Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Subcontractors Are Entitled To Health And Safety Too

WorkSafe New Zealand says workers deserve better than to continue dying on the job in falls from height.

A Canterbury business, Dan’s Renovations, has been sentenced for health and safety failings over the death of a subcontractor in February 2021. The 56-year-old man was painting the flat, one-storey roof when he fatally fell 4.5 metres to the ground.

In a reserved decision, Judge Gerard Lynch has described the death as having a “devastating and multidimensional impact…felt across generations” for the victim’s family.

Dan’s Renovations did not have significant experience of working at heights.

WorkSafe’s investigation also found there was no site-specific safety plan in place, and no edge protection (for example, scaffolding) installed around the perimeter of the building in Sydenham. As a result, four workers, including the victim, were exposed to the risk of injury or death.

“This incident is proof that a flat roof does not mean a safe roof – especially when it’s 4.5 metres high. This was an unprotected and unsafe working environment,” says WorkSafe’s Head of Specialist Interventions, Dr Catherine Gardner.

“Lead contractors owe all workers onsite a duty of care, whether they’re subcontractors or your own staff. Lead contractors must ensure the risks are being controlled to ensure everyone’s safety.

“Everybody knows the dangers of working at height. The expectations are well established and exist for a reason so they need to be followed,” says Dr Gardner.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Read the good practice guidelines for working on roofs
Read more about WorkSafe prosecutions

Background:

  • Dan’s Renovations was sentenced in a reserved decision from Judge Gerard Lynch of the Christchurch District Court.
  • Reparations of $261,695 were ordered, and a fine of $37,500 imposed
  • Dan’s Renovations was charged under sections 36(1)(a), s 48(1) and (2)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015.
    • being a PCBU, having a duty to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable, the health and safety of workers who work for the PCBU, while the workers are at work in the business carrying out roof repairs and repainting, did fail to comply with that duty and that failure exposed individuals to a risk of death or serious injury arising from a fall from height.
  • The maximum penalty is a fine not exceeding $1.5 million.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.