Undernews For 4 May 2009
UNDERNEWS
The news while there's still time to
do something about it
THE PROGRESSIVE
REVIEW
Editor: Sam Smith
EMAIL
US
REVIEW E-MAIL
UPDATES
REVIEW INDEX
UNDERNEWS
XML
FEED
PAGE ONE MUST
BOTH REPUBLICANS & DEMOCRATS LOSE GROUND TO
INDEPENDENTS
Pew Research - Over the first
four months of 2009, the Republican Party has continued to
lose adherents. In total, the GOP has lost roughly a quarter
of its base over the past five years.
But these Republican losses have not translated into substantial Democratic gains. So far in 2009, 35% of adults nationwide identify as Democrats, about the same as in 2008 (36%). While GOP identification has fallen seven points since 2004, the Democrats have gained only two points over that period. Instead, a growing number of Americans describe themselves as independents, 36% in 2009 compared with just 32% in 2008 and 30% in 2004.
Looking at the individual monthly surveys
since December suggests that both political parties are
facing declining membership in the wake of an engaging
election cycle. In the Pew Research Center's April 2009
survey, 33% identified as Democrats, down from 39% in
December 2008. Over the same period, the share calling
themselves Republicans has fallen from 26% to 22%. By
contrast, the number of independents has risen from 30% in
December to 39% now.
FEDERAL JUDGE PUNISHES TEACHER FOR CALLING
CREATIONISM 'NONSENSE'
Orange County Register,
CA - A Mission Viejo high school history teacher
violated the First Amendment by disparaging Christians
during a classroom lecture, a federal judge ruled today.
James Corbett, a 20-year teacher at Capistrano Valley High
School, was found guilty of referring to Creationism as
"religious, superstitious nonsense" during a 2007 classroom
lecture, denigrating his former Advanced Placement European
history student, Chad Farnan.
The decision is the culmination of a 16-month legal battle between Corbett and Farnan - a conflict the judge said should remind teachers of their legal "boundaries" as public school employees.
"Corbett states an unequivocal belief that Creationism is 'superstitious nonsense,'" U.S. District Court Judge James Selna said in a 37-page ruling released from his Santa Ana courtroom. "The court cannot discern a legitimate secular purpose in this statement, even when considered in context."
In a December 2007 lawsuit, Farnan, then a sophomore, accused Corbett of repeatedly promoting hostility toward Christians in class and advocating "irreligion over religion" in violation of the First Amendment's establishment clause.
The establishment clause prohibits the government from making any law "respecting an establishment of religion" and has been interpreted by U.S. courts to also prohibit government employees from displaying religious hostility.
"We are thrilled with the judge's ruling and feel it sets great precedent," said Farnan's attorney, Jennifer Monk, who works for the Christian legal group Advocates for Faith & Freedom in Murrieta. "Hopefully, teachers in the future, including Dr. Corbett, will think about what they're saying and attempt to ensure they're not violating the establishment clause as Dr. Corbett has done."
Chad Farnan and his parents did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment, but released a prepared statement through their attorney: "We are proud of Chad's courageous stand and thrilled with the judge's ruling. It is a vindication of his constitutional rights."
Farnan's original lawsuit asked
for damages and attorney's fees. These issues - plus a
possible court injunction prohibiting Corbett from making
hostile remarks about religion - will be considered in court
at a future, undetermined date, Monk said. . .
JUSTICE SCALIA: WHAT I SAY DOESN'T APPLY TO
ME
Martha Neil, ABA Journal - Last year,
when law professor Joel Reidenberg wanted to show his
Fordham University class how readily private information is
available on the Internet, he assigned a group project. It
was collecting personal information from the Web about
himself.
This year, after U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia made public comments that seemingly may have questioned the need for more protection of private information, Reidenberg assigned the same project. Except this time Scalia was the subject, the prof explains to the ABA Journal in a telephone interview.
His class turned in a 15-page dossier that included not only Scalia's home address, home phone number and home value, but his food and movie preferences, his wife's personal e-mail address and photos of his grandchildren, reports Above the Law.
And, as Scalia himself made clear in a statement to Above the Law, he isn't happy about the invasion of his privacy:
"Professor Reidenberg's exercise is an example of
perfectly legal, abominably poor judgment. Since he was not
teaching a course in judgment, I presume he felt no
responsibility to display any," the justice says, among
other comments.
WHAT PORTUGAL CAN TEACH US ABOUT DEALING
WITH DRUGS
Glenn Greenwald, Cato - On July
1, 2001, a nationwide law in Portugal took effect that
decriminalized all drugs, including cocaine and heroin.
Under the new legal framework, all drugs were
"decriminalized," not "legalized." Thus, drug possession for
personal use and drug usage itself are still legally
prohibited, but violations of those prohibitions are deemed
to be exclusively administrative violations and are removed
completely from the criminal realm. Drug trafficking
continues to be prosecuted as a criminal offense.
