Rosebank Road Park takes a step closer
Media Release - The Tree Council
12th August 2010
Commemorative Rosebank
Road Park takes a step closer
Avondale community
groups and The Tree Council are a step closer to
seeing a public reserve created from the Lot on which two
controversial landmark trees stand in Rosebank Road,
Avondale, but time is running out.
Auckland City council’s Arts, Culture and Recreation committee yesterday recommended that the land be purchased and referred the matter to the Finance and Strategy committee, which meets next Wednesday 18th August. This followed a deputation to the committee by The Tree Council, Avondale Community Gardeners and Nina Patel, a local resident, putting forward the arguments for its purchase.
However, while the developer, Jonathan McKearney of Connell Place Ltd, has offered to sell the land to the Council, he has given them a cut off date of 13th August.
Says Sigrid Shayer, spokesperson for The Tree Council. “This wonderful pair of landmark trees deserve pride of place on the corner plot of land on which they stand. A public park would create a green gateway to the industrial and business areas, a more pleasant environment for the wider residential community, and ensure a lasting legacy to the market garden heritage of the Peninsula.”
“Instead, the developer wants to fell the Pohutukawa and build and tarmac across the whole site. This is disastrous. We will be making a further deputation to the Finance and Strategy committee next week, to urge them to back this unique and deserved opportunity.”
The proposal also has the
backing of the Avondale Community Board. Last month the
City Development Committee agreed to start the process to
protect both trees by listing (scheduling) them as notable
trees in the District Plan. That process is about to begin.
The developer meanwhile has applied to fell the Pohutukawa,
and limited notification has been made to The Tree
Council, (as per their legal agreement following their
High Court action last March) who will be supported by many
witnesses. As the developer’s application was filed
before the notification of the scheduling, his application
takes precedence.
,
ends