AUS Tertiary Update
Otago staff
“suspended”
Academic and general staff at the University
of Otago were issued with suspension notices yesterday
afternoon, less than twenty four hours before they were due
to walk off the job in protest at deadlocked pay
negotiations.
On Monday this week Otago staff voted by
408 votes to 93 to take strike action this afternoon, and
gave the unions’ bargaining team power to call further
“rolling action”, including withholding exam marks. The vote
occurred after a failure to reach agreement between the
unions and University in negotiations to renew the
University of Otago academic and general staff collective
employment agreements.
The unions are claiming a 4%
salary increase, backdated to 1 February. In response, the
University is offering a 3% salary increase, from 1 May, to
general staff and academic staff below the rank of lecturer,
and a restructuring of the salary scales for lecturer and
above. This would result in salary increases of between 3.5%
and 4.8%, and remove some steps from the salary scales.
Association of University Staff (AUS) Otago Branch
President, Dr Shef Rogers, said that the unresolved issues
centred on differential pay offers, backdating, and the
overall level of the pay increase offered. Dr Rogers said
the attitudes of the parties had hardened after the
Vice-Chancellor, Dr Graeme Fogelberg, emailed staff directly
outlining the offer and implying that the unions had not
accurately reported it. He said that a number of staff
believed that the Vice-Chancellor’s action was unnecessarily
provocative in the current industrial climate.
In an
email to staff yesterday, the University’s Manager of
Employee Relations, Lynne Tana, advised that the University
would be deducting pay for all staff absent from work due to
participating in strike action. “Without confirmation from
your Head of Department, that you either worked or were on
approved leave, your pay will be deducted for the duration
of the strike”, the email read. “If you participate in the
strike this email constitutes a suspension as required by
Section 87 of the Employment Relations Act 2004.”
AUS
lawyer Peter Cranney said today that the notices issued by
the University were void, having been issued before strike
action began. He said that employees could only be suspended
once they were on strike.
The University has advised the
unions it considers bargaining is at an end; however the
unions have suggested further discussions or mediation in an
attempt to resolve the dispute.
Meanwhile, negotiations
will resume at Victoria University of Wellington this
afternoon after general (non-academic) staff took strike
action on Monday this week in support of a claim to increase
salaries by 4%. More than 200 staff braved cold weather to
picket the University on Monday to protest at the offer made
by VUW to increase salaries by 2.2%.
Also in Tertiary
Update this week . . . .
1. New Auckland Vice-Chancellor
appointed
2. PBRF costs higher than
rewards
3. Universities starved in
Budget
4. International students angry at fees
rise
5. “Plagiarist” to sue University
New Auckland
Vice-Chancellor appointed
The University of Auckland
announced the appointment of Professor Stuart McCutcheon as
its new Vice-Chancellor on Tuesday this week. Professor
McCutcheon, who is currently Vice-Chancellor of Victoria
University of Wellington, will take up his new position on 1
January 2005. He will succeed Dr John Hood who leaves at the
end of this month to become Vice-Chancellor at Oxford
University.
Auckland’s current Deputy Vice-Chancellor
(Academic), Raewyn Dalziel, will serve as the Acting
Vice-Chancellor during the six month period between Dr
Hood’s departure and the time when Professor McCutcheon
takes up his new position.
The appointment process for a
new vice-chancellor for the University of Auckland has been
one of the most secretive undertaken by a New Zealand
university. AUS Auckland Branch President, Associate
Professor Peter Wills, said it had been unacceptably
secretive and the University Council had only allowed the
involvement of a small group of staff after its initial
process had failed to find any suitable candidate for the
position. It then restricted staff participation to those on
Council and a few others who were only identified after the
event.
PBRF costs higher than rewards
Cost estimates
released by seven universities have shown that they each
spent between $116,000 and $1.63 million to participate in
the recent Performance-Based Research Fund (PBRF) exercise.
According to a report in The Christchurch Press, most say
they will have spent more on taking part in the exercise
than they will gain in funding increases in 2004.
The
Press says that the costs reported did not include the true
cost of participating in the exercise as they did not
include the thousands of hours put in by academic staff
compiling portfolios and research data.
Lincoln
University has estimated its PBRF compliance cost at
$243,000 but says it will only receive an additional
$242,000 in funding this year. Likewise, the University of
Canterbury said that recorded PBRF compliance had cost it
$440,000, double the amount budgeted for, but received a net
increase in funding of $381,000 this year. The compliance
figure did not include an estimated 17,500 hours of academic
staff members’ time spent on the process.
The University
of Auckland, which was ranked first in the PBRF exercise,
said that while PBRF compliance had cost around $400,000,
not including staff time, it only received an additional
$1.6 million funding in 2004.
The universities received
net increases in funding through the PBRF exercise of
between $202,000 at Victoria, and $1.8 million at
Otago.
Associate Minister of Education (Tertiary), Steve
Maharey, has advised that later in the year he will announce
further funding related to the results of the first PBRF
assessment. This is expected to be an injection of new
funding, although details are not known at this
stage.
