Research Shows Board Directors Hampered By Compliance Issues
As most
board activities are commercially sensitive, private and
confidential, there has been virtually no research on this
issue. But an article entitled Board Directors and
the Swamp of Compliance by Emeritus Professor Kerr
Inkson of the University of Auckland, which was a finalist
in the Business Research Translation Competition, reports
interviews with 60 directors. This included 35 CEOs and 25
board chairs from the same companies, across a range of
industries and firm ownership types, including commercial
companies, public services and
not-for-profits. Inkson’s collaborators in the
original research
were Brigid Carroll of the University of Auckland and Coral
Ingley of AUT. Board directors are key to business
performance. and have special abilities, experience and
networks to offer. But what do they see as their role? And
what do they actually do? Are they controllers, ensuring
that their organisation meets its statutory obligations and
safeguards shareholders’ interests? Or are they
strategists and leaders who use their abilities, experience
and networks to guide, inspire and innovate? “By
interviewing a large number of NZ board directors, we were
able to determine their mind-sets - broad patterns of
thinking that determine actions - concerning their
governance roles and experiences,” says Inkson. The
research found that in practice compliance-related tasks
often took over meetings, dominating both time and talk, and
ensuring that more time was spent on those issues rather
than on strategic direction. Thus, while involvement
in strategy and leadership represented an ideal for
directors, concerns about compliance and control – the
statutory requirements of the board – made the ideal
almost impossible to attain. This indicated a conflict
between the directors’ compliance and strategy mind-sets.
To the researchers’ surprise this contradiction didn’t
just apply to some types of board but to virtually all of
them. “Many boards members have huge energy, talent,
and networks but their assets are wasted by confining them
to important but mundane compliance tasks,” says
Inkson. Most participants could clearly identify the
problem but did not know the solution. “Directors
need to reflect seriously on what they honour and lead their
organisation by reframing the strategy/leadership mind-set
as a complement to their compliance mind-set,” says
Inkson. “This will enable boards to make the strategic and
leadership contributions that create real stakeholder
value.”. Should
board directors contribute to strategy and leadership?
Research from the University of Auckland Business School
indicates that directors want to but feel hampered by
compliance issues.