While other states in the European Union have developed various forms of de facto decriminalization - whereby substances perceived to be less serious (such as cannabis) rarely lead to criminal prosecution - Portugal remains the only EU member state with a law explicitly declaring drugs to be "decriminalized." Because more than seven years have now elapsed since enactment of Portugal's decriminalization system, there are ample data enabling its effects to be assessed.
Notably, decriminalization has become increasingly popular in Portugal since 2001. Except for some far-right politicians, very few domestic political factions are agitating for a repeal of the 2001 law. And while there is a widespread perception that bureaucratic changes need to be made to Portugal's decriminalization framework to make it more efficient and effective, there is no real debate about whether drugs should once again be criminalized. More significantly, none of the nightmare scenarios touted by preenactment decriminalization opponents - from rampant increases in drug usage among the young to the transformation of Lisbon into a haven for "drug tourists" - has occurred.
The political consensus in favor of
decriminalization is unsurprising in light of the relevant
empirical data. Those data indicate that decriminalization
has had no adverse effect on drug usage rates in Portugal,
which, in numerous categories, are now among the lowest in
the EU, particularly when compared with states with
stringent criminalization regimes. Although
post-decriminalization usage rates have remained roughly the
same or even decreased slightly when compared with other EU
states, drug-related pathologies - such as sexually
transmitted diseases and deaths due to drug usage - have
decreased dramatically. Drug policy experts attribute those
positive trends to the enhanced ability of the Portuguese
government to offer treatment programs to its citizens -
enhancements made possible, for numerous reasons, by
decriminalization.
MUCH MORE
SMALL BANKS BEING CHARGED FOR BIG BANKS'
PROBLEMS
Wenatchee World, WA - Small
community banks - like Cashmere Valley Bank - that had
nothing to do with the excesses of big Wall Street firms
that led to the financial meltdown are now paying a price
they protest is unfair.
Community bankers find themselves under tighter scrutiny from federal regulators. They say the $700 billion financial bailout has favored large institutions. And they are upset about a special assessment the government wants to charge to shore up the Federal Deposit Insurance Fund, which failed banks are draining.
"We've run a successful, safe financial institution," Ken Martin, president of the Cashmere-based bank said. "Those of us who were responsible and still exist are getting hit with those huge premium increases. And at the same time they're giving these huge bailout amounts to the Citigroups."
In 2007, Cashmere Valley Bank paid about $89,000 in 2007 in premiums to the FDIC, the federal entity that insures bank deposits.
This year, it expects to pay $1.35 million in premiums, plus an additional $900,000 to $1.8 million "special assessment" needed because the premium increase still won't be enough to shore up the FDIC.
"The
small, community bank is just being hammered with these huge
premiums," Martin said. "It's huge. That's like 25 percent
of our 2008 earnings in increased premiums.". . .
GREEN LIGHTBULBS CAN BE DEADLY FOR THOSE WHO
MAKE THEM
Times, UK - When British
consumers are compelled to buy energy-efficient lightbulbs
from 2012, they will save up to 5m tons of carbon dioxide a
year from being pumped into the atmosphere. In China,
however, a heavy environmental price is being paid for the
production of green light bulbs in cost-cutting
factories.
Large numbers of Chinese workers have been poisoned by mercury, which forms part of the compact fluorescent light bulbs. A surge in foreign demand, set off by a European Union directive making these bulbs compulsory within three years, has also led to the reopening of mercury mines that have ruined the environment. . .
Making the bulbs requires workers to handle mercury in either solid or liquid form because a small amount of the metal is put into each bulb to start the chemical reaction that creates light.
Mercury is recognized as a health hazard by authorities worldwide because its accumulation in the body can damage the nervous system, lungs and kidneys, posing a particular threat to babies in the womb and young children.
The risks are illustrated by guidance from the British government, which says that if a compact fluorescent light bulb is broken in the home, the room should be cleared for 15 minutes because of the danger of inhaling mercury vapor.
Documents issued by the Chinese health ministry, instructions to doctors and occupational health propaganda all describe mercury poisoning in lighting factories as a growing public health concern.
"Pregnant women and mothers who are breastfeeding must not be allowed to work in a unit where mercury is present," states one official rulebook. . .
Tests on hundreds of employees have found dangerously
high levels of mercury in their bodies and many have
required hospital treatment, according to interviews with
workers, doctors and local health officials in the cities of
Foshan and Guangzhou.
GOOGLE MAY CHARGE FOR YOU
TUBE
Slashdot - A couple of weeks ago,
Google's CEO mentioned to investors that they might start
charging You Tube's users for viewing content: 'With respect
to how it will get monetized, our first priority, as you
pointed out, is on the advertising side. We do expect over
time to see micro payments and other forms of subscription
models coming as well. But our initial focus is on
advertising. We will be announcing additional things in that
area literally very, very soon.' With the recent Disney-Hulu
deal, Google is under increasing pressure to generate more
revenue and at the same time attract more premium content.
That means we might see payment options coming even sooner
than expected.
