AUS Tertiary Update
Lecturer awarded interim reinstatement
The University of
Auckland has been ordered to reinstate on an interim basis a
lecturer in its School of Music until the Employment
Relations Authority has had the opportunity to hear a
complaint that the staff member was unjustifiably dismissed
at the end of a series of fixed-term employment agreements.
The case, taken by the Association of University Staff
(AUS), alleges unjustified dismissal, breach of an
employment agreement and a breach of good faith.
The
lecturer, Glenda Keam, had been employed at the University
on the fixed-term employment agreements between 1996 and the
end of 2005, the reason given for the last such agreement
was to trial a new course. Ms Keam said there was no new
course of study to trial, and it had been stated over the
years that the real reason for the fixed-term agreements was
that the University did not have enough money to fund a
permanent lecturer position. When the University did find
the money for a permanent position, however, Ms Keam was not
appointed.
AUS lawyer, Peter Cranney, told the Employment
Relations Authority that, not only did the University not
have a genuine reason for using fixed-term agreements, it
also failed to comply with other obligations derived from
the Employment Relations Act by failing to state in writing
in her employment agreement the way in which Ms Keam’s
employment would come to an end and the reasons for it
ending in that way. Mr Cranney submitted that the
consequence of these breaches of the Act was that Ms Keam
was entitled to have her employment deemed to be of
indefinite duration.
Acting for the University, Phillipa
Muir from the major law firm of Simpson Grierson, argued
that the requirements of the State Sector Act to the effect
that, where practical, vacant positions must be advertised
and the most suitable candidate appointed, meant that Ms
Keam’s position could not be changed from fixed-term to
permanent.
In its determination released yesterday, the
Employment Relations Authority said that a key issue to be
considered would be the relationship between the Employment
Relations and State Sector Acts. In the meantime, it
determined that the balance of convenience and the overall
justice of the application favoured Ms Keam, and ordered
that she should be reinstated.
The substantive case is
due to be heard in May.
Also in Tertiary Update this
week
1. Mystery surrounds future of Massey VC
2. New
era for student loans
3. Interest-free student loans for
overseas charity workers
4. Graduates head
overseas
5. More students coming to tertiary education
later in life
6. Global summit for Commonwealth
university leaders
7. RAE to be scrapped
8. Chemistry
plans criticised
9. “Derisory” university pay offer
rejected
Mystery surrounds future of Massey VC
Massey
University is mired in a standoff between its
Vice-Chancellor and Council, according to a major story in
its student newspaper, Chaff, this week. It reports rumours
of a crisis so serious that the Council is thought to be
considering a vote of no confidence in the Vice-Chancellor,
Professor Judith Kinnear, at its next meeting in April.
A
letter obtained by Chaff reveals that Professor Kinnear was
subject to a performance review last year in which it was
determined that she had lost the confidence of senior
management staff as well as senior academic staff.
The
letter, which was sent to Massey’s Chancellor, Nigel Gould,
and Council members by eight professors in the School of
Fundamental Sciences, supports Professor Kinnear, saying
that the signatories have found no evidence that she has
failed in her duties, adding that she has been subject to
victimisation and harassment.
Chaff reporter Matthew
Russell says that, in their letter, the signatories state
their dissatisfaction with the Chancellor’s treatment of the
Vice-Chancellor, and provide details of what they believe to
be flaws regarding Professor Kinnear’s performance review.
“We strongly believe that [Mr Gould’s] actions have the
potential to inflict damaging publicity on Massey University
about shortcomings in its employment practices, and
simultaneously seriously undermine staff morale,” the letter
reads.
Although there has not been a formal decision
made to end Professor Kinnear’s tenure as Vice-Chancellor,
the letter indicates that negotiations regarding terms for
the termination of her employment contract are on-going.
“The fact that [Professor Kinnear] has been assigned a QC by
the University to negotiate an exit package, but not to
present her point of view, indicates to us that undue
pressure has been exerted on the Vice-Chancellor, and that
this borders on harassment,” the letter reads.
Professor
David Parry, a spokesperson for the signatories to the
letter, said the decision to write to Council members came
after a meeting with the Chancellor to discuss their
concerns proved to be “very disappointing”.
Most other
parties involved could not be reached, or declined to
comment on the record.
New era for student loans
From
this Saturday, no further interest will be charged on
student loans for those who live in New Zealand. Under the
new policy, announced by the Government last year, students
who borrow from 1 April will only have to repay what they
borrow. Those with existing loans will not be charged any
further interest.
The Minister for Tertiary Education, Dr
Michael Cullen, said the change continues the Government’s
progression in making tertiary education more affordable.
