NZ renters are not more vulnerable
NZ renters are not more vulnerable
Auckland, NZ, 31st
July 2014
The Auckland Property Investors’
Association (APIA) rejects characterisation by the New
Zealand Institute Of Economic Research (NZIER) of New
Zealand being ‘one of the least renter-friendly regimes in
the OECD’.
‘The NZIER takes an euro-centric view
of residential tenancy which simply bears no cultural
reference to the ordinary Kiwi renters.’ says Andrew
Bruce, President of APIA.
By alleging that renters
are denied the security of long term tenancies, the NZIER
grossly underplays the attraction of transitionary tenures.
‘Yes, tenants renting executive-style properties usually
are after longer fixed-term agreements. However, for your
run-of-the-mill renting, tenants like to be able to move
more quickly in response to job opportunities and changing
personal circumstances. It is out of touch to suggest that
tenants do not value this type of flexibility.'
The
NZIER claims that the short notice requirement in this
country makes it too easy for landlords to terminate
tenancies. ‘That is incorrect,’ says Bruce, ‘The
Residential Tenancies Act requires landlords to give 90 days
notice to terminate in most instances, while tenants only
need to give 21 days notice. To me that put tenants in a
more flexible, and powerful, position than their
landlords.’
Although renters need landlord consent
to make minor property customisations, the Residential
Tenancies Act forbids that consent to be unreasonably
withheld. In pointing out that some European countries make
it easier for renters to alter their homes, the NZIER has
failed to understand that rental properties are supplied on
a different basis in New Zealand. Bruce explains, ’You
are simply not comparing apples with apples. The reason why
minor alterations are the norm in some European countries is
because many rental properties do not come with carpets or
kitchen units. That is not the case here. With proper
communication, you will find that most NZ landlords are
amenable to work being done on the property if it means
keeping a good tenant on the property for longer.‘
While the APIA continues to welcome productive
conversations with the tenant community on ways landlords
can provide even better accommodation services, it rejects
any suggestions that NZ renters are vulnerable and
disadvantaged.
Auckland Property Investors’
Association
Auckland, New Zealand www.apia.org.nz - media@apia.org.nz
END