Newsletter Provides Project Update
MEDIA RELEASE
Newsletter Provides Project
Update
20 May 2008 – Holcim (New Zealand) Ltd is
this week circulating a further newsletter to approximately
8,000 Oamaru residents to keep them updated on the progress
of the proposed cement plant near Weston.
The
newsletter outlines the outcome of the Environment Court
pre-hearing conference held on 28 April at which Judge
Jackson indicated that a hearing date would be dependent on
the designation of the railway line between Waiareka and the
proposed plant site being resolved. The hearing for that
rail designation starts on Wednesday.
“Depending
on the timeframe around the rail designation process, a last
quarter 2008 hearing for the plant appeal is still
possible,” said Ken Cowie, Holcim Capital Projects
Manager. “We’re committed to the hearing process; at
the same time we want to minimise the period of uncertainty
for the relevant communities and staff.”
A recent
review has been carried out to update costings associated
with the project, which were originally done in 2005.
Including the plant, associated quarries and pits, a new
ship for cement distribution and related national
distribution systems, the cost is now estimated to be $400 -
$500 million. Of this the plant is expected to cost more
than $300 million.
“Updated costs for the
Westport option are still being finalised,” said Ken
Cowie. “We expect they will increase by the same order of
magnitude. These revised costings don’t affect our
ranking of a new Oamaru plant as our preferred
option.”
In April, the company presented its
submission to Government’s Finance and Expenditure Select
Committee on the Climate Change (Emissions Trading and
Renewable Preference) Bill. Managing Director Jeremy Smith
told the Select Committee that, while the company strongly
endorses Government's decision to establish a carbon
emissions trading regime as a way to help New Zealand reduce
its greenhouse gas emissions, Holcim New Zealand would not
recommend that its parent company invest in the new cement
plant with the Bill in its original form because it did not
encourage the company to invest in low emissions technology.
In recent weeks several amendments to the Bill have been
proposed. The company continues to have positive
engagement with the Government on this
issue.
ends