Dunne Speaks: Time we knew our full history
Another Waitangi Day has passed – this year without adverse event – and with it, the often too brief opportunity to consider what it means to be a New Zealander, 179 years after the signing of the Treaty.
A
striking feature of this year’s typically cursory
discussion and woeful analysis was the attention paid to New
Zealanders’ understanding of their country’s history
from pre-colonial and colonial times in a manner slightly
more sophisticated than the back of the corn flakes package
descriptions prevalent when we were growing
up.
This concern was fuelled
inadvertently by the Prime Minister’s embarrassing
performance when asked about the Articles of the Treaty.
While she was clearly caught on the hop and almost certainly
answered in a way most other people would have responded in
similar circumstances, her fluffing reply highlighted a
couple of issues. First, she should have had, and read, a
briefing note on the content of the Treaty before decamping
to Waitangi to swan around for five days, and second, and
far more important, all of us individually need to become
better informed about our nation’s history and milestones.
While they may not always be the reference point, it is, for
example, highly unlikely that American school students would
reply similarly ineptly to a question about the Declaration
of Independence.
So, I am all for
young New Zealanders learning New Zealand history at school,
probably as part of a wider civics programme, where they
would also learn about our system of government, and their
rights and responsibilities as citizens, including what
citizenship means and how it has evolved over the years. The
focus needs to be on the full spread of our history – from
the earliest Polynesian migration, and the types of society
Maori and Moriori developed, and their relationships,
through to the arrival of the colonists and their
interactions – good and bad – with indigenous people,
and the development of contemporary New Zealand society, and
the full challenges it faces. It should not shy away from
the truth, but equally needs to present a balanced picture
of the New Zealand story.
An equally critical part of everyone who lives in our islands understanding where our nation has come from and how it has developed over many centuries, is understanding and valuing its languages. Te Reo Maori is obviously a vital part, and should be a core part of the primary school curriculum. Our aim should be that every young New Zealander leaves primary school with at least basic proficiency in the language, alongside their English skills, so that they can feel comfortable in a range of environments. The criticism that Maori is not an international language is really not relevant – it is a language of our country, and we should be familiar with it.
We keep saying
that the New Zealander today is unique, often without
appreciating what that means. Knowing our languages, history
and culture is an important step towards making that claim a
reality. The vast majority of us are no longer transplanted
Europeans living at the end of the world, trying to
integrate our ways and past with an indigenous people. The
uniqueness of being a contemporary New Zealander is the
opportunity our nation, its background and history, gives
each of us is to move with ease and comfort between the
Maori and Pakeha worlds, absorbing almost unconsciously
aspects of both. From that springs the modern New Zealander,
acknowledging our bicultural history, mixing that with the
strands of our individual experiences to create, thus
creating the special bond that binds the peoples of these
islands together today.
In a world
where cultural and ethnic tensions are being exacerbated,
not ameliorated, where stereotypes and prejudice are still
fuelled by politicians promoting excessive xenophobia and
intolerance of diversity for domestic partisan advantage,
New Zealand has the opportunity to be one of those nations
that stands against the pernicious
tide.
But to achieve that objective,
we first need to know and understand properly who we are,
which brings us back to the issues of history and language.
In this apparent year of delivery, giving priority to
meeting this goal would be a positive step all of us should
welcome.