TVNZ & The Gang Of 31
15 February 2006
TVNZ & The Gang Of
31
We thought that the silly season was over, but the lead story in this morning's Herald - wherein 31 prominent New Zealanders are calling for TVNZ to become a fully public-funded broadcaster - suggests otherwise. The group say that television "used to be better" and believe that the way to turn back time is to remove the ads.
Displaying commendable restraint, we won't stoop to commenting on the characterisation of advertisers as "hijackers and abusers" - even though, as anyone with more than 30 seconds experience in the industry knows, advertisers are at the mercy of broadcasters, not the other way round.
Instead, let's ponder the potential after-effects if a TVNZ channel were to be decommercialised. For some reason, most worthy citizens seem to want Television One to be the ad-free channel -- even though the bulk of audiences under a certain age opt for TV2 as their TVNZ channel of choice. Television that "reflects life in New Zealand" is not necessarily what younger New Zealanders want to see. Ah well - we'll go with the flow.
So - zap the ads on One. If we do some back-of-the-envelope calculations based on TVNZ's last Annual Report, that probably means an annual shortfall of some $190-$200 million (i.e. roughly half TVNZ's current yearly operating expenses).
Would our 31 dignitaries prefer that money to be diverted from health, education, roading or welfare? A tax increase, perhaps? Or reintroducing the broadcasting fee? Shouldn't take more than $50 a household (factoring in the cost of fee administration and compliance) to subsidise "the channel that time forgot". Or should that money be extorted from those abusive advertisers disparaged earlier?
Actually, a large chunk of change would come out of advertiser pockets anyway. Remove Television One from the advertising inventory and you immediately create $200 million or so worth of unsatisfied demand. The remaining commercial broadcasters would immediately implement sensationalist rate increases to "satisfy" that demand.
Unfortunately, most of that "new money" would NOT go towards subsidising One - "the demands of the many (shareholders) outweigh the needs of the few (31)" - so our public service channel would still end up busking on street corners, while the crassly commercial channels enjoy a substantial windfall. Advertisers would end up paying at least a third more to hijack the same old consumers - except for those fleeing the tyranny of commercial abuse to the sanity and serenity of television as it used to be.
Perhaps someone might mention to the commercially-challenged 31 that in these enlightened times it is perfectly possible to replicate the once and future experience that was NZBC Television. Your options include:
DVDs of classic TV shows and documentaries, available at your local video shop and gloriously commercial-free;
Sky's new MySky Personal Video Recorder will allow you to capture the entire Television One schedule and then zip through the adbreaks at thirty times normal speed;
Get yourself a broadband connection and download quality content from the ABC, BBC and CBC. It's available now (from sources of dubious legality) - or wait five minutes because broadcasters all over the world are falling over themselves to turn this into a new revenue stream;
* Sign up to Sky Digital and enjoy the lightly-commercial blasts from the past on UKTV, the History Channel, the Arts Channel et al.
Unfortunately, the avowed aims of the 31 Back To The Future retro-advocates are completely at odds with informed industry perspectives such as those described in the newly-released IBM white paper "The End Of Television As We Know It". According to this well-researched view of television circa 2012:
* "Audiences are becoming increasingly fragmented, splicing their time among myriad media choices, channels and platforms. For the last few decades, consumers have migrated to more specialized, niche content via cable and multichannel offerings. Now, with the growing availability of on demand, self-programming and search features, some experiencers are moving beyond niche to individualized viewing. With increasing competition from convergence players in TV, telecommunications and the Internet, the industry is confronting unparalleled levels of complexity, dynamic change and pressure to innovate."
For the years between now and 2012, according to IBM, the television industry will be faced with two distinctly different consumer types: "While one consumer segment remains largely passive in the living room, the other will force radical change in business models in a search for anytime, anywhere content through multiple channels. The techandfashion-forward consumer segment will lead us to a world of platform-agnostic content, fluid mobility of media experiences, individualized pricing schemes and an end to the traditional concept of release windows."
Preparing for such a future will require broadcasters to:
* Segment: Invest in divergent strategies and supply chains for the different consumer types.
* Innovate: Innovate business models, pricing, windows, distribution and packaging by creating - not resisting - wider consumer choice.
* Experiment: Develop, trial, refine, roll-out. Repeat.
* Mobilize: Create seamless content mobility for users who require on-the-go experiences.
* Open: Drive open and standards-based content delivery platforms to optimize content and revenue exploitation, and to create high business flexibility and network cost-efficiency.
* Reorganise: Reassess their business composition against future requirements and identify core competencies needed for future competitive advantage.
If you'd like
an electronic copy of the IBM white paper on the global
future of television, drop us an email at
newsletter@mediacom.co.nz
If you'd prefer to see the future of NZ television as
espoused by 31 of our finest citizens, on the other hand,
head on over to http://www.nztvarchive.co.nz
Done Deal We thought we'd just close the
loop and note that Sky has indeed been cleared to acquire
Prime - obviously as a result of the point of view we
expressed in an earlier edition of this newsletter. Sky are
now starting to implement their plans for Prime; and
although details are still sketchy, here's what we know so
far: * The dots in the Prime logo are on their way out.
