AUS Tertiary Update
Chancellor stymies discussion on salary
funding
University of Canterbury Chancellor, Dr Robin
Mann, yesterday closed down discussion on the funding of
university salaries at that University’s Council meeting,
saying that employment matters were the preserve of the
Vice-Chancellor, and he could not put the University Council
at risk of breaching good faith. He was responding to a
request from a Council member, Associate Professor Maureen
Montgomery, to discuss a letter from the Association of
University Staff (AUS) asking Council members to consider,
at a governance level, salary-funding issues facing the
sector.
Following the recent breakdown in collective
employment agreement negotiation between vice-chancellors
and university unions, AUS National President, Professor
Nigel Haworth, wrote to university council members, inviting
discussion and outlining moves made by AUS to have salary
issues addressed, including the establishment of a
high-level tripartite University Salaries Group. Arguing
that sustainable salaries are the key to quality in the
sector, Professor Haworth said the issue was now one of
governance, and that more progress would be made towards
resolution through cooperation between universities than by
each university acting individually.
As well as refusing
to consider the letter from the AUS, Dr Mann also stopped
any discussion of the comparative merits of competitive and
collaborative models in the sector, something, he asserted,
which would inevitably drift into management areas. When
asked to provide a view on the difference between management
and governance, the Chancellor said he was not prepared to
have that discussed during open meeting.
Several other
Council members said that the matters raised by AUS could be
discussed at governance level without getting into the
detail of current negotiations or encroaching on management
areas. In each case, the Chancellor refused to allow
discussion. The only exception was his invitation to the
Vice-Chancellor to report on the recent employment agreement
negotiations.
AUS Canterbury Branch President, Dr David
Small, said the Chancellor’s apparent inability to
distinguish between governance and management raised
questions about his ability to provide leadership,
particularly at a time when universities face crises on both
the funding and salaries fronts. “The fifty or so staff
present at yesterday’s Council meeting witnessed a
Chancellor who clearly fails to understand that the
University’s Charter, which commits the University to
collaboration, is a matter of governance,” he said. “He also
denied Council the opportunity to discuss meeting with AUS
officials to consider constructive, high-level solutions to
the pressing issues facing the sector.”
Also in Tertiary
Update this week
1. Universities attempt to prohibit AUS
communicating with councils
2. Summit demands an end to
student debt
3. Victoria Council supports salary funding
initiatives
4. Wananga supporters to march on
Parliament
5. Market forces to determine science
courses
6. Australian funding slides
7. Teaching-only
numbers increase
Universities attempt to prohibit
AUS communicating with councils
Auckland and Massey
Universities have told the AUS that it is neither to write
to, nor meet with their respective Council members to
discuss salary funding issues, asserting that such
communication is in breach of the Employment Relations Act.
This follows their receipt of the letter from AUS National
President, Professor Nigel Haworth, described in the story
above, containing his offer to meet with councils to discuss
the issues facing the sector at a governance
level.
Victoria University Chancellor Tim Beaglehole also
wrote to AUS, saying that it is not appropriate for the
Council to be involved, and not its role to engage with the
unions on any aspect of bargaining. A University of Otago
representative has complained, not to AUS but to another
union.
University of Auckland Human Resources Director,
Kath Clarke, contends that the letter fails to recognise the
role and authority of the University’s representatives at
the negotiation, attempts to undermine that authority and
also undermines the bargaining. She then instructed AUS not
to contact Council members.
In a similar letter Peter
Chemiss, a partner in the law firm Buddle Findlay acting for
Massey University, claimed there could be little doubt that
writing to Council members in “this vein” is in breach of
the Employment Relations Act. He sought an assurance from
AUS that it would desist from writing such letters to
Council members, or meeting with them to discuss bargaining.
AUS General Secretary Helen Kelly has responded to
Auckland management, saying that it is the union’s right to
communicate with the Council, and that the Employment
Relations Act actually protects its right to communicate
reasonably-held opinion. “Your attempt to prevent
[communications with] the Council will not be complied
with,” she wrote.
