
Why Bother?
Meanwhile 42 per
cent of households pay less than they receive back in cash
transfers, and the lowest 30 per cent of income earners
receive $10.6 billion in income support in return for $1.7
billion paid in taxes. What is even the point of electing a
National Government? It is not obvious that a moderate
Labour Government would be worse.
From the
Horse’s Mouth
Most of this week’s Free
Press is straight out of a National press
release. They are boasting that they’ve increased
wealth redistribution. The Government Budget is 80 billion
reasons to vote for ACT.
Housing is the Underlying
Driver
Also last week the Ministry of Social
Development released its update of household income
inequality from 1982-2015. It measures income inequality
before housing costs and after housing costs. The verdict?
Inequality is a housing story, it has not changed for over
two decades, unless you count housing
costs.
Specifically
Dr Bryce Wilkinson
of the New Zealand Initiative says there has been no
significant change in income inequality over the last 10,
15, 20 or even 25 years depending on the measure used,
before housing costs. However the bottom 20 per cent of
households (by income) spent 29 per cent of their income on
housing in the 1980s compared with 54 per cent
now.
Conclusions
The National Party is
taxing top earners hard, then shovelling the money at low
income earners who pay more for housing. Free Press
suspects that it is mostly top earners who benefit from
rising house prices, so completing the money-go-round. This
is nuts.
What ACT Would Do
It is time
to give taxpayers relief. As ACT has said before, the best
way to do this is to index tax brackets to inflation (this
would have saved the average household $2,500 in tax since
2010 by ending bracket creep). Ideally we should cut the
top rates, clearly the ‘rich’ (read hard working PAYE
earners) are paying their share. At the same time, there
needs to be serious land use and infrastructure funding
reform to get the housing market functioning again, but
Free Press readers have heard it all
before.
There is a Santa
Grant
Robertson told parliament there is no Santa and the free
market doesn’t work. Here is David Seymour at his best,
reassuring the nation’s children that Robertson is wrong
on both counts.