SEX OUT, TEXT IN
Monica Hesse,
Washington Post - The relationship did not end because
of Elizabeth Fishkin's boyfriend's text aversion. On the
other hand, it didn't exactly help.
Like the time when they were supposed to meet for dinner, and Fishkin texted him to say she was waiting at the restaurant bar. Thirty minutes later, she finally spotted him. Standing outside. He'd never gotten the message -- didn't even realize what his cellphone's buzzing had signified. No disrespect intended; he just wasn't a texting kind of guy.
But Fishkin, who works in advertising, is a texting kind of gal. Nothing obsessive, maybe five times a day -- she just likes the ease, the directness, the speed of the medium. Texting is her language. . .
Months later: another date, another guy, another technological incompatibility. This time she was out with someone who wanted to text . . everyone.
"He kept talking about Twitter." Fishkin rolls her eyes. "Ashton Kutcher. Twitter, Twitter, Twitter."
Can a texter love a Twitterer? Can star-crossed lovers overcome wire-crossed gadgets? Can these relationships be saved?. . .
The process of asking someone on a date can historically be described as such: Twenty years ago, you either did it face-to-face or picked up the phone.
Today, you can be a phone person, an e-mail person, a text person, a Skype person, a Facebook wall person, a Twitter person, an instant-messaging person, or you can just stare creepily into your webcam like that manga girl on YouTube.
Each form of communication has its own followers and rules, which means dating today is a law of inverse proportions: As ways to communicate increase, the chances you will date someone who speaks your technological language decrease.
Sexual
compatibility, out. Textual compatibility, in.
FOOD SHORTAGES THREATEN TO BRING DOWN
COUNTRIES
Lester Brown, Scientific
American - For many years I have studied global
agricultural, population, environmental and economic trends
and their interactions. The combined effects of those trends
and the political tensions they generate point to the
breakdown of governments and societies. Yet I, too, have
resisted the idea that food shortages could bring down not
only individual governments but also our global
civilization.
I can no longer ignore that risk. . .
In six of the past nine years world grain production has fallen short of consumption, forcing a steady drawdown in stocks. When the 2008 harvest began, world carryover stocks of grain (the amount in the bin when the new harvest begins) were at 62 days of consumption, a near record low. In response, world grain prices in the spring and summer of last year climbed to the highest level ever.
As demand for food rises faster than supplies are growing, the resulting food-price inflation puts severe stress on the governments of countries already teetering on the edge of chaos. Unable to buy grain or grow their own, hungry people take to the streets. Indeed, even before the steep climb in grain prices in 2008, the number of failing states was expanding. Many of their problems stem from a failure to slow the growth of their populations. But if the food situation continues to deteriorate, entire nations will break down at an ever increasing rate. We have entered a new era in geopolitics. In the 20th century the main threat to international security was superpower conflict; today it is failing states. It is not the concentration of power but its absence that puts us at risk.
States fail when national governments can no longer provide personal security, food security and basic social services such as education and health care. They often lose control of part or all of their territory. When governments lose their monopoly on power, law and order begin to disintegrate. After a point, countries can become so dangerous that food relief workers are no longer safe and their programs are halted; in Somalia and Afghanistan, deteriorating conditions have already put such programs in jeopardy.
Failing states are of
international concern because they are a source of
terrorists, drugs, weapons and refugees, threatening
political stability everywhere. Somalia, number one on the
2008 list of failing states, has become a base for piracy.
Iraq, number five, is a hotbed for terrorist training.
Afghanistan, number seven, is the world's leading supplier
of heroin. Following the massive genocide of 1994 in Rwanda,
refugees from that troubled state, thousands of armed
soldiers among them, helped to destabilize neighboring
Democratic Republic of the Congo (number six).
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT HAS DIFFERENT RULES FOR
BACKERS OF ISRAEL AND PALESTINE
James G
Abourezk, Counterpunch - Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman
had been charged in 2005 with the crime of espionage;
specifically, handing over to Israel secret information they
had retrieved from Larry Franklin, who was then a policy
analyst in the U.S. Defense Department, working for Douglas
Feith and Paul Wolfowitz. Franklin pleaded guilty to
relaying top secret information on Iran to Rosen and
Weissman, and was sentenced to 12 years and 7 months in
prison, a term he is currently serving.
In the New York Times story detailing the Justice Department's decision to drop the charges against Rosen and Weissman, the prosecutors claimed that the presiding federal judge, T.S. Ellis III, had raised the bar for the prosecution to prove its case against the two to a level they did not believe they could meet. The judge said that the prosecutors could only prevail if they could prove that Rosen and Weissman "knew that their distribution of the information would harm U.S. national security." That was enough to make them dismiss the charges. . .
Turn now the case of Sami Al-Arian, who was a college professor in Florida. Sami is a Palestinian, born in Kuwait. And why wasn't he born in Palestine like a good Palestinian should be? Because, most likely, his parents were chased out of Palestine when Israel undertook its ethnic cleansing of that land in order to create an exclusive Jewish state.
