New Zealand Economists Provide Inflation Warnings Ahead Of RBNZ OCR Decision
In the leadup to today’s Official Cash Rate decision, New Zealand’s economists warn that inflation expectations are unhinged and that government deficits are worsening the problem.
They also remind us that New Zealand cannot maintain current employment levels by accepting high inflation rates.
This morning, the New Zealand Association of Economists released the results of its latest member survey, which asked members about inflation.
Members were first asked whether, despite current inflation rates, inflation expectations remain well-anchored within the RBNZ’s target band of 1-3 percent over the medium term. The majority of respondents strongly disagreed (34%) or disagreed (37%) that inflation expectations remain well-anchored. Only 13% agreed that inflation expectations remain anchored.
The question also revealed a stark difference between academic economists and government-employed economists. Sixty percent of academic economists strongly disagree, and a further twenty-five percent disagree that inflation expectations are anchored. Meanwhile, about half of the government’s economists either agree that inflation expectations are anchored or were uncertain.
The survey also showed that strong majorities of economists agree (47%) or strongly agree (29%) that a faster return to fiscal surpluses would ease pressure on prices, so smaller increases in the OCR would be needed to return inflation to target. Only 9% disagreed.
Finally, the survey showed that despite some pundits’ assertions that inflation is a small price to pay for high employment levels, economists believe that there is no tradeoff between the two over the longer term. A strong majority either agreed (36%) or strongly agreed (33%) that employment would decline from current peaks even if inflation were maintained at 7% over the longer term.
New Zealand Initiative Chief Economist Dr Eric Crampton said, in response to the survey findings, “The Reserve Bank and government spending have put us into a difficult spot. The Bank does not just have to fight inflation and push back against the effects of substantial inappropriate fiscal stimulus. It also has to fight to rebuild its credibility as an inflation-fighter, to re-anchor inflation expectations after years of diverted priorities.”
He continued, “Many economic
commentators have forgotten, or pretend to have forgotten,
or never understood a basic bit of macroeconomics. There
isn’t a long-term trade-off between inflation and
unemployment. We cannot buy long-term high employment rates
by accepting 7% inflation rates. We can only buy permanently
higher inflation rates, and a return to higher unemployment
rates.”