AUS Tertiary Update
PBRF should be delayed, say staff
As universities gear up
for this year’s round of the Performance-Based Research Fund
assessment, concerns about the fairness of the scheme have
been unveiled in new research published by the Centre for
Labour and Trade Union Studies at the University of Waikato.
More than one-half of the academic staff surveyed thought
that problems in the PBRF process were sufficient to warrant
delaying the round, and almost two-thirds felt that its
effect on academic staff morale and collegiality had been
negative. Just 10.2 percent believed it had a positive
effect overall.
The 2003 PBRF Experience: A Survey of
Academic Staff at the University of Waikato reveals that the
issue of fairness, or at least the perception of fairness,
was a significant one for staff who participated in the 2003
round, with female participants reporting considerably worse
experiences and perceptions than their male
counterparts.
Association of University Staff (AUS)
Academic Vice-President, Dr Tom Ryan, says that this
survey-based research project represents the most detailed
analysis to date of the views of participants in the PBRF
exercise, and that the responses reflect the views of New
Zealand university academics at large. “These results should
send a clear message to the Tertiary Education Commission
that participants believe the process needs to be improved
if the PBRF is to be considered a credible and fair process
for measuring research performance,” he said.
Dr Ryan,
who along with William Cochrane and Michael Law carried out
the research, said that one of the most decisive concerns to
emerge was the perception that researchers focused on New
Zealand, Maori or Pacific topics were disadvantaged by the
fact that the PBRF system tends to rank European and North
American publications more highly than local ones. Almost 50
percent of respondents thought that there was a
disadvantage, while only 2.6 percent thought there was an
overall advantage. More than 47 percent did not know.
Almost 80 percent of respondents considered that
emerging researchers should have their own particular PBRF
category, a change that already has been instituted for the
current 2006 exercise, while a significant majority believed
that the next round should be based on the research
performance of academic units rather than individuals.
Dr
Ryan said concerns consistently expressed by AUS about the
danger of PBRF results being misused as a measure of
individual performance seemed to be well-founded, with 28
percent of respondents reporting that they were aware of
instances where PBRF scores or grades had been deployed,
against the express intention of the scheme’s architects, in
university promotions or appointments exercises.
The full
report can be viewed
at:
http://www.aus.ac.nz/branches/waikato/2006/PBRFsurvey.pdf
Also
in Tertiary Update this week
1. NZQA research worthless,
says AUS
2. Tertiary numbers down
3. Mixed report for
contact within sector
4. CPIT appoints new boss
5. Pay
dispute heads to mediation
6. Two-year degree on cards in
UK
7. French students to resume lessons
8. Texan VC
sacked for lavish spend-up
NZQA survey worthless, says
AUS
The Association of University Staff has labelled as
worthless survey results released yesterday by the New
Zealand Qualifications Authority, purporting to show that
New Zealanders have what is described as a “middling” level
of confidence in the quality of tertiary education provided.
A year-old telephone survey of 750 New Zealanders aged
eighteen years or over conducted by UMR Research indicated
that 36 percent of those surveyed have a positive view of
the quality of tertiary education, 36 percent a neutral view
and 24 percent a negative view. Few respondents hold strong
opinions, with 9 percent saying they have a lot of
confidence and an equal number having “hardly any
confidence”.
AUS National President, Professor Nigel
Haworth, said today that the publication of these results
was disappointing and contributed little to the current
debate about the future of the tertiary sector. In
particular, the report failed to define tertiary education
or to distinguish between a wide range of tertiary-education
providers, or the types of education or the qualifications
each provided.
Moreover, Professor Haworth said that
public confidence in some areas of the tertiary-education
sector may have been undermined because of the
politicisiation of some high-profile incidents over the past
few years.
“This information fails to provide any basis
on which to improve quality,” Professor Haworth said. “The
report tells us nothing that can be of use whatsoever in
improving and ensuring the quality of tertiary education,
and it seems extraordinary that a public-sector education
agency would distribute information of such poor
calibre.”
The Minister for Tertiary Education, Dr Michael
Cullen, could not be reached for comment.
Tertiary numbers
down
Most of New Zealand’s universities, polytechnics and
institutes of technology are reporting lower student numbers
than last year, following the processing of the first
semester’s enrolment figures. According to Education Review,
at least five universities have suffered a decline in both
domestic and international equivalent full-time students
(EFTS) so far this year, but two have bucked the trend and
increased domestic enrolments sufficiently to outweigh a
decline in international numbers. A fortnight ago, Victoria
reported a 4 percent increase in domestic students, of
around 483 EFTS, giving it a net student gain of 2 percent
after taking into account a 9 percent decline in
international numbers. Like Victoria, AUT reports that it
has experienced strong growth in domestic numbers, but a
decline in international numbers, giving it an overall
increase of 441 EFTS from last year.
