Home loan affordability worsens after rise in interest rates
NZ home loan affordability worsens after rise in interest rates
Home loan affordability worsened slightly across most of New Zealand in May as a rise in interest rates more than offset a small fall in median house prices.
The Roost Home Loan Affordability Reports showed a deterioration in 16 of 24 regions, including on the North Shore of Auckland, which reclaimed the title of the being the least affordable area for first home buyers in New Zealand.
A 0.5% fall in the national median house price in May from April was not enough to compensate for the two increases in the Official Cash Rate in March and April. Advertised floating mortgage rates rose almost half a per cent to around 6.25% in the first six months of 2014. They have since risen another 0.25%.
The Roost Home Loan Affordability reports showed improvements in the month in 8 of the 24 regions measured. The Roost reports have been referred to repeatedly in and out of Parliament in recent months as the debate over housing affordability heats up before the September 20 election.
Banks have been more aggressive in recent months in offering cut-rate longer-term fixed mortgage rate deals, passing on the benefits of low international and local funding costs. Average two year fixed mortgage rates fell 13 basis points to almost 6% in May, taking two year rates well below floating rates on 6.25% by the end of May. Floating rates have since risen to around 6.5%.
"The shift in longer term fixed rates to substantially below floating rates has changed the landscape for borrowers," said Roost Home Loans spokeswoman Colleen Dennehy. "Talking to a mortgage broker can help a borrower consider their options, and get the best deal out of a bank," Dennehy said.
The Roost Home Loan Affordability reports show national affordability deteriorated to 63.1% in May from 62.5% in April after the national median house price fell to NZ$432,000 from NZ$432,250 and the average floating mortgage rate rose to 6.23% from 6.05% a month earlier.
The Roost Home Loan Affordability reports for May showed affordability for regular home buyers worsened in 16 cities and regions, including Central Auckland, Whangarei, Tauranga, Hamilton, Wellington City, Christchurch, Dunedin and Queenstown. But they improved in Manukau, Gisborne, New Plymouth, Nelson and Invercargill.
Click for big version.
It was toughest for first home buyers on the North Shore of Auckland, which reclaimed its mantle as the most expensive area relative to incomes from Manukau in April. It took 109.9% of a single median after tax income to afford a first quartile priced house on the North Shore, up from 103.1% the previous month.
Housing affordability has become a major economic and political issue over the last 18 months. The Reserve Bank and Government agreed on a toolkit of 'macro-prudential' controls a year ago that would see the central bank impose limits growth in high LVR mortgages and force banks to hold more capital. Central and local governments are also moving to address housing supply shortages. The Reserve Bank's speed limit was applied on October 1 and it said in its June Monetary Policy Statement it appeared to have worked to reduce house price inflation by around 2.5 percentage points.
For first home buyers – which in this Roost index are defined as a 25-29 year old who buys a first quartile home – there was a worsening in affordability in 13 of the 24 regions covered and the national measure also worsened.
It took 51.3% of a single first home buyer's income to afford a first quartile priced house nationally, up from 51.2% a month earlier. The most affordable city for first home buyers was Wanganui, where it took 19.7% of a young person's disposable income to afford a first quartile home. The least affordable was North Shore at 109.9%.
Any level over 40% is considered unaffordable, whereas any level closer to 30% has coincided with increased buyer demand in the past.
For working households, the situation is similar, although bringing two incomes to the job of paying for a mortgage makes life considerably easier. A household with two incomes would typically have had to use 41.4% of their after tax pay in May to service the mortgage on a median priced house. This is up from 41.0% the previous month.
On this basis, most smaller New Zealand cities have a household affordability index below 40% for couples in the 30-34 age group. This household is assumed to have one 5 year old child.
For first-home buying households in the 25-29 age group (which are assumed to have no children), affordability nationally worsened to 24.9% of after tax income in households with two incomes required to service the debt, up from 24.8% the previous month. The lower quartile house price fell to NZ$287,000 from NZ$290,000 the previous month.
Any level over 30% is considered unaffordable in the longer term for such a household, while any level closer to 20% is seen as attractive and coinciding with strong demand.
First home buyer household affordability is measured by calculating the proportion of after tax pay needed by two young median income earners to service an 80% home loan on a first quartile priced house.
Roost Home loan
affordability for typical buyers
General/New
Zealand Report: www.interest.co.nz/property/home-loan-affordability
Links
to individual reports for regions can be found here
Roost Home loan
affordability for first-home buyers
General/New
Zealand Report: http://www.interest.co.nz/first-home-buyer
Links
to individual reports for regions can be found here
Question and Answers about the report
How does
interest.co.nz work out these
numbers?
Interest.co.nz gathers data from
Statistics New Zealand and IRD on wages in each region, data
from the Real Estate Institute from each region each month,
and data from banks and non-banks on interest rates. It has
calculated home loan affordability going back to the
beginning of 2002.
How is this survey different
from the Massey University survey of
affordability?
The Massey study is only done
quarterly rather than monthly and uses an index of Home
affordability rather than actually measuring home loan
affordability. It uses an index rather than the actual
measure of the proportion of after tax pay needed to service
an 80% mortgage on a median home. The exact composition and
meaning of the index is not detailed.
Why use a
single median income rather than household
income?
It’s true that most homebuyers are
using a combination of one or more full or part time incomes
to service their mortgage. Each household is different and
may be using incomes from different sources. The best
measure of average national household income is calculated
officially once in every three years by Statistics New
Zealand. Interest.co.nz chose to use the median income data
series from IRD and Statistics NZ because it can be measured
monthly and can be drilled down by region and by age. We do
include a chart showing how many median incomes are required
to keep mortgage payments at 40% of take home pay. It is
currently around 2 median incomes.
Why is home
loan affordability important?
It is a useful way
to work out if a housing market is overvalued. It’s clear
house prices stopped rising when the national affordability
ratio rose above 80% or 2 median incomes to service the
average home loan. It’s a way of comparing affordability
of housing markets with a national average and comparing
housing values from one year to the next. For example, the
affordability ratio in 2002 before the housing boom really
took off was around 41%.
About
Roost
Roost is the sponsor of this Report, and
the Reports must be referred to as the Roost home
loan affordability reports. Roost, owned by AMP, is
one of New Zealand’s largest independent home loan and
investment property mortgage brokers with 16 franchisees
nationwide. Roost offers to source the perfect loan for its
customers from a panel of lenders and insurance advice from
Roost insurance specialists. Roost was established in 1996.
For more information please visit www.roost.co.nz
ENDS