AUS Tertiary Update
Rod Donald farewelled
Representatives of the Association
of University Staff (AUS) have today joined other mourners
in Christchurch to farewell a friend in Green Party
Co-Leader Rod Donald, who died at the weekend.
AUS
General Secretary Helen Kelly, who is overseas and unable to
attend today’s funeral, said that Mr Donald was a principled
leader of a political party which has always supported trade
unions and working people. She said that Mr Donald had long
promoted policies which were consistent with those of the
AUS, and had been a strong advocate for a well-resourced and
high-quality university system.
“Mr Donald has had a long
personal association with the AUS, and a number of staff and
members, in some cases well preceding his Parliamentary
career, and his contribution and support have been greatly
appreciated,” said Ms Kelly. “Union members were both
shocked and saddened to hear of Mr Donald’s death.”
New
Zealand Council of Trade Unions’ President, Ross Wilson,
described Mr Donald as a passionate and tireless advocate
for sustainable development and social justice. “Rod was a
key influence in bringing the Green Party and the union
movement closer together, and we have worked very closely on
many issues over the past four years,” Mr Wilson said.
Ms Kelly said that Mr Donald had displayed remarkable
political maturity, most recently being instrumental in
allowing the formation of the new Government.
She passed
on the Association’s condolences to Mr Donald’s family and
to the Green Party.
Also in Tertiary Update this
week
1. Cullen sends clear message about future shape of
sector
2. Student-loan legislation tabled in
Parliament
3. Friends of Private Education Exports
lobby
4. Otago fees increase by up to 5
percent
5. Polytechnics receive QRP
funding
6. Tertiary-sector advertising up
7. University staff oppose Australian reforms
8. US
to cut higher-education funding
9. UK universities fear
research and lectures may be illegal
Cullen sends clear
message about future shape of sector
In his first public
engagement since appointment as Minister for Tertiary
Education, Dr Michael Cullen has delivered a clear message
to the sector, saying that the high-growth strategies of the
past decade and the kind of branding exercises seen in some
institutions won’t cut much ice with the Government. Nor
will spending money promising a cracking good social life to
students.
Dr Cullen said that, alongside a lot of very
good tertiary education outcomes, the 1990s spawned some
decidedly average ones, and some that involved “quite
frankly” the pursuit of “cash cow” opportunities and an
atmosphere that encouraged high-growth strategies for their
own sake.
In a speech to the Institutes of Technology and
Polytechnics of New Zealand Conference, Dr Cullen said that
the intention of the Government is not only to provide a
better sense of direction for the sector, but also to be
pragmatic about what can be achieved and in what timeframe,
and to leave ample room for innovation and leadership to
flourish.
“Our conviction as a government,” said Dr
Cullen, “is that we can and must create a tertiary sector
that, without exception, provides education that is high
quality in terms of international benchmarks and the
expectations of learners and employers, and highly relevant
to the skills needed to face the economic and social
challenges that New Zealand faces.”
Included among the
initiatives introduced by the Government to provide the
sector with more direction are the reviews and assessments
of strategic relevance; the review of the rapid growth in
expenditure on certificate, diploma and adult community
education courses; the Quality Reinvestment Programme, with
grants worth $177 million over five years to develop and
sustaining high-quality and relevant provision in institutes
of technology, polytechnics and wânanga; and a review of the
central education-sector agencies.
“Make no mistake:
this is about major change. Many institutions will look very
different in five years’ time,” said Dr Cullen.
Student-loan legislation tabled in Parliament
The
Minister of Tertiary Education, Dr Michael Cullen, tabled
legislation in Parliament on Tuesday which will make student
loans interest-free, from the start of the new financial
year, for students and former students residing in New
Zealand. The Bill will be fast-tracked through all stage of
the House to ensure that the changes can take effect from 1
April 2006.
Dr Cullen said that the interest-free
student-loan policy, which was a key part of Labour’s
election manifesto, would apply to existing and new loans,
and had been designed both to cut the cost to students of
tertiary study and to encourage skilled New Zealanders to
invest their skills in the New Zealand economy.
“As a
further inducement to encourage people back [to New
Zealand], non-resident borrowers who are in default for
non-repayment of their loans will have their penalties
cancelled under a special amnesty if, between 1 April next
year and 31 March 2007, if they agree to keep their current
liability up to date for two years,” Dr Cullen
said.
Estimates are that the interest-free regime will
reduce the value of the student loans portfolio held by the
Crown by around $1.5 billion. There will be a further impact
of around $500 million due to a shift in accounting
treatment from book to fair value. Both changes are
one-off.
In response to Dr Cullen’s announcement,
National Party Education spokesman, Bill English, says
Labour's student-loan scheme will result in increased
student debt and lower quality education. Mr English says
the policy encourages more students to borrow more money and
pay it back more slowly.