Education Review
reports, however, that the University of Auckland is more
than 1,000 EFTS down on last year, Massey down by about 685,
Canterbury and Waikato down by 444 and 448 respectively,
while Otago is down by 333. Although Lincoln figures were
not supplied, it had forecast a decline in international
EFTS but an increase in domestic ones.
The decline in
international students has hit universities hard, with
Canterbury reporting, at the end of March, a 15.6 percent
decline compared with the same time last year. Auckland’s
international numbers have dropped by 14 percent, Waikato by
12 percent and Otago by 11 percent over the same
period.
Meanwhile, the country’s nineteen institutes of
technology and polytechnics are reporting only a slight
overall decline in core student numbers for the year.
According to Chair of the Institutes of Technology and
Polytechnics of New Zealand, Dr Neil Barnes, it is likely
that most will “catch-up” later in the year. While
enrolments for community education and from overseas
students are down, core subjects taught by the polytechnics
and institutes of technology are reported as holding up
well, with some areas, such as nursing, adding classes to
cope with the demand.
Mixed report for contact within
sector
A new report from the Ministry of Education shows
that contact between tertiary education providers and
stakeholders is wide-ranging, but that stakeholders
generally perceive providers as too busy and/or
under-resourced to have intensive and positive contact with
them. Providers, for their part, perceive contact to be
satisfactory.
The report, which is based on research
conducted in 2005, looks at how much contact there is
between New Zealand’s tertiary-education providers and their
stakeholders, and how good it is at producing results. In
order to form their views, the researchers examined the
charters and profiles of providers, conducted a postal
survey of providers to obtain details of their contact with
stakeholders and held focus-group interviews with what they
describe as key stakeholder groups.
Not surprisingly, a
major finding of the report is that information about
provider/stakeholder contact varies in quality and content,
and that industry in-house trainers have very little contact
with tertiary-education providers and stakeholders.
Surprisingly, stakeholders appear to comprise mainly of
industry groups and did not appear to include students or
staff or their representatives.
Among the recommendations
arising from the study are that “inspired advisory
committees” be developed by providers to form the hub around
which contact with stakeholders is created, that providers
develop a simple way of collecting stakeholder information
and that stakeholders regularly review their training needs
while working in partnership on tertiary education and
national social and economic goals.
There was also a
perception reported from the stakeholders consulted that the
focus of providers is more on completing their reporting
requirements, “ticking the right boxes”, than on engaging in
creative contact.
AUS National President, Professor Nigel
Haworth, said that, while the report may be useful in
looking at ways to improve communication within the sector,
it needed more than a postal questionnaire of
tertiary-education employers to provide a substantive
analysis of what is needed to enhance the quality of
education for students.
Professor Haworth also said
that, if a stakeholder analysis is to be carried out, then
it should include all stakeholders, not simply those few
favoured by some within the Ministry of Education.
The
report can be found at:
http://educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz/publications/tertiary/research-stakeholders.html
CPIT
appoints new boss
The troubled Christchurch Polytechnic
and Institute of Technology (CPIT) has announced the
appointment of Dr Neil Barnes as its new Chief Executive
Officer. Dr Barns, currently CEO of Nelson Marlborough
Institute of Technology (NMIT), will take up his new
position on 10 July.
Dr Barnes will replace the current
CEO, John Scott, who announced his retirement after the
high-profile Cool-IT scandal at the Polytechnic, and
statements from the then Associate Minister of Education
(Tertiary), Steve Maharey, that Mr Scott had failed to meet
the expected standards of judgement and decision-making
expected of senior executives leading public-education
institutions.
Hector Matthews, the CPIT Council Chair,
says he is delighted that Dr Barns has taken up the position
as the new CEO. “Dr Barns has a proven track record at
NMIT,” he said. “Neil has applied his academic skills to
lead a financially sound and educationally excellent
institute of technology that’s well regarded by the local
and national community.”
Mr Matthews said that, with
substantial changes to polytechnic sector funding expected
over the next few years, having a CEO who is aware of both
the history and current issues facing the sector was a
critical factor in the decision to appoint Dr Barns.
Dr
Barns is also Chair of the Board of the Institutes of
Technology and Polytechnics of New Zealand.
