Full Steam Ahead: "Shares Plus" and Afghanistan Exit
PM Press Conference 3 Sept 2012
By Mark P. Williams
Click for big version.
Today the Prime Minister laid out the government's response to the Waitangi Tribunal recommendations regarding the sale of shares in Mighty River Power. He said that the government will be offering shares in 49% of Mighty River Power between March and June 2013.
In a prepared statement he discussed
the Waitangi Tribunal's proposition of "Shares Plus" for
Maori Iwi affected by the sale and outlined the reasons why
the government does not believe that this is "necessary or
desirable". The Prime Minister gave five reasons for his
party's position:
- That it runs counter to the national
interest to give any one group of shareholders greater
rights;
- That almost every form of redress to Maori
could be achieved through other means and "Shares Plus" were
unnecessary;
- That "Shares Plus" was not a practical way
for a company to deal with its shareholders;
- The
"Shares Plus" idea might make the company less attractive to
prospective investors;
- The Treaty obligations of the
Crown are to be kept separate from the obligations of a
company to its shareholders.
He went on to state that the government believed very firmly that their legal position on the sale of shares was a strong one but would open up a consultation period for affected Iwi to raise any other concerns that the government may not have thought of.
The Prime Minister stated that the government's emphasis remained on getting the best possible price for the shares and said that he believed that "Shares Plus" was not the answer. He said that the government did not support the idea of a national Hui on water rights or a pan-Iwi solution to the issue. The Prime Minister said several times that the Waitangi Tribunal viewed this issue in local terms for the Iwi immediately concerned and the government was intending to address the question on local and not national terms. He stated that "within Maoridom there are a number of views on this issue -- there is not one voice" and therefore ruled out the idea of a national settlement.
The PM emphasised several times during the course of discussion that the Crown were prepared to accept any genuine claims of rights and interests but was careful to state that the government's opinion as to what these were might differ considerably from that of the Maori Party or the Waitangi Tribunal.
Questions relating to the Waitangi Tribunal Recommendations
• The PM was
asked whether the consultation period was a genuine
consultation, given that the government appeared to be
pressing ahead with its chosen course of action.
• The
PM was asked if he knew how likely it was that the
government would be taken to court over its
decision?
• The PM was asked whether the government
would be prepared to consider a co-governance model similar
to that in effect over the Waikato River.
• The PM
was asked what the costs of the delay were. He responded
that it would cost "some millions, more than five but less
than ten"
• The PM was then asked about whether this
would have any impact on the case of Rio Tinto and Meridian
regarding the Aluminium smelter. He said that this was a
matter for Rio Tinto.
• The PM was asked if he had
spoken directly to the Maori Party on the matter yet. He
responded that because of a "miscommunication" regarding
flight times he had not yet spoken directly to the Maori
Party.
Other Questions
• The PM was
asked whether the NZDF's earlier withdrawal date from
Afghanistan had anything to do with the recent casualties.
He said no, it was because of the up-grading of the runway
which would be used by NZ troop carriers to exit the country
which imposed a specific window for leaving.
• The
PM was asked how much the NZDF troops were likely to be at
risk of so called "green-on-blue" attacks by the Afghan
forces they were training. He responded that NZ troops were
less at risk from this because those they were working with
were Hazara, who are "not keen on the Taliban".
• The
PM was asked whether it was the case that the NZDF
considered it had done the job it set out to do or was just
leaving because it had spent ten years in Afghanistan and
everyone else was leaving. He responded that he felt the
NZDF had "absolutely" made a difference in Bamyan.
• On the subject of APEC the PM was asked whether it
was the case that New Zealand would undertake a free trade
agreement with Russia by the end of the year. He responded
that it was likely that New Zealand would have free trade
with several countries, including Taiwan and Russia by the
end of the year.
• The PM was asked whether he felt
there was any connection between rates of youth suicide and
economic background. He said that he felt there were
complex factors involved which needed to be addressed.
Click a link to play audio (or right-click to download) in either
MP3 format or in OGG format.
Click for big version.
Click for big version.
Click for big version.