Al Arian was charged in 2005 in a 50 count indictment essentially with a plethora of terrorism charges. The trial lasted six months, with some 80 witnesses and 400 transcripts of intercepted phone conversations and faxes.
At the end of the prosecution's case, Al Arian's lawyers rested without offering any evidence or witnesses in his defense. After 13 days of deliberation, the jury acquitted Al Arian on 8 of 17 counts, and deadlocked on the other with 10 to 2 favoring acquittal. Two of the co-defendants charged along with Al Arian were totally acquitted.
Undaunted, the Justice Department prosecutors said they were considering re-trying Al Arian on the deadlocked jury charges, one of which carried a life sentence.
Rather than fighting on, Al Arian agreed to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to contribute services to or for the benefit of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (which is designated as a terrorist organization, but which the FBI admitted during trial had never carried out an attack outside of Israel. The United States has designated a number of Palestinian liberation groups as terrorists at the behest of Israel—groups that have never attacked the United States).
Al Arian had spent years in solitary confinement awaiting his trial. As part of his plea agreement the prosecution agreed not to charge Al Arian with any other crimes, and Al Arian agreed to expedited deportation.
He was, however, nearly re-charged when he refused to testify against another Palestinian organization. He went on a hunger strike, dangerous for a diabetic, but finally the prosecutors agreed that the agreement exempted him from testifying in other cases.
One would have thought
that, following the jury's decision, the bar set by the jury
in the Al Arian case would be so high that the prosecution
would finally leave him alone. But there is apparently a
difference between a Palestinian patriot and Americans
spying for Israel. One group has a powerful lobby in
Washington, and the other has nothing, except the urging of
that powerful lobby to go after any Palestinian activist
with criminal charges or anything else they can get their
hands on.
OBAMA PROMISES SOME PROTECTION FROM OFFSHORE
SCAMS
The following is good news, but it deals
- as with the matter of torture - with only a part of the
problem. It appears that the Obama administration has no
intention of letting us know just who benefited in a large
way from offshore tax avoidance and for how much. One
reason: it is likely that a large number of them also
benefited indirectly from the bank bailout. In other words,
they double dipped: first they didn't pay any taxes and,
second, they got a taxpayer subsidy. It's unlikely we'll
ever know, but it's one of the best explanations for all the
insupportable secrecy about that the bank
bailout.
Bloomberg - President
Barack Obama today will propose to outlaw three offshore
tax-avoidance techniques U.S. companies such as Caterpillar
Inc. and Procter & Gamble Co. want to use to save $190
billion over the next decade and make it riskier for
Americans to stash money in tax-haven banks.
Obama and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner are going after a strategy that allows U.S.-based multinational companies to effectively hide from the Internal Revenue Service the role their foreign subsidiaries play in shifting profits into low- tax jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands, an administration official said.
The proposal, affecting tax rules known as "check the box," would net $86.5 billion in revenue between 2011-2019 by overhauling regulations created in Democrat Bill Clinton's administration and later written into law by a Republican- controlled Congress after Clinton tried to withdraw the rules. . .
Obama also would shift the burden of proof to individuals when the IRS alleges assets are being hidden in certain offshore bank accounts, the White House said in a statement.
"This is bad stuff," Kenneth Kies, a tax lobbyist at the Washington firm Federal Policy Group, said of Obama's plans. "This is going to be the biggest fight for the corporate community in the next two years." Kies represents General Electric Co., Anheuser-Busch Cos. and Microsoft Corp., among others. . .
In 2004, U.S.-based multinational corporations paid about $16 billion in U.S. taxes while earning about $700 billion offshore, or an effective tax rate of about 2.3 percent, according to the White House statement. The top marginal tax rate for U.S. companies is 35 percent; drug companies such as Amgen Inc. and technology companies such as Microsoft are among companies that make the biggest use of tax-deferral benefits. .
When the Clinton administration tried to rescind the benefits of the tax rules in such cases, companies mounted a lobbying effort and got Congress to back the rule, a White House official said. Obama believes the rules have no economic substance other than avoiding U.S. tax, the official said.
Obama's other corporate tax plans are patterned on those made in 2007 by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel, a New York Democrat, an administration official said. . .
For individuals, Obama will propose shifting the burden of proof when the IRS believes money is being hidden offshore. In cases where individuals bank with financial institutions that haven't agreed to report certain account information to the IRS, the individual will have to prove he or she doesn't own the account, rather than requiring the IRS to prove ownership.
Tales from the past. .
.
From the Review's coverage of the
Clinton & Arkansas corruption
story
Progressive Review, 1998 -
According to the London Telegraph's Ambrose Evans-Prichard,
"[Drug dealer Barry] Seal was probably the biggest importer
of cocaine in American history. Between 1980 and his
assassination in 1986, his team of pilots smuggled in 36
metric tons of cocaine, 104 tons of marijuana and three tons
of heroin, according to a close associate of Seal. The sums
of money involved were staggering. At his death, Seal left a
number of operational bank accounts. One of them, at the
Cayman Islands branch of the Fuji Bank, currently has an
interest-earning balance of
$1,645,433,000."
