New Zealand state’s quandary in the Asia-Pacific
New Zealand state’s quandary in the
Asia-Pacific
By Byron
Jared Phillips (reprinted from socialistvoice.org.nz)
In May, the US government brought criminal charges against five Chinese military officials for hacking into the systems of US energy and steel companies. They stole trade secrets and conducted economic espionage.
The Chinese government retaliated by urging domestic banks to remove high-end servers made by IBM and replace them with locally-made servers. Technology companies operating in China are now being vetted and state-owned companies have been instructed to cut ties with US consulting firms. These developments are examples of increased tensions between the US and China.
US-China tensions dominate
region
The Asia-Pacific region is one of the
main arenas where US-China tensions play out. A new order is
developing in East Asia after 40 years of relative
stability. In many ways the world is moving from being
‘unipolar’ to ‘bipolar’ for the first time since the
fall of the USSR in 1991.
China has seen huge economic
growth over the past 30 years. It experienced 10% annual
growth rates from 1985 to 2011. While China’s per capita
GDP is far behind the US, its overall GDP is gaining ground.
This gives China a significant amount of strategic and
political weight on the world stage.
At the same time the
position of the US in East Asia is in decline. Between 2000
and 2012, the US’s share of trade to East Asia fell from
19.5% to 9.5%. China’s share rose from 10% to 20% in the
same period. In 2009 US President Obama announced the
“Pivot to Asia” foreign policy, an attempt to check
China’s emergence as a challenger to US dominance in the
region.
Increased US-New Zealand military
cooperation
In mid-2012 the NZ and US
governments signed the Washington Declaration which set out
to achieve regular high-level dialogue and enhanced
cooperation between the two nations. In 2013 there was a
meeting of Pacific Army Chiefs which was co-chaired by New
Zealand and the US. Following this meeting the NZ Defence
Minister Jonathan Coleman and US Secretary of Defence Chuck
Hagel made a joint press release announcing further military
cooperation.
Coleman said “Our defence relationship
with the US is in great shape, and provides a strong
platform for working closely together in the future”. In
many ways US-NZ military relations are the strongest since
the ANZUS relationship ended in 1984.
The closer co-operation is not merely a result of a set of National Party policies. It stems from the needs of New Zealand business interests. New Zealand plays the role of a mini-imperialist force in the region attached to the US.
The New Zealand government began patching up relations with the US in the early 2000s. The Labour Party sought to straddle the US-Franco tensions but ultimately sided with US imperialism by making commitments to the so-called “War on Terror” in Afghanistan and Iraq. Labour’s election adverts in 2002 sought to promote this relationship with images of then US Secretary of State Colin Powell with a voice-over message saying that we are “very, very good friends”.
Up until this year National has civilianised military roles and cut military spending. However for 2014 National has allocated an increase of $100 million to military spending. This is part of an additional $535 million being allocated over the next four years, and has essentially been a restructure based on the needs of the US in the Asia-Pacific region.
NZ and China’s
strong economic links
The world economic crisis
has not had such a dramatic effect on New Zealand as it has
on other regions. This is because New Zealand’s economic
integration is strongest with Australia and China, whose
economies remained relatively stable for the first years of
the crisis.
There are more New Zealand companies with overseas production engagements in China than any other country. In 2013 China became New Zealand’s biggest export destination. This was the first time in decades that the biggest destination was not Australia. New Zealand’s next strongest links are with Australia, and the Australian economy is also intimately linked with China.
The Chinese economy has grown by around 7.5% over the last year. This is a slowdown on the 10% growth China had experienced for decades before the crisis began to take effect. With the slowdown, Chinese corporate debt has increased by up to 260% in the period between 2008 and 2013. Local government debt has also increased.
China is facing a crisis of overcapacity and its main export markets are struggling with low growth. This further drives China’s need to conquer new markets and exploit cheap resources in the region.
TPPA an attempt to strengthen US
influence
The Trans Pacific Partnership
Agreement (TPPA) did not initially include the US but the US
joined it and has sought to dominate the negotiations. From
the US Government’s perspective, the agreement is an
attempt to counter China’s emergence as a power in the
region.
The agreement would serve the interests of big corporations and empower them against states. It would establish trade tribunals to regulate disputes between companies and states. This would equate to bringing neo-liberal economic policies into law. A corporation could sue a state for introducing laws that undermine profits and violate the TPPA. Such measures would hamper the ability of working people to fight for reforms.
In the negotiations the US have often used heavy-handed tactics and this has caused other countries to hesitate to sign. The National government is currently trying to turn its own stalling to an advantage by saying it will not sign without the support of the population. However National has engaged undemocratically in the negotiations and the Labour Party has not opposed them. The truth is that National is currently recoiling because aspects of the US’s corporate agenda are at odds with aspects of New Zealand’s corporate agenda. This is just one of the dilemmas NZ big business faces.
Pacific Islands
While the
capitalist class is collaborating in order to advance its
interests, the left and workers’ movements must also seek
to build links between working people and the poor in the
region. The Pacific Islands will be of particular
importance.
The fight against climate change in New Zealand and other advanced economies must be intensified to help prevent further climate change displacement of the people on these islands. For those who have already been forced to flee, we must fight for their rights as refugees.
In some Pacific nations up to half the population rely on money sent from family members in New Zealand, Australia, and elsewhere. It is imperative that socialists and the workers’ movement play a leading role supporting full equal rights for Pacific workers.
Future struggle
The situation
in the Asia Pacific region is becoming more fraught. While
the New Zealand ruling class has hedged its bets with US
imperialism, the economy is also highly dependent the US’s
main imperialist rival, China. On the face of it, New
Zealand’s domestic situation appears relatively stable.
However, an analysis of the regional situation reveals that
there is much scope for destabilisation in the years
ahead.
It is clear that economic and political rivalries
will continue to sharpen in this part of the world. The only
way this can be resolved in a positive way is if working
people throughout the region unite their struggles and fight
for an alternative to the system that pits nations and
people against each other.
While democracy struggles in
places like Fiji and Tonga must be supported, we should
argue that only by transforming society along socialist
lines will we really be able to address the issues ordinary
people face. A socialist federation of the region would
promote cooperation and the democratic sharing of resources.
This is the alternative to oppression and imperialist
aggression.