Shipping Federation on Emissions & low sulphur fuel
Fact Sheet on NZ issues relating to
• IMO Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Tier
III
• MARPOL Annex VI and Sulphur
Oxide (SOx)
The
purpose of this factsheet is to assist anyone interested in
this issue but not familiar with the operation of SOLAS
vessels.
IMO NOx
Tier III
• IMO Tier III requirements apply to
new vessels and engines built since 1 January 2016.
Technically, the trigger is keel-laying after 1 January 2016
and an engine output of greater than 130kW. Earlier vessels
are generally subject to Tier II requirements.
• The
difference between the Tier II and Tier III is a reduction
in the production of NOx by approximately 76%.
• It is
expected that any vessels being constructed today will meet
Tier III requirements because this is needed for
international voyages and impacts on resale
value.
MARPOL
VI
• As measured by the volume of cargo
carried, 88 out of 172 IMO member states have signed up to
MARPOL Annex VI, representing 96% of World
tonnage.
o Lots of individual countries have not signed
but they do not have significant cargo volumes.
o Most of
the SOLAS vessels on the NZ-international circuit are
flagged to countries that have signed MARPOL Annex
VI
o MoT has commenced engagement with the sector and
will commence cost-benefit analysis on the implications of
acceding to Annex VI. If the engagement and analysis
supports the case for accession, a formal National Interest
Analysis will be carried out, informed by public
consultation, with recommendations to Cabinet.
• Annex
VI seeks to control SOx emissions through limitations on the
sulphur content of marine fuels.
• The sulphur content
limits set by the annex are
o January 2012 3.5% by
mass
o January 2020 0.5% by mass
• Within the
Annex, certain areas of the globe have been designated
Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECA’s). Since 1 January
2015 the sulphur limit for fuel oil used by ships in these
areas has been limited to 0.10% by mass.
• Note that
there are health issues in respect of SOx but MARPOL does
not specifically address particulate
emissions.
• Australia has signed the Annex. It already
imports most of its fuel and is expected to import 0.5% fuel
when the lower requirements come
in.
The refinery and availability of
low sulphur fuels
• SOLAS vessels in NZ are
generally using no greater than 3.5% fuel, either because of
the Annex or as a commercial decision. The fuel produced by
the NZ refinery is approximately 1.9 – 2.8% (depending on
viscosity/grade) and any vessel bunkering in NZ will be
using this.
• Note that fishing vessels and
recreational vessels use automotive gas oil (known as AGO
i.e., fuel available at gas stations that goes in trucks and
cars) so they are not part of this discussion.).
• The
refinery does not blend marine diesel oil (MDO). MDO is a
blend of AGO mixed with light fuel oil to create a fuel that
does not require heating but is cheaper than
AGO.
• Retooling the Marsden Point refinery to produce
low sulphur fuel
• The cost of retooling Marsden Point
to convert all high-sulphur residues to MARPOL-compliant
product will be high and prohibitively expensive.
• The refinery is currently exploring if it is
possible to produce smaller volumes of 0.5% sulphur fuel,
and what may be required to achieve this. This has not yet
been fully scoped nor costed.
• Whether Marsden Point
eventually produces low SOx fuel will be a commercial
decision for the refinery.
• Currently, high sulphur
by-products from refining have commercial value to Marsden
Point. Once the 0.5 % sulphur requirement comes into force,
this situation may change, affecting the refinery’s
business model in this regard. In the event that there is a
major shift to low SOx fuels, there is an open question as
to how the high sulphur residues will be disposed of or
used.
Fuel usage in
practice
• Ministry of Transport officials
believe that IMO sulphur fuel requirements will not affect
domestic shipping until such time as New Zealand accedes to
Annex VI, should Government make such a decision.
Federation members do not agree. If the rest of the world
moves to implement Annex VI, then the fuel companies, as
global players, will respond and supply fuels accordingly.
NZ is a very small fish at the end of the supply chain, we
will be affected by Annex VI, irrespective of NZ government
decisions.
• Regardless of what NZ does, SOLAS
vessels going internationally will need to comply with the
requirements of the state they are visiting. Port State
Control has the power to enforce this under ‘no more
favourable treatment’ provisions. Coastal ships going to
Sydney or Singapore, typically for survey or repair can be
affected by this.
• Federation members are already
making decisions in response to MAROL Annex VI. Factors to
be considered include assumed availability of fuels, supply
infrastructure, costs and the operating requirements (such
as heating and filtration) of particular engines. In some
cases, decisions have already been made to operate using
diesel.
• There has been some discussion in the media
about vessels using a variety of fuels.
• Because
vessels have multiple tanks, the opportunity for fuel
switching exists.
• It is very unlikely that ships of
Ratifying States will carry higher sulphur fuels for use in
the waters of non-party States or in international waters.
This is because IMO sulphur limits apply to fuels used in
territorial waters of Annex VI Contracting States and ships
of Ratifying States on the High Seas.
The future
and the policy picture
• The maritime sector
experience is that every time NZ deviates from accepted
international regulation, it makes it harder for vessel
operators to comply, not easier. If there is one set of
rules for trading coastal, and then another set when the
same vessels go outside of New Zealand’s EEZ, there can be
additional costs and confusion
• Even if NZ does not
sign up to Annex VI, all international ships calling here
will still need to comply with the requirements, and all New
Zealand based ships (coastal vessels) travelling
internationally, will still need to comply. As such, the
vast majority of fuel supplied to ships in NZ, will need to
be compliant with the 0.5% sulphur cap. Only a small
portion of fuel would be exempt from this limit.
• As
Annex VI stands, there are two routes to compliance.
o
Vessel operators can continue to use high sulphur fuels
(above the 0.5% cap), but need to have fitted an exhaust gas
treatment system (also known as “scrubbers”). This is
generally considered to be uneconomic for the current New
Zealand coastal fleet. Retro-fitting scrubbers on existing
vessels poses significant practical problems, for example
because of their size and the complexity of incorporating
them into the engine system. Scrubbers have not been widely
implemented on international trading
ships. Or,
o Vessels operators
can use fuels with less than 0.5% sulphur content. At this
time, the only fuel available in NZ that meets this
specification is diesel. In NZ, there is only one grade of
diesel supplied by the refinery for all users – marine and
road going. This is relatively expensive amounting to
approximately up to 50% higher cost.
The actual cost increase to each user varies and is
confidential.
• None of the fuel companies have yet
stated what fuels they propose to supply post 1 Jan 2020.
We believe that most of them will be waiting to see if IMO
adhere to this date or defer implementation to 2025.
However, it seems unlikely that they would simultaneously
supply both high and low sulphur grades of fuel in the NZ
market.
• Any low sulphur fuel is almost certain to be
imported from Singapore as costs to modify Marsden Point to
produce this are likely to be prohibitive. However, Refining
NZ is still evaluating whether the supply of some 0.5%
bunker fuel is possible.
• Ships, and the fuel
infrastructure that supplies them, are long term assets.
Both ship owners and fuel companies need certainty of policy
to ensure that good investment choices are
made.
Terms explained: Marine Diesel Oil
(MDO) & Intermediate Fuel Oil (IFO)
https://www.marquard-bahls.com/en/news-info/glossary/detail/term/marine-diesel-oil-mdo.html