Progressive Review, 1996 - An independent investigator finds evidence of an electronic transfer of $50 million from the Arkansas Development Financial Authority to a bank in the Cayman Islands. Grand Cayman has a population of 18,000, 570 commercial banks, one bank regulator and a bank secrecy law. It is a favorite destination spot for laundered drug money.
Progressive Review, 1998 - Department of Justice announcement: "James Tjahaja Riady will pay a record $8.6 million in criminal fines and plead guilty to a felony charge of conspiring to defraud the United States by unlawfully reimbursing campaign donors with foreign corporate funds in violation of federal election law, the Justice Department's Campaign Financing Task Force and the United States Attorney in Los Angeles announced today. In addition, LippoBank California, a California state-chartered bank affiliated with Lippo Group, will plead guilty to 86 misdemeanor counts charging its agents, Riady and John Huang, with making illegal foreign campaign contributions from 1988 through 1994. . .
"The $8.6 million fine represents the largest sanction imposed in a campaign finance matter in the history of the United States . . . During the period of August 1992 through October 1992, shortly after Riady pledged $1 million in support of Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton's campaign for the Presidency of the United States, contributions made by Huang were reimbursed with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account Riady maintained at Lippo Bank and then distributed to Huang in cash. . .
"The purpose of
the contributions was to obtain various benefits from
various campaign committees and candidates for Lippo Group
and LippoBank, including: access, meetings, and time with
politicians, elected officials, and other high-level
government officials. . . a repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act
which limited business opportunities for
LippoBank."
PACIFIC MERCURY LEVELS COULD RISE
50%
Tree Hugger - According to a new study, if
mercury levels continue to rise at the rate they're
predicted to rise, the amount of mercury in the Pacific will
increase by 50% over the next 40 years. The study also shows
just how the mercury in emissions from around the world wind
up in the North Pacific Ocean:
"Methylmercury is produced
in mid-depth ocean waters by processes linked to the "ocean
rain." Algae, which are produced in sunlit waters near the
surface, die quickly and "rain" downward to greater water
depths. At depth, the settling algae are decomposed by
bacteria and the interaction of this decomposition process
in the presence of mercury results in the formation of
methylmercury. Many steps up the food chain later, predators
like tuna receive methylmercury from the fish they consume.
. . it appears the recent mercury enrichment of the sampled
Pacific Ocean waters is caused by emissions originating from
fallout near the Asian coasts. The mercury-enriched waters
then enter a long-range eastward transport by large ocean
circulation currents," said USGS scientist and coauthor
David Krabbenhoft.
CRASH TALK
Guardian, UK- When the former prime
minister Dominique de Villepin warned that there was a risk
of revolution in France, it was not just because he wanted
to make life difficult for his arch-rival Nicolas Sarkozy.
It was also because social unrest is genuinely on the rise.
Yesterday thousands of protesters took to the streets - not
as many as the millions who protested in March, but this was
a respectable turnout, considering that it was the third
national protest at the government's handling of the global
downturn in four months.
They are not just marching: universities have ground to a halt for three months over attempts to rewrite the terms of employment contracts for lecturers. There has been a wave of "bossnappings", where chief executives arriving at plants to announce layoffs found themselves barred from leaving. There have been commando-style "picnics" in supermarkets, where people feast from shelves shouting "we will not pay for your crisis". The protests are local and apparently spontaneous. Union officials find themselves not so much leading the action as trying to head it off. In five out of seven cases, bossnapping was used against foreign-owned companies (Sony, Caterpillar, 3M) which are reputed to be more cavalier about laying off workers than their French counterparts. Nor are strikes mere stunts. They represent a widespread feeling that if the president can pay billions to preserve the boss class, and their shares, he should do the same to protect workers. .
France has one of the highest rates of youth
unemployment in the developed world, with about one quarter
of its 2.5 million unemployed under the age of 25.
Unsilent
Generation - For more than a century, a main tenet
of big business has been to prevent union participation in
the organization and management of industrial production.
The idea that the UAW could actually take part in setting
the priorities of one of the big three automakers has been
unthinkable, and all such earlier efforts by the union have
been effectively crushed.
As Harold Meyerson succinctly wrote in the Washington Post last December: "In its glory days, under the leadership of Walter Reuther, the UAW was the most farsighted institution - not just the most farsighted union - in America." Meyerson continues:
Even before he became UAW president, Reuther and a team of brilliant lieutenants would drive the Big Three's top executives crazy by producing a steady stream of proposals for management. In the immediate aftermath of Pearl Harbor, Reuther, then head of the union's General Motors division, came up with a detailed plan for converting auto plants to defense factories more quickly than the industry's leaders did. At the end of the war, he led a strike at GM with a set of demands that included putting union and public representatives on GM's board.
"We are the architects of
America's future,"Reuther said at the UAW's 1947 convention.