In a letter to Massey University
Council members, Helen Kelly said she was surprised to have
received its complaint, and wanted to emphasis that
Professor Haworth’s letter was a genuine attempt to discuss
the governance issues around the future direction of the
sector, and to engage constructively with councils in an
effort to try and improve quality and funding.
The
letters are all available on the AUS website:
www.aus.ac.nz
Summit demands an end to student
debt
Student representatives from across the country will
gather in Auckland tomorrow for a three-day summit calling
for an end to student debt. It is the first such summit
since the last General Election, and will plan the students’
election campaign, aimed at ensuring that the tackling of
student debt is a key election issue.
Included amongst
the summit events will be a panel of representatives from
seven political parties addressing the question of solving
the country’s $7 billion student-debt problem. The Minister
of Education, Trevor Mallard, will speak on Sunday
afternoon.
New Zealand University Students’ Association
Co-President, Camilla Belich, said that the current
Government had done little to ease the student-debt crisis
during the past six years, and neither of the main political
parties had outlined what they would do to tackle the
crisis. “We are sick of being ignored,” she said. “Students
know the answer to the $7 billion student-debt crisis, what
we are looking for is political parties who are willing to
listen.”
Greg Langton, President of the Auckland
University Students’ Association, said that high fees and
the lack of student allowances are the main drivers of
student debt, and the fact that representatives of all of
the major political parties are fronting up to the summit
proves that student debt would be a key issue for this
election.
Victoria Council supports salary funding
initiatives
Despite its refusal to meet with AUS
representatives, the Victoria University Council this week
passed three resolutions supporting initiatives relating to
funding and salaries. The package of measures includes
taking a concerted approach to obtaining increased funding
from government, active participation in tripartite talks
between the unions, vice-chancellors and the Government and
for the Vice-Chancellor to monitor the progress of the
University Salaries Group (USG), recently announced by the
Minister of Education.
Meanwhile, the New Zealand
Vice-Chancellors’ Committee (NZVCC) has reiterated that it
wants the USG to look at overall funding issues, and not
just salaries. In a newsletter this week, NZVCC Chair and
Auckland Vice-Chancellor, Stuart McCutcheon, said that the
issue is wider than just salaries. “Additional public
resourcing is also required to improve teaching and research
quality, research infrastructure and student facilities,” he
said.
AUS National President Professor Nigel Haworth said
he saw the attempt to broaden the terms of reference of the
USG to deal with wider funding issues, as an attempt by
vice-chancellors to continue with the practice of putting
salaries at the bottom of their spending priorities.
“Vice-chancellors have ignored the salary problems in the
sector for years; it shows they are prepared to compromise
quality and the long-term viability of the sector,” he said.
Professor Haworth said that the future of universities
could not be left to seven vice-chancellors who, to date,
had shown little regard for the sector as a whole, and who
had failed to capitalise on the opportunities that national
bargaining could create. “Paying competitive salaries, and
ensuring the recruitment and retention of high-quality
staff, is the most serious problem facing the sector. We
will not allow the vice-chancellors to squander this
opportunity by diverting the purpose of the USG,” he
said.
The USG will hold its inaugural meeting on 14 July
to determine its membership and terms of
reference.
Wananga supporters to march on
Parliament
More than 4,000 staff, students and others are
expected to march on Parliament to show their support for Te
Wananga o Aotearoa, their arrival timed to coincide with the
release of the decision by the Minister of Education, Trevor
Mallard, on whether to dissolve the institution’s Council
and replace it with a commissioner.
The Waikato Times has
reported that an organising group of staff, students, iwi
representatives and residents met this week to plan the
march, as Maori support for the institution increased. Other
meetings are planned to consider other actions to support
the retention of the Wananga’s Council and management.
A
spokesperson, Hira George, is reported as saying that she
could not believe the Government’s actions, and that Maori
had worked hard for twenty years to establish the Wananga.
The Maori Party has also offered its support and, last
weekend, about eighty Maori leaders and kaumatua met at the
Wananga to offer support to its Chief Executive, Rongo
Wetere.
