Researchers Shed Light On Vaccine Decisions
Research on vaccine hesitancy find the number one fact people want to know is risk of serious adverse effects.
Research into vaccine hesitancy
finds people’s biggest concern is severe adverse effects,
followed by how effective a vaccine is and how long its
protection will last.
The researchers from Waipapa
Taumata Rau, University of Auckland were prompted by low
vaccination rates in New Zealand post Covid-19, raising
fears of deadly outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases,
such as measles.
Vaccine hesitancy remains one of the top
ten public health threats identified by the World Health
Organisation.
“Identifying Kiwis’ priorities for
vaccine information will help health professionals and
policymakers provide the information they feel they need to
weigh up decisions about vaccinating themselves or their
tamariki,” lead investigator Associate Professor Amy Chan,
of the School of Pharmacy, says.
Previous research has
shown providing people with the information they feel they
need is a useful public health tool.
The researchers
explored the preferences of more than 600 New Zealanders
using an online survey that took them through a series of
decisions about vaccines by indicating what information
would most influence their choices.
For example, the
vaccine could provide longer protection but only be
available in hospitals versus shorter protection and widely
available in the community.
Overall, people most valued
information about adverse effects and how much protection
vaccines offered for how long.
Vaccine origin and route
of administration were least important.
This differed
slightly for people who tended to subscribe to conspiracy
theories about vaccines. They wanted to know how long the
vaccine had taken to develop and how many doses were
required and were less concerned about
effectiveness.
Health providers would be do well to
advise vaccine-hesitant people how long the vaccine had
taken to develop, and the total number of doses required,
Chan says.
- Read Vaccine decision-making in New Zealand: a discrete choice experiment