Autonomy of Māori Studies at Waikato University
O P E N L E T T E R
22 Aug 2018
Rt Hon
James Bolger Prof Neil Quigley
Chancellor
Vice-Chancellor
University of Waikato Council
University of Waikato
Kia Ora
Autonomy of
Māori Studies at Waikato University Te Pua Wānanga ki te
Ao
The VC of Waikato
University is proposing a new divisional structure that
threatens the autonomy of the Faculty of Māori and
Indigenous Studies (FMIS), amongst other units.
Under the current proposals, FMIS would be reduced from a faculty to a school and folded into a larger Division, along with Arts, Social Sciences and Law.
We note the University Strategy states:
Build more tangible teaching, research and strategic relationships with iwi and Māori communities, particularly with the Māori King, Waikato Tainui and the other iwi of the Kīngitanga, and the iwi represented on Te Rōpū Manukura.
In this light, we would like to ask three key questions:
1. How is the proposal consistent with the University's commitment to uphold the Treaty of Waitangi, notably the principle of tino rangatiratanga?
2. How is the proposal consistent with the University's active partnership with Waikato Tainui as mana whenua?
3. Was the proposal developed in
consultation with, and fully supported by, Te Rōpū
Manukura (Waikato's kaitiaki
group)?
Focus
FMIS is highly significant for Māori and indigenous studies. But it is just as significant for non-Māori and indigenous peoples in Aotearoa NZ and elsewhere, providing knowledge, world-views and resources that enhance diversity in a world that faces increasing division and factionalism.
Process
To date, the process is strongly reminiscent of the catastrophic moves at Unitec over the last few years, in which the Executive Leadership Team pushed through its own proposals, ignoring staff responses. One of the consequences was highly disturbing dissolution of Māori and Pasifika units and resources. There is a report on Unitec at the following websites:
http://teu.ac.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Blind-Faith-Deconstructing-Unitec.pdf
http://teu.ac.nz/2018/08/unitec-commissioner-warned/
We have two final questions:
• is there a real problem that needs to be fixed, other than the VC seeking to redistribute management loads and reporting lines?
• is there cogent evidence to support the proposal?
We urge the University to suspend the initiative.
nga mihi nui
Sincerely
David Cooke,
National Chair, QPEC