AUS Tertiary Update
Figures confirm salary
erosion
Discredited figures used by the New Zealand Vice
Chancellors’ Committee to subdue salary claims made by the
AUS have been replaced after a complaint about their
accuracy by the AUS. The new figures show that the
purchasing power of New Zealand academic salaries has
deteriorated significantly against Australian salaries since
a previous survey in 2001, but has improved slightly against
salaries in Canada and the UK.
Following a complaint by
AUS, the Association of Commonwealth Universities’ (ACU)
withdrew a survey of academic staff salaries and benefits in
7 commonwealth countries from their website and aplogised
for their lack of accuracy. In an email to AUS they say that
the original report did not go through the proper quality
assurance process, resulting in a serious oversight on their
part.
Figures, converted to $US, from 45 universities in
the 7 countries compared have now been recalculated and
posted on the ACU website using Purchasing Power Parity
(PPP) conversion factor. They show a lecturer at the top of
the scale in New Zealand in 2002 having the purchasing power
of $US40,962 ($US38,720 in 2001) while an Australian has
$US52,446 ($US45,488). A Professor at the bottom of the New
Zealand salary range has the purchasing power equivalent of
$US63,610 ($US60,220) while an Australian counterpart would
have $US83,463 ($US72,441).
Previous ACU surveys have
utilized PPP factors published by the OECD, however the
latest OECD PPP factors were not available for all
commonwealth countries in this survey. Instead, the ACU have
used the Economist Big Mac Currency Index for the current
survey.
The revised report concludes that while the
difference between salaries in the 7 countries is most
pronounced at professorial level, the overall difference
between the top and bottom has reduced, indicating a growing
awareness of competition and of developing salary
standardization for institutions that draw on the same
academic pool for their teaching staff.
AUS National
President. Dr Bill Rosenberg, said that while AUS has
reservations about using either the OECD or Big Mac
purchasing power parity models, both show that the disparity
between conditions of employment between New Zealand and
Australian had reached a significant and unacceptable level.
He said measures to address the salary gap would be strongly
promoted in the salary claim advanced by AUS during national
negotiations.
Also in Tertiary Update this
week
1. Questions over academic freedom
claim
2. Student debt passes $6 billion
3. More
funding for tertiary strategy initiatives
4. Funding
review to look at anomalies in tertiary course
costs
5. AUS publications on line
6. UK pay offer
rejected
7. Top 19 may set own pay agenda
Questions
over academic freedom claim
Questions have been raised
over allegations made by Canterbury lecturer, Dr Thomas
Fudge, that his academic freedom has been suppressed with
the decision of the University to withdraw 500 copies of the
History Department journal, History Now.
The allegations
were made last week after the journal, containing an article
by Dr Fudge about the fate of a former Canterbury student
who had published a Masters thesis questioning the validity
of holocaust history, was withdrawn from publication. Dr
Fudge labeled the action as breaching academic freedom and
has told Tertiary Update he has resigned from the University
in protest.
Responding to the allegations, the Head of
History at Canterbury, Professor Peter Hempenstall, said the
issue was not one of academic freedom but of a basic failure
of respect for colleagues’ views, and a failure to give them
a reasonable opportunity to defend themselves at the proper
moment.
Possible inaccuracies and misleading statements,
the use of internal documents without clearance, and the
naming of specific individuals and businesses, which could
expose the University to legal action, were cited as
principal reasons for the withdrawal.
He said there was
“overwhelming agreement within the Department” that an
article of such a sensitive nature should have been run past
the Editorial Board before publication in a house journal.
“This is the kind of professional and collegial
responsibility on which academic culture and its conventions
are built. Without them there is no academic freedom,
responsibly exercised”.
Professor Hempenstall said that
academic freedom goes hand-in-hand with ethical
responsibility. “In this case the censorship occurred right
at the beginning, when people were named and whose behaviour
was being commented upon were king-hit from behind without
being given a chance to face the author,” he said.
He
said the staff were currently looking at ways in which the
issue could be discussed further and resolved within the
department.
Student debt passes $6 billion
Student debt
is now past the $6 billion mark according to the government
response to an official information request from the New
Zealand University Students' Association (NZUSA). Students
are calling on the government to ease the debt burden by
immediately introducing a living allowance for all students.