Dr Wetere said he had good reason to suggest
that Mr Mallard’s reasoning in appointing a commissioner is
contestable, and that there is good reason for the Council
to remain. “We must decide what is best for our students and
the protection of our educational delivery. I don’t believe
we would be having such huge pressure if we weren’t
successful in what we do. It’s a political issue. Mallard
just wants to take control of our destiny, that’s what it’s
all about,” he said.
Worldwatch
Market forces to
determine science courses
The Higher Education Funding
Council for England (Hefce) has ruled out government
intervention or subsidies to guarantee the survival of
vulnerable courses, despite the closure of a number of
university science courses. Insisting that courses should be
subject to market forces, Hefce has dismissed concerns over
the closure of physics and chemistry courses as “moral
panic”, and praised new cross-curricular courses such as
forensic sciences. Almost a third of university departments
offering physics have closed in the past decade.
Hefce
was ordered, last year, to investigate a potential crisis in
subjects considered to be of strategic national importance.
In its report released yesterday, entitled Strategically
Important and Vulnerable Subjects, Hefce concludes that
there is no general crisis and warns that intervention would
be counter-productive.
Australian funding slides
Public
funding to Australian universities has fallen in real terms
since the election of the Howard Government, according to
analysis released by the Australian Vice-Chancellors’
Committee (AVCC). At the same time, student fees have
increased from $A1500 per year in 1989 to $A3894 in 2000.
Student-to-staff ratios have increased by a third, from 14
to 1 to 22 to 1. The AVCC figures show that core funding per
student place has fallen from $A7,635 in 2000 to $A7,340 in
2003.
The analysis was released after the Education
Minister, Brendan Nelson, said that he did not accept that
per-student funding had reduced. The AVCC Chief Executive
said that while total revenues received by universities had
increased, so too had the number of students.
Meanwhile,
the University of Newcastle has announced it is to deal with
budget problems by abolishing 450 full-time staff positions,
one-fifth of its staff. A public campaign, launched by the
National Tertiary Education Union, cites chronic
under-funding from the Federal Government as the principal
cause of the University’s financial
troubles.
Teaching-only numbers increase
One in five
academics in the United Kingdom are employed on
teaching-only contracts, according to new research released
by the Association of University Teachers (AUT). A report,
The Rise of Teaching-only Academics, highlights what it
describes as the creeping levels of casualisation in higher
education. Among its key findings are that only 55 percent
of the UK’s 148,275 academics are employed to both teach and
conduct research; 42,000 academics are employed on a
part-time basis; 45 percent of academics are employed on
short-term contracts, with two-thirds of those on
teaching-only contracts; and 11,500 academics are employed
for term-time only.
The AUT report is based on data from
the Higher Education Statistics Agency which, for the first
time, includes academics who work for less than 25 percent
of a full-time contract.
In 2003-04, 29,000 academics
were employed on teaching-only contracts compared with
15,000 from the previous year, with the number of part-time,
teaching-only staff increased from 8,650 to 22,530. At the
same time, the number of academics engaged on joint teaching
and research contracts fell from 85,000 to 81,000.
AUT
Assistant General Secretary Paul Cottrell blamed the rise in
casualisation on universities preparing for the next
Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) round in 2008. “In a
desperate attempt to boost their research ratings, many
universities are known to be shifting academic staff onto
teaching-only contracts to avoid them being counted in the
RAE,” he said. “We have widespread reports from our members
that universities are enticing big-name academics with the
promise that they will not have to teach, while other
academics are being pushed onto teaching-only
contracts.”
The AUT report can be found at:
http://www.aut.org.uk/media/pdf/c/3/teachingonly_jun06.pdf
Additional
informational from The
Guardian
********************************************************************************
AUS
Tertiary Update is compiled weekly on Thursdays and
distributed freely to members of the Association of
University Staff and others. Back issues are available on
the AUS website: www.aus.ac.nz . Direct enquires should be
made to Marty Braithwaite, AUS Communications Officer,
email:
marty.braithwaite@aus.ac.nz