Universities starved in Budget
Universities will
receive a funding increase of 3.2% per student in 2005, only
0.9% more than the inflation rate, and nothing additional
for research as a result of last week’s Budget. It is the
lowest overall funding increase across the whole of the
education sector, and less than delivered in last year’s
Budget.
AUS National President, Dr Bill Rosenberg, said
that Government now controlled more that 60% of university
income, but continued to starve the sector of desperately
needed additional funding. “As a result of this Budget,
government funding per student in 2005 will still be
substantially less, in actual terms, than it was fifteen
years ago. For example, an arts degree attracted government
funding of $7,505 per student in 1991, but will attract only
$6,049 per student in 2005,” he said.
Dr Rosenberg said
that recent research, commissioned by the AUS and the New
Zealand Vice-Chancellors' Committee, revealed that
government funding of universities had fallen in real terms
by 23% over the last decade.
“Last week’s Budget does
nothing to alleviate the funding crisis which has become
apparent in the university sector,” said Dr Rosenberg.
“Spending on tertiary funding in New Zealand remains lower
than the OECD average, and universities have fared worst
within the sector.”
Dr Rosenberg said that the failure
to substantially increase research funding was particularly
disappointing. “After the efforts to establish the
Performance-Based Research Fund, we had expected the
Government to show that it had a real commitment to the
future of research. Clearly it has not,” he said.
“This
Budget undermines the long-term quality of university
education and inhibits the enhancement of an economy and
society based on increased knowledge,” said Dr Rosenberg.
An Innovation Conference for tertiary education
institutions, also announced in the Budget, would do nothing
to address the basic funding of salaries, staffing levels,
and infrastructure according to Dr Rosenberg. “It is nothing
but an effort to draw attention from the fundamental issues
facing the sector,” he said.
Dr Rosenberg said it was
time the Government differentiated its policy on
universities and funded them in a manner which enabled them
to meet their specific role as it has begun to do for
community childcare centres and public polytechnics in the
Budget.
More detail on tertiary education spending in
the Budget can be found at
http://www.aus.ac.nz/0815%20-%20tertiary%20education%20-%20the%20new%20zealand%20budget.htm
International
students angry at fees rise
International students have
reacted angrily to reports that the University of Waikato is
planning to increase tuition fees for international students
in 2005. A proposed fees increase has been discussed by the
University’s Finance Committee, but will remain confidential
until the Council meets next week.
Waikato University
Student Union President Sandy Pushpamangalam said that while
they did not want to see another fees increase for
international students, it seemed inevitable. “International
students at Waikato University cannot afford to face a
further fee increase and consider that the University is
betraying them by increasing student fees again in 2004,”
she said.
“A graduate student enrolled in 2001 for four
years is currently affected by an increase of more than 50
percent due to fees increase, inflation, and other factors,”
said Ms Pushpamangalam. “International students are left to
suffer as they are not eligible to apply for any assistance
in New Zealand. In many cases, they cannot apply for extra
money once the loan is approved. Further, they are not
eligible to work more than 15 hours due to immigration
regulations.”
“The University management has a
stereotypical view of international students as rich kids
with flash cars. It is simply not true. The reality is that
most of them pay for their studies using a student loan or
by mortgaging the properties in their home country,” said
Pushpamangalam.
Students are running a nationwide
campaign for grand-parenting of international student fees
meaning that a student who enrols in a course can calculate
how much they will end up paying by the end of their
studies.
International students will be protesting
against the fees increase on this Friday to call for no
increase and to introduce fees
grand-parenting.
Worldwatch
“Plagiarist” to sue
University
A student who admits down-loading material
from the internet for his degree plans to sue his University
for negligence. Michael Gunn claims the University of Kent
should have warned him his actions were against the
regulations.
The Times Higher Education Supplement
reports that Gunn was told on the eve of his final exams
that he would get no marks for his course work.
Michael
Gunn, a 21-year-old English student, told the Times Higher
that he did plagiarise, but never dreamt it was a problem.
“I can see there is evidence I have gone against the rules,
but they have taken all my money for three years and pulled
me up the day before I finished,” he said. “If they had
pulled me up with my first essay at the beginning and warned
me of the problems and consequences, it would be fair
enough. But all my essays were handed back with good marks
and no one spotted it.”
David Nightingale, the Deputy
Vice-Chancellor of Kent University said he would not comment
on individual cases because the external examiners’ meeting
for the School of English would take place next week, when
exam entries would be considered. “I would stress that
throughout their time at Kent, all students are given clear
guidelines, as well as practical advice and support, as to
what constitutes plagiarism,” he said. “These spell it out
that it is not acceptable under any
circumstances.”
********************************************************************************
AUS
Tertiary Update is compiled weekly on Thursdays and
distributed freely to members of the union and others. Back
issues are archived on the AUS website:
http://www.aus.ac.nz. Direct enquires to Marty Braithwaite,
AUS Communications Officer, email:
marty.braithwaite@aus.ac.nz