Losing Losers and the Pentagon That Hires Them
Losing Losers and the Pentagon That Hires
Them
By David Swanson27 August, 2014
At the 200th anniversary of the jackasses of 1812 getting the U.S. capital burned by the British in 1814, I found myself watching a new film by Rory Kennedy called Last Days in Vietnam. This film covers the moment of loss, of defeat, of the U.S. military at long last receiving its final ass kicking by the Vietnamese, for whom these were not the last days of Vietnam but the last days of the American War and of Western military occupation.
As in the Middle East these days, where the United States has been busy losing wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and wrecking Libya and Pakistan and Yemen and Palestine on the side, Vietnam was a disaster by the time the movie begins. As the U.S. news media blames ISIS for the state of Iraq, Last Days in Vietnam blames the North Vietnamese. This is the story of the loss in Vietnam, but it is told primarily by the losers.
A Pentagon-funded online
celebration of the U.S. war on Vietnam
describes the incidents shown in this film thus:
"The
American evacuation ends. Saigon falls to the North
Vietnamese troops, and organized South Vietnamese resistance
to the communist forces ends. President Duong Van Minh
announces the unconditional surrender of the Republic of
Vietnam.”
I recommend Veterans For Peace for a counter to the
Pentagon's current $65 million campaign to glorify the U.S.
war on Vietnam. And I recommend watching Last Days in Vietnam for an
understanding of how wars end. In particular, this film
should be watched by anyone who has managed to continue
after all these decades to falsely associate war with
victory or winning or success or accomplishment.
The
final months of U.S. presence in Vietnam were a time of
denial, by the U.S. ambassador and others, that the North
Vietnamese were coming to kick them out. Every American and
every one of their Vietnamese allies and collaborators, and
all of the family members of both groups, could have been
safely evacuated. Instead, there was a last-minute mad rush
with helicopters dumped into the ocean after they unloaded
passengers onto ships, and many left behind to be
killed.
The film blames Congress for rejecting President Ford's request to fund an evacuation. But the Pentagon could quite easily have simply done it, and President Ford apparently never instructed the ambassador to do so. So, the spooky music plays, and the color of blood flows down the map from North to South as the barbaric communist aggressors who go so far as to use violence, something Americans would never do, approach Saigon. And they only come because President Nixon was driven out by the peaceniks. Never mind that that was several months earlier, they never would have come had Nixon been in the White House.
Of course, the views of the losers tend to obscure
as much as to reveal. The war had to end. The people
fighting for their homes had to prevail, sooner or later,
over the people fighting for the fact that they'd already
been fighting and couldn't face the shame of stopping. But
Last Days in Vietnam shows the Americans
watching the rushed evacuation from home, the Americans who
had earlier "served" in Vietnam. And they believed all their
efforts had "come to nothing."
Nothing? Nothing? Four
million men, women, and children slaughtered. The U.S.
society calls that nothing. The Germans are expected to
know how many millions their government killed. The
Japanese are required to study the past sins of Japan. But
the United States is supposed to gaze at its navel, glorify
its sinners, and pretend that its defeats are neutral,
indifferent, nothingness. Try telling that story about
Afghanistan or Iraq or Gaza, I dare
you.