“Currently just 55 percent of
students eligible for a loan take one out. But now the more
than 100,000 students who are eligible for a loan but
haven’t yet taken one out have a strong incentive to take
out a full student loan and put it in the bank to earn a
nice little nest egg on the taxpayer,” he said. “Even if
only half of those students take up the opportunity, the
total student debt burden will grow by an additional $2
billion over the next three years.”
Friends of Private
Education Exports lobby
In a move that appears at odds
with other government policy, trade officials have informed
the AUS that New Zealand is starting a “Friends of Private
Education Exports” group of WTO members to push for more
private-sector involvement in education in the current
General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) negotiations
at the World Trade Organisation.
This group would seek
commitments on private education from WTO members that
constitute priority education markets. In line with the
activity of other WTO groupings pushing for commercial
access in other service sectors, it is expected that the
group would seek to set targets for commitments in the
private education sector, supplemented by a model schedule
for an offer in this sector. Officials say that any model
schedule would “suggest options to accommodate members’
differing domestic environments and levels of
ambition”.
They say that the group will not be used to
advocate commitments on public education.
AUS National
President, Professor Nigel Haworth said that there is an
inherent contradiction in the Government supporting an
international lobby for private education at a time when it
has openly acknowledged that domestic private tertiary
education constitutes a problem because of quality issues
and its duplication of public-sector courses.
Professor
Haworth said that a significant risk in establishing such a
group is that it will bring increased pressure for the
opening and the commercialising education in New Zealand,
with the greater likelihood of disputes being brought where
New Zealand is stepping outside GATS constraints on
regulation, such as attempting to limit the number of
universities.
According to Professor Haworth, these
problems are compounded by such issues as officials having
no set definition of private education, other than a general
view that it is where individuals, rather than public
authorities, are paying tuition fees.
The AUS is writing
to the Prime Minister asking the Government to abandon its
support for the Friends of Private Education Exports
initiative. It is also raising concerns about apparent New
Zealand support for intensification of commitments in the
GATS negotiations which would threaten New Zealand’s public
services.
Otago fees increase by up to 5 percent
The
University of Otago will raise most student tuition fees for
2006 by 5 percent, the maximum permitted under the
Government’s fee-maxima regulations, but says its overall
income will probably fall next year.
Chancellor Lindsay
Brown said that, despite the increases, the University would
still have some of the lowest domestic student tuition fees
in the country, especially for Arts and Business courses. He
noted that tuition fees for some undergraduate papers, such
as Physiotherapy, would actually drop in 2006. Domestic fees
for Dentistry would remain unchanged, while those for
Medicine would decrease should the University be unable to
obtain an exemption to allow for the current 2005 fee to
remain unchanged next year.
“Overall, I think this is
good news for Otago students as we remain one of the most
affordable universities in the nation at a time when costs
are escalating beyond the rate of inflation and beyond what
the Government currently budgets for the tertiary sector,”
Mr Brown said.
Mr Brown said it was no surprise that
universities across the country are increasing their fees
and, in some cases, seeking approval for larger hikes. “This
year’s Government budget set a 2.6 percent increase for the
2006 tuition subsidy. However, inflation was now expected to
be 3.4 percent,” he explained.
The AUS Otago Branch
President, Shane Montague-Gallagher, said it appears that
the University is in a no-win situation with fee increases.
“With rising costs exceeding the increase in government
funding, it seems the University Council had little choice
in this instance,” he said. “We hope the Universities
Tripartite Forum, established as a result of the recent
industrial unrest on most university campuses, and which
involves unions, vice-chancellors and government
representatives, will come up with some real solutions that
will serve the sector long-term.”
Polytechnics receive QRP
funding
Polytechnics and wânanga have received more than
$4 million from the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) in
funding designed to help them plan for changes in the
tertiary-education sector. Nineteen out of twenty-three
eligible polytechnics and wânanga have each received
$250,000 under the Government’s new Quality Reinvestment
Programme.
The QRP is a five-year project at the
forefront of changes being put in place by the TEC under the
umbrella of the Certificate and Diploma Programme to support
providers to align their certificate and diploma courses
with the 2005-07 Statement of Tertiary Education Priorities
(STEP), and to build up a network of high-quality, relevant
provision that meets the needs of learners, employers, their
communities and New Zealand as a whole.
To qualify,
institutions have signed a resolution agreeing to support
the Programme’s aims of developing a network of
high-quality, relevant and value-for-money certificate and
diploma provision in the next five years.
A number of
polytechnics are working towards applying for the
Programme’s second stage $750,000 payment. To receive this
they must show the TEC that factors beyond their control,
such as competition and the geographic size and population
of their catchment area, are making it difficult for them to
maintain high-quality, relevant provision.