Why? Because they're actually celebrity dots, borrowed from
the Nine Network logo. Now that Nine is outta here, so are
the dots. * The 5.30 News is here to stay, at least for
now, but Suzy may be out. Alison Mau is tipped to front the
show, creating an interesting situation (given that hubby
Simon is fronting One News at Six). Who'll scoop who?
* Prime's content for the next six to twelve months was
pre-bought before the takeover became reality, so don't
expect much radical change in 2006 - or that's what we've
been told. We suspect that there might be a few surprises
in-store, even earlier than currently predicted.
* Prime will join its pay-tv brethren in the pages of
SkyWatch, so now we'll have the privilege of finding out
what's scheduled on Prime up to a month in advance. Be nice
if the other Free To Air (FTA) broadcasters would do
likewise. Moves are afoot to broaden Prime's coverage,
through a special low cost installation deal tapping into
Sky's network of installers throughout New Zealand: * If
you live where Prime's UHF signal is available (over 90% of
NZ), installation of a UHF aerial and tune-in will cost
$145. * If you live where Prime's UHF signal is NOT
available, you can now install a SKY Digital dish and
decoder, with the Prime Television service only, also at a
cost of $145 (and no decoder rental fee). * Or you can
install SKY Digital with the free-to-air broadcast package
(all national free-to-air television and radio channels) for
$99 including GST with a minimum 12-month decoder rental
agreement at $18.29 including GST per month. These
digital installation offers are particularly interesting and
give a little hint of Sky's strategic direction once the FTA
broadcasters drag themselves kicking and screaming into the
provision of FTA digital services. As in the UK, Sky NZ is
likely to offer multi-channel package deals with a single
upfront cost and no rental fee. With the US now committed
to a 2009 switch-off of analogue television - and Australia
contemplating a 2010 shutdown of oldstyle television - now
just might be a good time for making moves to digital.
Otherwise we'll find ourselves in the same situation in TV
as we are in broadband - way, way behind the rest of the
world. The knowledge economy turned no-legs economy
.... Newspapers: In For A Shakeup It's official: the
sleeping newsprint giants are waking up and getting ready
for an extreme makeover! The American Press Institute
last week announced a groundbreaking programme to help
selected newspapers take new business ideas from sketchbook
to marketplace. It's called Newspaper Next and it's a
year-long, $2.25 million project to discover future business
models for the newspaper industry. Newspapers who want
to be selected for this new initiative are asked to submit a
"disruptive" idea for a new product or service to be
considered for the programme. A "disruptive" idea, would-be
participants are informed, offers new benefits to the
consumer, such as simplicity, convenience, ease of use or
low price. Classic examples of disruptive innovations
include the personal computer, discount airlines and
Intuit's Turbo Tax software. The Newspaper Next
Disruptive Innovation Advisory Programme will provide
innovation guidance to three to five U.S. newspaper
companies. The selected newspapers will receive advice and
consultation from the N2 project team over a four-month
period, including two daylong sessions with the N2 project
team and weekly conference calls to review progress. The
chosen projects also will serve as practical demonstrations
of the innovation tools and processes under development in
the yearlong Newspaper Next project. The cases will be
included in the N2's final report and recommendations when
they're released. Newspapers participating in the
programme will work with: * Stephen Gray, N2 managing
director and former managing publisher of The Christian
Science Monitor * Scott Anthony, a managing director at
innovation consulting firm Innosight and co-author of Seeing
What's Next: Using the Theories of Innovation to Predict
Industry Change. For more information about the
Newspaper Next disruptive innovation programme and to
download an application, visit www.newspapernext.org
Don't You Ever Let A Chance Go By They're
called ShelfAds - and they're tiny digital video players
that detect movement and start playing a 10-second video ad
on shelf as a consumer walks by. ShelfAds, developed by
POP Broadcasting and currently being tested in the US, are
the latest attempt to bring video in-store and in-your-face
at point of purchase. According to its developers, the
ShelfAds system has also been built to integrate RFID
technologies and could one day dispense aromas as well
(scary though that thought might be). Traditional
in-store TV networks face the challenge of finding
appropriate locations within crowded supermarkets; and
they're often silent, either by design or because store
employees have turned down the volume. The ShelfAds, calling
out to you as you wander through the aisles, will either be
perceived as highly relevant and timely - or as the ambush
of a thousand tiny voices. Guess that's why it's good to
test first! If you're interested, point your browser to
http://www.popbroadcasting.com
ABOUT MEDIACOM MEDIACOM, with offices in
80 countries, is one of the world's largest and most
respected independent media planning and buying
organisations. We create media solutions that build business
for a wide range of local, regional and worldwide
clients. With $13 billion in global billings, a
commitment to strategic insight, total communications
planning, tactical media brilliance and tough but creative
media negotiating, MEDIACOM provides unsurpassed value in
today's chaotic media marketplace. ENDS