It was actually the UAW that first promoted the idea of a
small car, exactly 50 years ago. The union's research
department set forth its plan in a 1949 pamphlet entitled "A
Small Car Named Desire.'' As Meyerson writes, the pamphlet
"suggested that Detroit not put all its bets on bigness,
that a substantial share of American consumers would welcome
smaller cars that cost less and burned fuel more
efficiently." But because the union had no real role in the
management of the auto industry, it got nowhere. And as
Meyerson pointed out on the American Prospect, the UAW
subsequently became more insular and short-sighted in the
face of foreign competition and downsizing, and "stood
shoulder to shoulder with management in opposing decades of
bills that would have raised fuel-efficiency
standards."
DID RICE ADMIT PART IN TORTURE
CRIME?
David Edwards and John Byrne, Raw
Story - In little-noticed comments, the former White
House counsel for President Richard Nixon John Dean said
Thursday that former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice may
have unwittingly admitted to a criminal conspiracy when
questioned about torture by a group of student videographers
at Stanford. . .
In a video that surfaced Thursday, Rice said, "The president instructed us that nothing we would do would be outside of our obligation, legal obligations under the convention against torture. . . I conveyed the authorization of the administration to the agency. And so by definition, if it was authorized by the president, it did not violate our obligations under the Convention Against Torture."
Her comments raised eyebrows from online observers, who compared Rice's answer to that of Richard Nixon's infamous quip: "When the President does it, that means that it's not illegal."
Dean said he found Rice's comments "surprising"and put her in a legal mire of possible conspiracy.
"She tried to say she didn't authorize anything, then proceeded to say she did pass orders along to the CIA to engage in torture if it was legal by the standard of the Department of Justice," Dean said. "This really puts her right in the middle of a common plan, as it's known in international law, or a conspiracy, as it's known in American law, and this indeed is a crime. If it indeed happened the way we think it did happen.". . .
Olbermann asked Dean whether Obama was violating the Geneva Conventions prohibiting torture himself by refusing to prosecute those responsible.
"He is indeed is in violation
if the United States does not undertake investigation of
this, or ultimately prosecution, if that's necessary," Dean
asserted. "It's not only the Geneva Convention; the
Convention Against Torture also requires this. There are no
exceptions with torture. There are no real things like
"torture light." The world community I think is going to
hold the United States responsible, and if we don't proceed,
somebody is going to proceed."
AID AGENCIES LIVING HIGH IN
KABUL
Patrick Cockburn, Independent, UK -
Vast sums of money are being lavished by Western aid
agencies on their own officials in Afghanistan at a time
when extreme poverty is driving young Afghans to fight for
the Taliban. The going rate paid by the Taliban for an
attack on a police checkpoint in the west of the country is
$4, but foreign consultants in Kabul, who are paid out of
overseas aids budgets, can command salaries of $250,000 to
$500,000 a year. . .
The high degree of wastage of aid money in Afghanistan has long been an open secret. In 2006, Jean Mazurelle, the then country director of the World Bank, calculated that between 35 per cent and 40 per cent of aid was "badly spent". "The wastage of aid is sky-high," he said. "There is real looting going on, mainly by private enterprises. It is a scandal." . . .
Whole districts of Kabul have already been taken over or rebuilt to accommodate Westerners working for aid agencies or embassies. "I have just rented out this building for $30,000 a month to an aid organization," said Torialai Bahadery, the director of Property Consulting Afghanistan, which specializes in renting to foreigners. "It was so expensive because it has 24 rooms with en-suite bathrooms as well as armored doors and bullet-proof windows," he explained, pointing to a picture of a cavernous mansion.
Though 77 per cent of Afghans lack access to clean water, Mr Bahadery said that aid agencies and the foreign contractors who work for them insist that every bedroom should have an en-suite bathroom and this often doubles the cost of accommodation.
In
addition to the expensive housing the expatriates in Kabul
are invariably protected by high-priced security companies
and each house is converted into a fortress. The freedom of
movement of foreigners is very limited. "I am not even
allowed to go into Kabul's best hotel," complained one woman
working for a foreign government aid organisation. She added
that to travel to a part of Afghanistan deemed wholly free
of Taliban by Afghans, she had to go by helicopter and then
be taken to where she wanted to go in an armored
vehicle.
BANKERS STILL RUNNING WASHINGTON; BANKRUPTCY
REFORM
Arianna Huffington - Just this
week, the bankers and their lobbyists -- who you might have
reasonably thought would be the political equivalent of
lepers in the halls of power these days -- have kneecapped
substantive bankruptcy reform in the Senate, helped pull the
plug on a government-brokered deal with Chrysler, and tried
feverishly to throw up a roadblock in the way of credit card
reform in the House.
According to Sen. Dick Durbin, the banks "are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place.". .
The banks scored a lopsided victory when the Senate rejected an amendment that would have allowed homeowners facing foreclosure to renegotiate their mortgages under the guidance of a bankruptcy judge. The measure would have helped 1.7 million homeowners keep their houses, and preserved an additional $300 billion in home equity. . .