“No more will students and graduates be burdened with the
compounding cost of interest provided they remain in New
Zealand. This will save them thousands of dollars in many
cases, and knock years off repayment times,” he
said.
Those with student loans who travel overseas to
work will still have to pay interest. “The change is
designed to encourage them to stay in New Zealand or to
return more quickly to contribute to our economy and
society,'” said Dr Cullen.
Dr Cullen told Parliament on
Tuesday that around about 470,000 New Zealanders will
benefit from the new policy. He said that around 350,000
will get an immediate benefit, and some 120,000 people who
are already studying interest-free under Labour’s 2000
policy will benefit when they finish studying.
Meanwhile,
the architect of the current student-loan scheme, Dr
Lockwood Smith, the National Minister of Education between
1990 and 1996, has admitted that one of the fundamental
planks of his scheme was unfair and regrettable. In an
interview in the Sunday Star-Times, he admitted to being
troubled by the requirement that students be tested for
eligibility for loans on their parents’ income until the age
of twenty-five. “It was the equity, the fairness of it. I
would have preferred, if we couldn’t have made it universal,
then a less severe scheme that hit wage and salary earning
families less hard,” he said.
In something of an unusual
occurrence, the New Zealand University Students’ Association
(NZUSA) has found itself in complete agreement with Dr
Smith. “It’s great that Dr Smith now understands the
absurdity of means-testing students on their parents income
until they turn twenty-five; its just a shame he didn’t do
anything about it while he was in charge,” said Conor
Roberts, NZUSA Co-President. “We call upon Dr. Smith to
immediately introduce a Private Members Bill into the House
in order to rectify this unfair policy.”
Interest-free
student loans for overseas charity workers
Student-loan
borrowers working overseas as volunteers with any of
forty-eight named charitable organisations may be exempted
from paying interest on their student loans while working
for those organisations.
The Minister for Tertiary
Education, Dr Michael Cullen, said that borrowers living
overseas for more than six months will generally not qualify
for the new interest-free student loan-policy which comes
into effect on 1 April. “However, the law gives Inland
Revenue the discretion to grant an exemption for certain
borrowers who are overseas, including post-graduate
students, government employees and people who work for free
or for a token payment for a charitable organisation
operating overseas,” he said. “The regulation signed this
week specifies the forty-eight charitable organisations that
are covered by the exemption.”
“It will still be up to
Inland Revenue to decide if individuals working for those
organisations qualify for the full interest write-off under
the policy,” Dr Cullen said.
The write-off will apply
for a maximum of two years.
Graduates head
overseas
Nearly a quarter of New Zealanders with tertiary
degrees are living overseas in one of the thirty other
member nations of the Organisation of Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), according to a
report released this week. That number is second only to
Ireland, at 25 percent, and well ahead of the next groups of
countries, Austria, Switzerland, the United Kingdom,
Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal and the Slovak Republic, all at
more than 10 percent, and the Czech Republic, Germany and
the Netherlands at close to 9 percent.
The 2006 OECD
Factbook shows, however, that New Zealand is among those
countries with close to zero net-graduate-population
movement, because it gains as many immigrants with tertiary
degrees as it loses. Further research shows that, of those
New Zealanders who leave the country, one half intends to
return, a quarter does not intend to return and a quarter
has not decided.
In terms of educational outcomes, the
Factbook shows that tertiary attainment, as a proportion of
the population of New Zealanders aged between twenty-five
and sixty-four, has increased from 22.9 percent in 1991 to
30.9 percent in 2003.
The 2006 OECD Factbook can be found
at:
http://lysander.sourceoecd.org/vl=3698656/cl=11/nw=1/rpsv/factbook/
More
students coming to tertiary education later in life
Over
the latter part of the 1990s and early 2000s, there has been
an increase in the number of students beginning
tertiary-education studies later in life, according to a new
report just published by the Ministry of Education. The
report, From school, work or unemployment: A comparison of
pathways in tertiary education, shows that the traditional
pathway of entering tertiary education directly from
secondary school has reduced significantly since 1998. Then,
43 percent of first-time domestic students came directly
from secondary school, 32 percent from the workforce and 16
percent were not employed or beneficiaries in the previous
year. By 2004, 26 percent came directly from secondary
school, 53 percent from the workforce and 12 percent were
not employed or beneficiaries in the previous year.
The
report describes the pathways taken by a cohort of 54,400
domestic students who first studied in 1998 at tertiary
education institutions, and follows their interactions with
the tertiary sector in the seven years until the end of
2004.
The report, authored by Scott Usher, can be found
at:
http://www.minedu.govt.nz/index.cfm?layout=document&documentid=11101&data=l
Worldwatch
Global
summit for Commonwealth university leaders
The executive
heads of universities from five continents will meet at the
University of Adelaide next month for a four-day summit
meeting to consider the key questions and challenges facing
higher education in the Commonwealth and globally. Named
University Futures, the summit will seek to place the
universities at the heart of development and change in all
regions of the Commonwealth.