"Six billion dollars of debt is a disgrace to a
government that say they want a knowledge economy and
society," said Fleur Fitzsimons, Co-President of NZUSA.
"Urgent action is required, the government must use the long
awaited student support review to deliver on their
promises."
"The best way to ensure that student debt
does not continue increasing dramatically every year is to
introduce a living allowance for all students to ensure that
students do not have to rely on the harsh and unfair student
loan scheme to survive"
Student debt will reach $20
billion by 2020. One in ten New Zealanders now has a student
loan.
Funding review to look at anomalies in tertiary
course costs
A review of the costs involved of running
some tertiary education courses has been announced by Steve
Maharey, Minister responsible for the Tertiary Education
Commission. The Funding Category Review will concentrate on
areas of high strategic relevance where significant funding
and cost anomalies are believed to exist.
The review
follows a scoping study by sector experts into the
relativity of funding of different areas in the tertiary
sector which identified that some courses were potentially
under funded relative to others.
The review will be a
joint project between the Ministry of Education and the
Tertiary Education Commission and will begin shortly. Any
changes resulting from the review will be announced as part
of the 2004 Budget and implemented from the 2005 academic
year.
More funding for tertiary strategy
initiatives
The Government has announced it is making
$77.8 million additional funding available to tertiary
education organisations for special initiatives to help
fulfil aspects of the Tertiary Education Strategy.
$20
million will be available through an Innovation and
Development Fund (IDF) which has been set up as part of a
push to develop better capability within tertiary education
organisations, and $14 million will be available through the
e-Learning Collaborative Development Fund (eCDF). A further
$9.8 million will support the development of e-learning and
tertiary education portals, and the remaining $34 million
will be available for future projects.
The eCDF and IDF
are contestable funds with clear parameters and specific
eligibility criteria, including alignment to the Tertiary
Education Strategy. The funds will be open to application
between 4 August and 26 September 2003, and decisions will
be made by the end of the year.
Background information is
currently available on the Tertiary Education Commission
website, www.tec.govt.nz . Application forms will be
available on the site from Monday.
AUS publications on
line
The latest issues of AUS publications are now
available on-line. The Bulletin can be found at
www.aus.ac.nz/bulletin.pdf ; and He Paku Korero can be found
at www.aus.ac.nz/hepakukorero.pdf .
Worldwatch
UK pay
offer rejected
The Association of University Teachers
(AUT) has rejected the pay deal offered by UK higher
education employers, reported in Tertiary Update last week.
AUT’s Executive Committee has sent negotiators back to the
table in an attempt to secure a better deal.
AUT General
Secretary, Sally Hunt, said the two year pay deal (6.44%)
would have been only slightly ahead of inflation and would
have made only a “tiny dint” in the estimated 28% required
to make up salary erosion over the last decade.
Sally
Hunt said that under the banner of modernisation the
employers were seeking to make fundamental changes to salary
structures which would not be in the interests of staff. She
said that while the AUT supported a modernisation agenda it
must be based around better managed resources, greater
transparency and equality of pay and opportunity for
all.
Details of the offer and unions’ position can be
found on the AUT website, www.aut.org.uk
Top 19 may set
own pay agenda
Top British universities may break ranks
with the rest of the nation's higher education institutions
by setting their own policy on issues such as academic pay
and student tuition fees. The move could see the Russell
Group, representing the vice-chancellors and principals of
19 of the country's biggest and best research and teaching
institutions, introduce policies on preferential pay to
attract top academics. It would also campaign for higher
student fees to reflect the quality of learning at member
institutions.
The move has angered other
vice-chancellors, but the group is worried that its concerns
over issues such as pay, fees and research funding are not
best served by continuing to abide by policy set by
Universities UK, which represents all UK universities and
some other higher education institutions.
Most Russell
Group members would like to have seen the cap for top-up
fees, to be introduced in 2006, set at £5,000 not the
government-imposed £3,000. They said the higher figure could
help create a genuine market where universities, including
many in the Russell Group, felt able to discount their
courses.
*******************************************************************************
AUS
Tertiary Update is compiled weekly on Thursdays and
distributed freely to members of the union and others. Back
issues are archived on the AUS website:
http://www.aus.ac.nz. Direct enquires to Marty Braithwaite,
AUS Communications Officer, email:
marty.braithwaite@aus.ac.nz