Wards Decision Welcomed
MEDIA RELEASE
12 April 2007 - For immediate release
Wards Decision Welcomed
Napier city
councillor Dr Robin Gwynn said today he was delighted to
welcome the decision of the Local Government Commission that
Napier should have a partial ward system.
The wards,
he said, should ensure that all areas of the city feel they
have a voice on Council.
‘Wards offer the
potential of fairer representation, a better spread of
councillors, and more personal involvement by
citizens.
‘It is fundamentally important that the
Commission has so clearly rejected Council’s claim that
Napier is just one big community of interest. The 2002 Local
Government Act says that “when making a decision, a local
authority should take account of the diversity of the
community”. The Commission’s decision should encourage
that process, and help Napier better come to terms with its
extensive areas of deprivation and very distinct
suburbs.
‘Some parts of the city, like Bay View,
Onekawa, Pirimai, Tamatea and Te Awa have never had a
resident councillor since Napier’s previous ward system
was abandoned, while Napier Hill has been increasingly
over-represented.
‘Council has always been good at
managing. Arguably, it has been less good at representing.
The partial ward system should help with that. Hopefully it
will also reverse the trend that has seen voter
participation slump by 10% across the past three
elections.
‘I would like to think that the
Commission’s decision will lead in the next term to
strengthened suburban associations, more councillors holding
clinics, and greater democratic participation as people
realise they can help mould their own
society.
‘Consultation’ means a legal process, and
the Napier City Council is excellent at that. It also means
on-going contact and face-to-face discussion at a local
level, and the partial ward system will help that happen.
‘But first, we have to make the system work. This
year’s election, and the rethinking that will have to take
place as wards are bedded in, should be an exciting
experience.
On a personal level, Cr Gwynn said the
need to draw attention to the unsatisfactory representation
arrangements in Napier had been a major reason why he had
become involved in local government.
‘I expect to
stand again as a councillor in the forthcoming elections,
and like other councillors will have to consider my position
in the light of the new arrangements.
Ironically,
having been the sole voice in Council urging the need for
wards, I may well have to stand ‘at large’, since my
argument has been that the area of Napier where I live, on
the Hill, has been over
represented.’
ENDS