But the banking lobbyists went after it with guns a-blazing - even after Durbin and the measure's other backers seriously diluted the bill. . . . And their aim was true -- and deadly. Heading into the vote, those pushing for reform hoped to gather the 60 supporters needed to bring the cramdown amendment to a final vote. Instead, Durbin struggled to find 45 Senators willing to side with consumers. The final tally: Bankers 51, Consumers 45.
Twelve Democrats sided with the banks -- Max Baucus, Michael Bennet, Robert Byrd, Tom Carper, Byron Dorgan, Tim Johnson, Mary Landrieu, Blanche Lincoln, Ben Nelson, Mark Pryor, Arlen Specter, and Jon Tester -- as did every Republican who voted. . .
As for credit card reform, the House's resounding 357-70 passage of Carolyn Maloney's Credit Card Holders' Bill of Rights would seem like a rare defeat for the banking lobbyists who furiously opposed it. But a number of elements of the legislation demonstrate that even when the bankers lose, they still win. For instance, despite the desperate urgency of the situation, all but one of the consumer-friendly provisions of the bill won't take effect for a year. And the bill doesn't contain any cap on credit card interest rates -- an amendment to cap rates at 18 percent never got any traction. And, of course, the bankers will get another crack at derailing credit card reform when the Senate takes up its version of the bill, sponsored by Chris Dodd, later this month.
So no matter
how badly the banking industry fails and how much its
failures cost us, it continues to be Washington's 800 lb
gorilla -- and the greatest risk to Barack Obama's
presidency.
BREVITAS
PIG
FLU
From an interview by Science Insider with Virologist
Ruben Donis, chief of the molecular virology and vaccines
branch at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Q: What do you know about this swine flu virus?
R.D.: We know it's quite similar to viruses that were circulating in the United States and are still circulating in the United States and that are self-limiting, and they usually only are found in Midwestern states where there is swine farming
STUPID SCHOOL SYSTEM
TRICKS
Marin Independent Journal, CA - When
a few of the English learners in Jack Lieberman's class
asked him for translations of some off-color English
phrases, the Tamalpais Adult School teacher didn't think
much of it. After all, Lieberman said, his students were all
adults - and needed to know the meaning of certain words in
order to avoid making embarrassing mistakes on the job or
with friends. "These were bad words the students didn't want
to mix up with other words, like 'sheet' or 'beach,'" said
Lieberman, a six-year veteran of the adult school, which is
operated by the Tamalpais Union High School District. "It's
not in the curriculum, but we had about 10 minutes left
before a break, and the students had made the request. I
tried to do it as tastefully as possible." . . . So
Lieberman was shocked last month when school Director Deidre
Shannon asked him to come to her office the next morning.
Three days later, Lieberman was out of a job.
ARTS &
CULTURE
Metafilter - Fifty years ago. Some
great jazz was caught on camera that year: Ahmad Jamal Trio: Darn That Dream
(1959); Horace Silver: Señor Blues (1959); Art Blakey's Jazz Messengers: Night in
Tunisia (1959); Gerry Mulligan/Art Farmer: Moonlight In
Vermont (1959); Miles Davis / Gil Evans Orchestra
(1959); Bud Powell with Kenny Clarke - Get Happy
(1959); The Future of Jazz TV show: Billy
Taylor/George Russell/Bill Evans/etc. (1959 or possibly
1958).
The head of the DC public libraries, Ginnie Cooper, has been on a book selling spree. A couple of libraries have revolted, including the Cleveland Park branch, which has been buying back its own books from Amazon, probably with funds from its Friends of the Library. But as Bruce Suderow reports in DC Watch: "Unfortunately for every library that is trying to undo Cooper's mischief, there are ten that support her decisions, probably out of fear. One branch head told me flatly, 'I'm a company man.'"
OBAMALAND
Those who
think the Review was too tough on Obama - giving him 30
out of 100 points for his first 100 days - might want to
check out the Black Agenda Report. They gave him
25.
OUTLYING PRECINCTS
Politico - Next week, porn star
Stormy Daniels launches her "Listening Tour" across
Louisiana. The star of such films as "Operation Desert
Stormy" will appear in Baton Rouge and New Orleans in order
to "meet with Louisiana men and women and listen to the
issues and concerns they struggle with everyday" and gauge a
potential run against Sen. David Vitter (R.). The
untraditional path into politics for Daniels, a 29-year-old
with no party affiliation at present, began in February when
fans launched the website DraftStormy.com to encourage a run. .
Daniels hopes that her career as a porn star (and producer,
writer and director) won't prove much of a hindrance, since
Vitter has some sexual history of his own
MID
EAST
J. Raimondo, Anti War - Israeli
spying in the U.S. is a subject the American media has not
dared cover. Except for Antiwar.com and a few other sources,
coverage of the Rosen-Weissman case has been sketchy to
nonexistent. . . The decision to drop this case was clearly
made at the top, not by the local prosecutors. Indeed, there
was reportedly an energetic internal debate. The lawyers for
Rosen and Weissman, for their part, clearly credited the
Obama administration for the decision to quash the case, as
the Washington Post reported. . . Whether this case was
dropped because it became a trading card in Obama's
increasingly contentious relations with the Israelis or
because it was the victim of Israel's increasingly
aggressive intervention in American politics we'll leave for
future historians to decide. What is clear, at this point,
is that it is now effectively legal for AIPAC and its allies
to function quite openly as an intelligence-gathering entity
for the Israeli state. The line between lobbying and
espionage has been erased, at least as far as Israel's
activities in the U.S. are
concerned.
