Chapman Tripp - Brief Counsel
Chapman Tripp - Brief Counsel
New health and safety regime from 4 April next year
28 August 2015
The Health and Safety at Work Act has now been passed by Parliament and will come into effect on 4 April next year – five and a half years since the Pike River Mine disaster which precipitated the reform.
The aim is to encourage a pro-active and participative health and safety culture in our workforce, in line with the recommendations of the Health and Safety Taskforce and the Royal Commission report into Pike River.
Some changes were made to the initial Bill as it progressed through the House, which the Opposition parties consider will weaken it. But the new regime will still be a significant improvement on what we have now.
We outline the new structure.
Penalties
The
new Act has much bigger teeth than the existing legislation
– providing more enforcement options and tougher
penalties.
Infringement notices with ‘on the spot’
fines will be available for:
minor breaches that warrant
more than a warning but less than a prosecution,
and
actions or omissions that involve straightforward
issues of fact, and do not include qualifying phrases (such
as “so far as is easily practicable” or “reasonable
steps”).
The Act establishes a three tier approach for
offences:
Category 1 - reckless conduct; fines up to
$600,000 for a director and/or five years in
jail
Category 2 - exposing a person to serious harm; up
to $300,000
Category 3 – breach of duty; up to
$100,000.
The officer
The definition of officer has
been fine-tuned through the legislative process and is now
designed to capture directors and very senior managers –
which, in all but the largest firms, is likely to be just
the Chief Executive.
Officers have a positive duty of due
diligence which requires them to “take all reasonable
steps” to ensure that the PCBU (Person Conducting a
Business or Undertaking – this will generally be the
company or the employing organisation), is fulfilling the
organisation’s obligations under the law.
For
directors, the duties will be similar to the discipline they
have traditionally applied to managing financial risk and
will include:
maintaining an up-to-date knowledge of
workplace health and safety matters
understanding the
nature of the operations of the business and any associated
risks and hazards, and
ensuring and verifying that the
PCBU has access to, and uses, the resources, information and
processes needed to eliminate or – if elimination is not
possible – to minimise safety risks.
The Act does not
move liability from the company to its officers as the main
duty of care will sit with the PCBU.
Currently a director
or officer can be held liable for a fine of up to $500,000
and imprisonment for up to two years if they knowingly
“directed, authorised, assented to, acquiesced in, or
participated in, the failure” to take all practicable
steps.
Less serious offences, where the director does not
intend to create the offence and had no knowledge of it, are
presently limited to penalties of $250,000.
It has been
rare for a director to be charged under the current Act, and
those that have been were directors of very small
businesses.
Officers will be subject to the same
penalties as PCBUs under the new Act.
Responsibilities
of the PCBU
The PCBU is required to ensure the health and
safety of those who work for the PCBU and those who could be
put at risk by that work. Where there are multiple PCBUs on
a site and an overlap of duties, PCBUs must discharge their
overlapping responsibilities to the extent they have the
ability to control the matter. They must also consult,
cooperate and coordinate their activities with the other
PCBUs.
In high risk industries, the PCBU will have to
establish a formal risk management process. This will
require:
identifying all reasonably foreseeable
hazards
involving workers and their representatives in
developing the risk mitigation strategy
eliminating or
minimising the risk so far as is reasonably practicable
by:
substituting the hazard with something less hazardous
and/or
isolating the hazard from any person who could be
exposed to it and/or
implementing engineering controls,
and if a risk still remains
putting in place
administrative controls (work methods or procedures) or
providing personal protective equipment, and
regularly
reviewing the control measures to ensure they remain
effective over time.
Workforce participation
All PCBUs
have the right to appoint H&S representatives and/or H&S
committees should they wish. PCBUs employing more than 20
people, and all businesses in sectors with moderate to high
risk of injury, are obliged to provide this representation
if requested to do so by the workforce.
Regulations will
specify, among other things:
the criteria for electing an
H&S representative, the training to be provided, the term of
office (three years) and procedures to terminate an
appointment
the process for determining the configuration
of work groups (these must be negotiated between the PCBU
and workers, and must be designed to ensure that workers’
H&S interests are represented effectively and efficiently,
and that H&S representatives are readily accessible to each
worker in the group), and
the composition and meeting
requirements of H&S committees (they must be at least half
composed of workers not nominated by the PCBU, and the
committees must meet at least every three months, or at any
reasonable time requested by least half of the committee
members).
Smaller businesses (20 or fewer workers) in low
risk industries do not have to appoint an H&S
representative. PCBUs which meet the size test will be
excluded from the exemption where there is:
a risk of a
catastrophic event causing multiple deaths
a fatality
rate greater than 25 per 100,000 workers
a serious injury
rate in excess of 25 per 1000 workers, or
a likelihood of
exposure to asbestos or silica.
Commencement of 4 April
2016
The new regime will come into force from 4 April 2016. From that date, duty holders will be expected to be compliant. There is no transition period. Accordingly, businesses and individual officers should be taking the time now to review their health and safety regimes to ensure that they will be best placed to meet the new regime.
ends