TEC Liaison
and Development Group Manager Max Kerr said the Government
has allocated $200m over five years for this programme.
“That’s a long-term investment,” he said. “It’s clear the
government is looking for substantial change.”
Tertiary-sector advertising up
New figures provided to
the New Zealand University Students’ Association (NZUSA) by
AC Neilson show that tertiary institutions have increased
spending on advertising and mass marketing by 103 percent
since 1999, and now spend over $122 million competing with
each other.
NZUSA Co-President, Camilla Belich, said
the figures show that the Government’s call for less
competition and more collaboration within the tertiary
sector has clearly been laughed at by vice-chancellors and
chief executives’ who have responded by spending more than
doubling spending on marketing since 1999. “There is no
academic proof that mass-marketing campaigns even work and,
according to the 2004 TNS Income and Expenditure Survey,
only 6 percent of students used marketing as their primary
reason for choosing which tertiary institution to study at,”
said Ms Belich.
Ms Belich said that students would be
pleased at the concern shown by the new Minister of
Education at the huge expenditure on advertising by tertiary
institutions. “He now must act to prevent even more public
and student money being wasted on fruitless marketing
campaigns,” said Ms Belich.
Worldwatch
University staff
oppose Australian reforms
Australian academics have
predicted individual employment contracts will “destroy the
collegiality” of the country’s universities and prompt an
exodus of staff as conditions of employment are undermined.
University professors from across Australia have signed a
statement, released on Tuesday this week, opposing the
Federal Government’s workplace relations changes for higher
education as a threat to university independence that will
undermine academic freedom and do nothing to help improve
the quality of teaching and research.
Legislation
scheduled to be debated in the Australian Senate this week
will see universities denied nearly $300 million of funding
in 2006 and 2007 unless they adopt the hardline
workplace-relations conditions, known as the Higher
Education Workplace Relations Requirements.
Part of the
Government’s broader Workchoices package, these conditions
include requiring Australian Workplace (individual)
Agreements to be offered to all university staff, the
removal of limits on fixed-term and casual employment, and
the elimination of any direct union role in collective
bargaining, disputes and grievances.
Dr Carolyn Allport,
President of the National Tertiary Education Union, said
this week that the quality and integrity of teaching and
research depends not only on the ability of universities to
appoint staff and set conditions without external
interference, but on staff having the right to speak out and
offer comment ‘without fear or favour’. “Forcing
universities to employ staff on secret individual contracts
undermines this right, which is essential if universities
are to meet the needs of our community for expert advice and
independent research,” she said. “Although the Federal
Government currently provides only 40 per cent of university
funding, it wants a hundred per cent control of university
staffing, management and employment practices.”
University staff will join a coalition of union and
community groups to rally across Australia on Tuesday next
week, with marches being held in all capitals and large
cities. Marches in support of the Australians will also be
held in New Zealand.
US to cut higher-education
funding
The United States House of Representatives is
scheduled to vote tomorrow on a budget-reconciliation
resolution that contains potentially devastating cuts for
higher-education programmes, according to higher education
unions. The Senate has already cut student-aid programs to
provide for hurricane relief efforts, but it is considering
even deeper cuts to an already inadequate student aid
programme. The proposed Bill reduces student loan programmes
by $US14.5 billion to pay for deficit reduction, disaster
relief and tax cuts.
A background paper from the
American Association of University Professors says the Bill
includes several concerning provisions, including more
expensive student loans, intrusions on academic freedom and
institutional autonomy and fewer checks on fraud and abuse
in the for-profit sector.
UK universities fear research
and lectures may be illegal
Academics and university
librarians could fall foul of the UK Government’s new terror
legislation unless they curb debate in tutorials and
restrict the range of research materials available to
students, vice-chancellors have warned. Universities UK
(UUK) and the Association of University Teachers (AUT) said
the day-to-day work of thousands of academic staff may be
criminalised if the new laws, being debated in the Commons
this week, are passed.
Professor Drummond Bone, UUK
President, said that the Bill was drafted in such a way that
it might well get in the way of normal academic work. “It
might provoke the kind of suspicion and intolerance we are
trying to deal with,” he said.
Vivienne Stern, Public
Affairs adviser to UUK, said that the Bill is unacceptably
wide and will, in the view of UUK, expose academic staff and
librarians and, by virtue of that, the university management
to the risk of committing criminal offences during their
standard work.
Last night (New Zealand time), the most
controversial part of the Bill, giving police 90-day
detention powers over suspected terrorists, was defeated
after many of Tony Blair’s Labour Party colleagues voted
against their Prime Minister.
From Education
Guardian