UCOL announces large cuts in wake of funding cuts
25 October 2012
UCOL announces large cuts in wake of funding cuts
UCOL is preparing to close 23 of its 110 programmes after learning that the Tertiary Education Commission has cut $2.6 million from its budget next year.
Next year UCOL loses funding for more than 10 percent of its students. It will lose 375 EFTS from the current 3,374. It is now looking to review, and probably close, a wide range of programmes at its Whanganui and Palmerston North campuses. TEU expects that approximately 33 equivalent full time staff could lose their jobs, but in real terms this will be up to 50 people directly affected.
The announcement follows a decision by the government earlier this year to put one-third of its level 1 and 2 student achievement funding up for tender - $38 million out of $115 million. When the minister announced the results of that tender process two-thirds of polytechnics had missed out on funding, as had other large level 1-2 providers like Lincoln University. The Tertiary Education Commission - the body that handled the tender process - admitted in its own documentation that it granted funding primarily on the basis of 'value for money' rather than quality of education.
Yesterday UCOL started a formal consultation process with staff who will be affected by its proposed changes. It will be reviewing Facilities Management, Tourism, Trades and Technology, Humanities & Business, Foundation and Fashion & Beauty programmes, and Computing. The polytechnic intends to make final decisions on its proposals by 21 November 2012.
UCOL's chief executive Paul McElroy told staff in an email earlier this week that he believes shifting Level 1 and 2 programme funding into a competitive model puts at risk our most vulnerable learners to the vagaries of the market, and is giving a clear signal for polytechnics to move out of these levels.
"Yet we know learners need to move through levels 1 and 2 to achieve at higher levels."
TEU’s UCOL branch president Tina Smith says these courses provide the chance for people in Palmerston North to learn life skills and job skills from highly respected academics and effective teachers.
"The community and especially young people of this region are the losers from these governments funding cuts."
"The government is forcing UCOL to throw away both students and staff. We can teach those students and they want to come to UCOL, but they won't get the chance because the government won't pay for it."
Without knowing the impact of his funding experiment the minister for tertiary education said earlier this year that he would like to open more of that funding to competitive tender.
Tina Smith says that the minister now has the evidence that his funding experiment is not working and he should review it immediately.
"This competitive funding model is costing students the chance to learn in their local community, it's costing good experienced teachers their jobs and its costing the government money. We should end the experiment now before any further damage is done."
ends