HNZC's statement re no change to policy on dogs is not true
Scoop team: The following is an anonymous email sent to Scoop
HNZC's statement re no change to policy on dogs is not true.
When I became a HNZC tenant my dog and cats were allowed. My tenancy manager has told me in an email that new applicants for state housing are declined if they have dogs. HNZC won't admit that publicly.
I was recently told I had to
sign the attached form agreeing to put my house dog outside
24/7 which is cruel and will undoubtedly result in a noise
complaint.
If I can't stop my dog's expressions of
distress they can take my dog and 'dispose' of said dog at
my expense. Note they also require that I agree to let
them give my details to third parties such as the SPCA and
council. My dog is registered and microchipped as per the
legal requirements and up to date on vaccinations.
To give tenants 90 days to find the money necessary to move into the private rental market or get rid of their dog is obscene. I am sick with worry being at the mercy of such callous and unreasonable ideologues. I simply cannot afford to move but nor can I kill my dog if I can't find another home for a 5yo dog with medical issues.
This is the anti-pet agenda from state landlords and is evident around the world where people in public housing are having the terms of their existence dictated to them including whether they can keep pets.
As housing becomes ever more unaffordable and we become a world of tenants our pets are in real peril, as are the livelihoods of those involved in the pet care industry from pet food manufacturers to vets etc. This anti-pet agenda is going to have huge ramifications from GDP and employment to the kids who are going to be traumatised and disaffected when Mum and Dad have to kill the four-legged family member to keep a roof over their heads.
It is
hard enough to home shelter dogs now in this depressed
economy so what hope do HNZC tenants have of re-homing their
40,000 dogs?
Signed: Very Worried Tenant.
Click for big version.
ENDS