Lack of decision support tools in forestry
Recent comments by officials and “experts” on planting one billion trees, the plight of hill country forestry and woody debris flows, have not touched on the total lack of decision support tools so that farmers and other local forest investors can make the right decisions. Without engaging a costly consultant, farmers are expected to take a risk on a 25-year land commitment in an information vacuum.
Unlike the plethora of levy and
government funded systems and tools available to farmers on
agricultural decisions, there is next to nothing on
forestry. The forest grower levy is mostly consumed by
overseas owned forestry corporates looking to protect and
enhance their assets, to maintain a social license to
operate in a foreign land. As a result the forest levy
doesn’t get spent expanding a local forest
industry.
Despite 60 years of New Zealand forestry
research, current decision support tools and predictive
models are not accessible to farmers or are too complex to
use easily. This is a significant impediment to helping
farmers and other forest investors understand the basic
drivers of forest profitability and importantly the risks
and costs associated with steep or remote sites.
The
much over used and parroted phrase “the right tree, in the
right place, for the right reason” doesn’t really help
land owners, or the government, move forward and find
answers. Is there anyone on the Minister of Forest’s
Advisory Group with a forestry qualification or the farm
advisory experience to highlight and help address this
fundamental impediment? With modern IT systems, support on
land use decisions is very possible, e.g. a web-based system
that integrates farm maps, land resource information, farm
plans and forestry options to provide both economic and
environmental risk
analysis.
ENDS