TORTURE
CNN - he more often Americans go to
church, the more likely they are to support the torture of
suspected terrorists, according to a new survey. More than
half of people who attend services at least once a week --
54 percent -- said the use of torture against suspected
terrorists is "often" or "sometimes" justified. Only 42
percent of people who "seldom or never" go to services
agreed, according to the analysis released Wednesday by the
Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. White evangelical
Protestants were the religious group most likely to say
torture is often or sometimes justified -- more than six in
10 supported it. People unaffiliated with any religious
organization were least likely to back it. Only four in 10
of them did.
ABC News - As the secrets about the CIA's interrogation techniques continue to come out, there's new information . . . two private contractors who were apparently directing the brutal sessions that President Obama calls torture. . . According to current and former government officials, the CIA's secret waterboarding program was designed and assured to be safe by two well-paid psychologists now working out of an unmarked office building in Spokane, Washington. Bruce Jessen and Jim Mitchell, former military officers, together founded Mitchell Jessen and Associates. Both men declined to speak to ABC News citing non-disclosure agreements with the CIA. But sources say Jessen and Mitchell together designed and implemented the CIA's interrogation program.
FREEDOM &
JUSTICE
Denver Post - Criminal charges
against a junior at Dakota Ridge High School, who wore a
T-shirt saying "NOBAMA" before an appearance and speech last
fall by Michelle Obama at the school, were dropped. Blake
Benson, 17, was one of three students at the school who
chose to "stay and campaign" for Sen. John McCain when
Michelle Obama spoke at the school on Nov. 3. At the time of
his arrest, Benson was holding a McCain-Palin campaign sign.
He was handcuffed and taken to the school's administrative
office, said Dan Recht, a Denver lawyer who took the case on
behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union, which
represented Benson. . . "There is no more classically
protected speech than peacefully protesting against one
candidate and for another," said Recht. "What Blake Benson
was doing is as American as apple pie." Jacki Kelley,
spokesperson for the Jefferson County Sheriff's Department,
said that the decision to drop the charge was made three
weeks after the incident after a consultation with the
Jefferson County district attorney's
office.
ITALY
BBC - Silvio Berlusconi has demanded
an apology from his wife after she accused him of
"consorting with minors" and said she wanted a
divorce.
The Italian prime minister, 72, told the
Corriere della Sera that he did not think their marriage
could survive. Veronica Lario spoke out after her husband
attended the 18th birthday party of a friend's daughter. She
has also clashed with her husband over his choice of
inexperienced but attractive female election candidates.
"Veronica must apologise publicly - and I don't know if that
will be enough," Mr Berlusconi said in an interview with the
Italian daily newspaper. "It is the third time she has done
this to me in the middle of an election campaign. It's too
much," the billionaire prime minister said.
HEALTH &
SCIENCE
Seminal - Sen. Ben Nelson said that
he will oppose the creation of a government-run health
insurance plan as part of a health care overhaul, contrary
to the position held by many of his fellow Democrats.
Nelson, D-Neb., said he may try to assemble a coalition of
like-minded centrists opposed to the creation of a public
plan, as a counterweight to Democrats pushing for it. He
said he does not believe a majority of the Senate supports
the idea. . . Open Secrets says Nelson received $608,709
from the insurance industry in 2007-2008, making the
insurance industry his biggest donor group, more than
lawyers and even lobbyists.
Bio Ethics - The Scientist has
reported that Merck cooked up a phony, but real sounding,
peer reviewed journal and published favorably looking data
for its products in them. Merck paid Elsevier to publish
such a tome
INDICATORS
Reuters - The French spend more time
sleeping and eating than anyone else among the world's
wealthy nations, according to a study published on Monday.
The average French person sleeps almost nine hours every
night, more than an hour longer than the average Japanese
and Korean, who sleep the least in a survey of 18 members of
the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Despite their siesta habit, Spaniards rank only third in the
poll after Americans, who sleep more than 8.5 hours. And
while more and more French people grab a bite at fast-food
chains these days or wolf down a sandwich at their desk,
they still spend more than two hours a day eating.
REVIEW MAIN PAGE
FREE
EMAIL UPDATES
SEND US A
DONATION
ABOUT
THE REVIEW
NEW
ARTICLES
READERS' PICKS
ALSO OF
INTEREST
POCKET
PARADIGMS
ESSAY ARCHIVES
SAM SMITH'S
BIO
SAM SMITH'S BOOKS
SAM
SMITH'S MUSIC