Why I Opposed Council Funding for the AUT Campus
Why I Opposed Council Funding for the AUT Campus
Michael Williams, Botany-Clevedon Councillor
Manukau City Council proposes to purchase land in Great South Road for an AUT campus. I was one of only two councillors (Quax and Williams) who opposed proceeding to consultation. My reasons for voting against were as follows:
Location
Manukau has for some time been
working on a proposal for a university precinct at Manukau
City Centre. This proposal is not in keeping with that plan
as the land is quite a distance from the proposed precinct
and therefore will not deliver the transportation and city
centre vibrancy outcomes desired.
High Debt / Reduced
Capacity to Borrow
It is proposed that the purchase /
development be funded by $60 million of debt. Council's
capacity to raise debt for major infrastructure projects
will be limited by this investment.
Cost
I don't
believe claims that "It won't cost ratepayers a cent". The 8
hectare site is too large for the proposed use and as a
result, the rent yield will be less than half the interest
cost. The loss over five years could be as high as $15
million. At a time when many predict property values will
plateau, as they did from 1996 to 2002, council is relying
on increases in property value of three times the rate of
inflation just to break even.
Financial
Analysis
Council Officers have not provided financial
projections for the project. In my view council should not
have gone to consultation without first understanding the
financial impact. This represents a significant change to
the LTCCP and the financial impacts of the decision should
be understood and disclosed.
Effect on MIT
We have seen
in recent weeks that MIT have had to lay off 7% of their
staff. I cannot see any value in Council subsidising the
entry of a potential competitor which may further erode
MIT's position.
Educational Need
The rationale for
establishing a "University" is to provide educational
pathways for young people who are currently not going on to
further education. My view is that MIT is better placed to
meet the unmet educational need than AUT.
No Silver
Bullet
This is not a "Manukau University', but a
satellite campus for a hybrid university / polytechnic (AUT)
within 2km of an existing polytechnic (MIT). Even if it was
a University, it would not be the silver bullet to remedy
poor educational outcomes in South Auckland.
I will be listening very closely to what residents and ratepayers have to say during the submission process. I encourage those in support and in opposition to this proposal to lodge written and/or verbal submissions to council. However, I have not yet heard any convincing argument that would lead me to support this proposal.
Michael Williams, Botany-Clevedon Councillor, 15 December 2007
ends