The summit, which has been
organised by the Association of Commonwealth Universities,
the University of Adelaide, the Australian Vice-Chancellors’
Committee and the New Zealand Vice Chancellors’ Committee,
will be attended by some 300 delegates from thirty-five
countries from every part of the Commonwealth.
A key
intention of the four days will be to outline ways in which
Commonwealth universities will work together and with
partners from government, business and society to shape
solutions to many of the world’s most pressing problems. It
will feed directly into the meeting of Commonwealth Heads of
Government in December.
The conference will hear from
university, government and business leaders on such issues
as sustainable development, renewing the African university,
civic engagement, free trade, regional economic development,
social disadvantage, gender as a barrier to opportunity in
university management, HIV/AIDS and the role of university
leadership and the role of the universities in shaping
national strategies for science, technology and innovation.
Former New Zealand Prime Minister and WTO
Director-General Mike Moore and current Minister of
Education, Steve Maharey, will both address the
conference.
RAE to be scrapped
The British Research
Assessment Exercise is to be replaced with a “metrics-based
system for assessing research quality”. That means that the
scheduled 2008 assessment exercise will be the last.
In
his Budget speech last week, Chancellor Gordon Brown said
that, while the Government is strongly committed to the dual
support system (teaching and research) and to rewarding
research excellence, it recognised some of the burdens
imposed by the existing RAE. He said that the Government
wanted to ensure that institutions continue to have the
freedom to set strategic priorities for research, undertake
blue skies research and respond quickly to emerging
priorities and new fields of enquiry.
The Government
will launch a consultation process in May on its preferred
option for a metrics-based system for assessing research
quality and allocating Quality-Related funding.
The
Association of University Teachers has welcomed the
scrapping of the RAE, saying that it had fostered a
short-term, over-selective approach to higher-education
funding which had led to department closures and job losses,
as well as encouraging a culture of game-playing and
discrimination.
Meanwhile, the Australian National
Tertiary Education Union has urged the Government there to
postpone the proposed implementation of a controversial new
Research Quality Framework, similar to the RAE.
Chemistry
plans criticised
Members of the British House of Commons
Science and Technology Committee held an emergency evidence
session on Monday this week to question the Vice-Chancellor
of the University of Sussex, Alasdair Smith, about proposals
to close the University’s Chemistry Department.
The
session heard that Sussex had been subjecting its Chemistry
faculty to “a kind of malign neglect” over recent years,
making no attempt, for example, to find high-calibre
replacements for senior researchers who left or retired.
Plans to close the Department had been kept secret from
all but a select group of senior management because the
Vice-Chancellor feared the decision would be publicly
attacked. It was revealed that he had not told the Head of
Department or funding agencies about the proposal to close
the Department.
After the session, the Chair of the
Common’s Committee, Phil Willis, said that he would make a
report to the Government calling for stronger oversight of
science in universities. He said that the Vice-Chancellor
had revealed that the proposal to close the Department was
ill-thought-out, with no commercial merit and no academic
merit and which clearly needed to go back to the drawing
board.
From The Scientist and Education
Guardian
“Derisory” university pay offer rejected
The
academic unions, AUT and NATFHE, have branded as derisory a
pay offer from university employers in the United Kingdom,
and as showing that they are not serious in attempting to
resolve the current pay dispute. The two unions were
barred from pay talks this week between the Universities and
Colleges Employers’ Association and the non-academic unions
at which a pay offer, to increase salaries by 6 percent over
two years, was made. The unions have claimed 23 percent over
the next three years.
Sally Hunt, AUT General Secretary,
said that making a pay offer without input from the biggest
academic unions was a pointless publicity stunt. “I am
amazed that the employers could possibly think this derisory
offer would satisfy our members,” she said. “This dispute
can only be resolved when there is a serious offer on the
table.”
Roger Kline, Head of the Universities Department
at NATFHE said the pay offer was less than half what
vice-chancellors paid themselves, and is “way short” of what
the union would regard as the basis for a settlement.
“Employers have not yet got the message that our members are
serious about a significant pay increase. We are very
disappointed but remain available for discussions if the
employers wish to make a serious offer,” he said.
********************************************************************************
AUS
Tertiary Update is compiled weekly on Thursdays and
distributed freely to members of the Association of
University Staff and others. Back issues are available on
the AUS website: www.aus.ac.nz . Direct enquires should be
made to Marty Braithwaite, AUS Communications Officer,
email:
marty.braithwaite@aus.ac.nz