Gambling Gain Should Be Approached With Caution
Gambling Gain Should Be Approached With Caution
A small 2.5% drop in annual gambling losses has been described as a positive sign, but still needs to be treated with “considerable caution” according to a national gambling issues lobby group.
GamblingWatch co-ordinator Dave Macpherson welcomed the reduction in pokie machine losses in bars and clubs – down from $1,027 million to $906 million, but pointed to “several factors in this reduction that need to be taken on board before we claim we’ve got this problem licked.”
• The $906 million lost still
represents a more than 50% increase on the pokie bar losses
in 2001, the year the Government first announced new laws to
curb unrestricted gambling
growth;
•
• Anti-smoking legislation during the
recent period has undoubtedly helped reduce the incidence of
gambling in bars, but it is too soon to tell whether this is
a temporary or permanent effect, and overseas experience
tells us that there is a ‘rebound’
effect;
•
• Other forms of gambling have all
increased and could represent future problem areas – in
particular an 18% increase in losses to the Lotteries
Commission, a Government agency that is aggressively trying
to increase its market share, and a continuing steady
increase in Casino losses, with the country’s six casinos
all targeting local residents in the areas they
operate.
•
Mr Macpherson said “the Department of
Internal Affairs, with their raft of responsible new
regulations introduced over the last two years, deserve
praise for the way they have taken on the pokie industry and
forced it to act more responsibly.”
“However that Department, and its Government masters, must not rest on their laurels as the overall gambling industry is powerful, well-funded and always looking for ways to increase its profitability, usually at the expense of problem gamblers and others who can least afford the losses.”
“Community disquiet at the unrestricted growth of gambling a few years ago forced the Government to bring in more responsible gambling rules, and will again push the Government if there is any sign of back-down on their part.”
Ends