Jakarta's Plan for Dialogue with Papua
Jakarta's Plan for Dialogue with Papua Must Synchronise with
local
Papuan Politics
Jakarta, 25 February 2011 - We
welcome the plan for a Jakarta-Papua
dialogue that is
now being pursued by the Indonesian Government.
Peaceful
dialogue is the only dignified way to resolve all the
political and humanitarian problems that have persisted
in Papua to
the present day. A dialogue between Jakarta
and Papua can also be an
indicator of the government's
seriousness in protecting and complying
with the basic
rights of the Papuan people.
However, we request that the
entire process of dialogue should take
full account of
the aspirations of the Papuan people. In taking the
dialogue process forward, we ask that the government
consistently
protects and complies with the basic rights
of the Papua people by
ensuring that that there is no
repetition of violations of
the Papuan human rights.
The government should review the presence
of the TNI
security forces and the under-cover security operations
that continue to occur.
On the other hand, we also
call for the local political situation in
Papua to be
reviewed along with the Papua-Jakarta dialogue that is to
be undertaken by the government. Building the confidence
of the
Papuan people in the seriousness of the
government is a basic
condition before a Jakarta-Papua
dialogue can be held.
Bearing in mind the local political
situation that is now developing,
we ask the government
not to proceed with the election of members of
the
Majelis Rakyat Papua which is planned for 28 February. The
MRP is an institution that was mandated by Law 21/2001
on Special
Autonomy for Papua (OTSUS). In a number of
forums, the vast majority
of the Papuan people have
declared that OTSUS has failed because it
has not taken
sides with, given protection to, empowered and
fulfilled
the basic rights of the indigenous Papuan people. This is
why the people have handed OTSUS back to the government
in Jakarta.
The government has nevertheless pressed ahead
with the election of a
second-term MRP in fifteen
districts of Papua, in accordance with
Perdasus 4/2010.
The second-term MRP is due to be sworn into office
and
will consist of 75 members, of whom 42 are from the province
of
Papua and 33 are from the province of West
Papua.
The MRP elections are regarded by many people as
having been forced
through. The DPRP has called for the
MRP elections to be postponed,
while the leaders of
three Protestant churches, the GKI, the KINGMI
and the
Papuan Baptist Church, have called for the MRP process to be
halted. and for dialogue to take place between the
Jakarta government
and representives of the Papuan
people, mediated by a neutral third
party.
Moreover,
the election of MRP members has not been transparent, it
has failed to comply with the electoral stages
stipulated by the
Perdasus, while the counting of the
votes has been deeply fraudulent.
We are afraid that
forcing through the swearing in of the members of
the
MRP will only reinforce the Papuan people's sense of
disappointment towards a government that lacks any
understanding and
has shown no respect for local Papuan
feelings.
This is why it is important to ensure that all
initiatives taken by
Jakarta involve the participation
of the Papuan people and take
account of their
aspirations.
The creation of a special body to handle all
the problems in Papua is
extremely important and should
take place in parallel with the
holding of dialogue.
This is extremely important in order to ensure
that the
government's initiative is seen in a positive light and
free from suspicion and to ensure that the dialogue
process for
which the Papuan people have hoped can be
speedily realised. We also
urge the government to
undertake a more comprehensive evaluation of
the
implementation of development that has taken place in Papua
up to
the present.
(The Alliance for Papua in Jakarta
was set up as an expression of
solidarity with
humanitarianism, in support of fellow human beings in
their struggle for justice and
truth.)
ENDS