Worldwatch
Pay dispute heads to
mediation
University unions in the United Kingdom have
agreed to mediation in a bid to restart stalled pay
negotiations following what has been described as an
emergency meeting between representatives of AUT and Natfhe
and the Universities and Colleges Employers Association
(UCEA).
The unions have claimed a 23 percent pay increase
over the next three years, while the employers have offered
6 percent over two years. Union members have been engaged in
strike and other protest action over the last month, the
latter including a refusal by AUT members to set and mark
examination papers.
Although UCEA has previously said it
will not negotiate while the unions’ members continue to
take protest action, it has come under increasing pressure
as a number of universities threaten to deal directly with
the unions in order to break the impasse. The Times Higher
reports that vice-chancellors’ frustrations with UCEA are
expected to grow as the continuing boycott of exams and
assessments by the academic unions was about to enter a
crucial phase and cause serious damage to students.
AUT
General Secretary, Sally Hunt, said that, while the unions
are pleased that discussions are taking place, “talks about
talks” are not going to resolve the dispute. “It is vital we
get back around the table to agree to a deal that delivers
real increases for staff whose pay has declined so
dramatically over the years,” she said.
Mediated talks
are expected to get under way next Tuesday.
Two-year
degree on cards in UK
Universities in the United Kingdom
will press the Government to increase funding so that they
can deliver fast-track degrees, after suggestions from the
Higher Education Minister, Bill Rammell, that the
introduction of two-year degree courses could provide a way
of attracting more students from poorer backgrounds into
university study.
In a speech to the annual conference of
the Higher Education Funding Council for England, Mr Rammell
said the suggestion follows a pilot scheme launched in five
universities to see if three-year degrees could be
compressed into two-year programmes.
Mr Rammell said
that two-year degree courses could offer opportunities for
students who cannot afford to take three years to study. “We
are awaiting the outcomes of how more intensive courses
could operate in order to decide how to move forward,” he
said. “Universities have to be radically different in the
way they meet the needs of students. More flexible models
are required, reforming how people access higher education
provision.”
While students and lecturers welcomed the
greater flexibility, concerns were raised that universities
could lose out over the shorter courses without government
compensation. Michael Driscoll, Head of Campaigning for
Mainstream Universities and Vice-Chancellor of Middlesex
University, said that universities would not be keen to run
these programmes if they were purely a cost-saving measure.
From the Times Higher Education Supplement
French
students to resume lessons
Students at most of France’s
eighty-four universities are expected to return to classes
this week after two months of protests over the Government’s
ill-fated labour reforms disrupted courses and caused
millions of euros in damage. However, in a final act of
defiance, student representatives of thirty-one universities
voted at the weekend for another day of protest to demand
the withdrawal of further labour initiatives and immigration
reforms. Last week, the French Government was forced by
widespread national opposition to back down on its “first
job contract” reform, which would have allowed companies to
fire young workers without justification within a two-year
trial period.
Times Higher Education Supplement
Texan
VC sacked for lavish spend-up
The Board at the Texas
Southern University has voted to sack its Vice-Chancellor
after an internal audit disclosed that she had spent
$US647,949 of the University’s funds on personal expenses
over the past seven years. Most of the money in question was
used to furnish her home and landscape her garden. It
includes a $9,000 bed, a $14,000 couch and $138,000 worth of
landscaping at her personal home.
The Vice-Chancellor,
Dr Priscilla Slade, claimed that the landscaping charges
were an accidental payment.
In a letter published last
week by the Houston Chronicle, Dr Slade argued that all of
the questioned expenses had been covered by her expense
account (about $50,000 per year) and by her annual office
budget of $450,000. In the letter, she said the
investigation had begun after a Board member complimented
the choice of furniture at her home, and was told by Dr
Slade that the furniture was owned by the University.
Dr
Slade, who is contesting the audit’s findings, also faces a
criminal investigation.
Also cited in the audit,
according to the Houston Chronicle, is the University’s
former Chief Financial Officer, Quintin F. Wiggins, who
resigned under pressure last month. Mr. Wiggins allegedly
violated University policy while purchasing items for Dr
Slade’s home, according to the newspaper.
From the
Chronicle of Higher
Education
********************************************************************************
AUS
Tertiary Update is compiled weekly on Thursdays and
distributed freely to members of the Association of
University Staff and others. Back issues are available on
the AUS website: www.aus.ac.nz . Direct enquires should be
made to Marty Braithwaite, AUS Communications Officer,
email:
marty.braithwaite@aus.ac.nz