New Zealand Centre for Political Research - www.nzcpr.com
NZCPR Weekly

Hi there,

I hope you and your family had a great Christmas and New Year and my sincere best wishes for 2008.

This first election year issue of NZCPR Weekly reflects on the election ahead, Mayor Tim Shadbolt, the NZCPR Guest Commentator, explains why he intends to breach the Electoral Finance Bill, and the weekly poll asks how much individual freedom means to you.

I invite you to check out our new-look NZCPR.com website and suggest that our world-media page with its live news feeds would make an excellent HOMEPAGE for you.

Election year is shaping up to be a big year for the NZCPR – if you would like to help support our efforts, please click here>>>.

Warmest regards,
Muriel

Looking Ahead

This first newsletter of election year is an opportune time to reflect on the sort of government we would like to see elected in 2008.

According to Abraham Lincoln, “Democracy is the government of the people, by the people, for the people”. This concept successfully built the greatest and most prosperous society of modern times.

In comparison the form of democracy Helen Clark and her cronies espouse is government of the people by the few, for the benefit of a few – because the elites in the Clark Government believe that that they know best.

The passing of Sue Bradford’s anti-smacking bill is a case in point. Had the issue had been put to a referendum, the public would have overwhelmingly voted to leave section 59 as it was.

The smacking ban is one of a raft of Labour laws that appear designed to turn us into a nation of compliant and obedient servants of the state. Criminals will be made of those who discipline the mischievous pre-schooler with a slap on the bottom, those who fail to microchip their miniature poodle, or heaven forbid, those who dare criticise Helen Clark’s regime during election year.

In passing the Electoral Finance Bill, Labour and her companions have misjudged and underestimated New Zealanders. They not only ignored the view of the public and the media, but that of the Human Rights Commission, the Electoral Commission, the Law Society and a host of other influential bodies. It marks an historic low point in New Zealand politics when the government of the day blatantly put self interest and the pursuit of power ahead of governing for the good of the people.

There has never been any justification to suppress free speech in a democracy and nor is there now. The censorship regime imposed as from 1 January this year is harsher and more sinister than any in the democratic world.

A number of people have publicly stated that they intend to thumb their nose at this vengeful law. Leading that charge is this week’s NZCPR Guest Commentator, Tim Shadbolt, the Mayor of Invercargill. He has warned the government that he would campaign against them if they carried out their plan to cut the funding to the Southern Institute of Technology. He says:

“In my view one of the most offensive aspects of the Electoral Finance Act is that it includes the entire year of an election starting on 1 January. It prevents us from stating quite simply that ‘this government has really hurt Invercargill, so let’s change the government’. My next move, in late January, is to publish the full story on SIT and tertiary funding and then add a ‘Vote National’ recommendation at the end. I intend deliberately breaking the Electoral Finance Act and will fight it out in court”. To read Tim’s Guest Commentary click the sidebar link>>>

While the anti-smacking law and the election year gagging law generated a great deal of high profile debate, a large number of the damaging changes imposed by Labour and its support parties have gone under the radar of public scrutiny.

Labour’s so-called health reforms have led to systemic failure across the health sector with sick patients unable to gain access to hospital waiting lists, maternity services in chaos, a dangerous shortage of doctors, and the effective nationalisation of GP’s practices.

Changes in the early childhood sector have resulted in a critical shortage of childcare places in many areas.

Problems within the education sector continue unabated and the new school curriculum will only make things worse.

In spite of having every opportunity to tackle the critical problem of entrenched welfare dependency, Labour has failed to do so, even though the experience of other countries shows that given good policy options such underclass families are quite capable of completely turning around their lives in order to give their children the chance of a decent future. Meanwhile, another welfare policy failure is resulting in an escalation in the number of people claiming the non-work tested Sickness and Invalid Benefits from 90,000 in 2001 to almost 130,000 today.

Protecting the public from crime has always been regarded as a core role of government, yet during the three terms that Labour has been in office, violent crime has continued to rise unabated. The public’s call for tougher sentences remains largely ignored.

With their “we know best” driving mentality, Labour has dramatically expanded the size and scope of the public service going from 29,000 employees when they first came to office to 44,500 today. That explains the outpouring of new regulations – over two thousand affecting the business sector alone – and their ad hoc meddling in many areas that should be left to the public, business and the market.

Labour’s three-term track record is one of over-taxing, over-spending and over-regulating. In spite of imposing massive inflationary cost increases on the economy as a result, the government has steadfastly refused to either reduce income tax rates to compensate or to adjust tax thresholds.

This is a defining issue. When Labour increased the top tax rate to 39 percent they promised that it would only affect the top 5 percent of taxpayers. But they did not index the thresholds. That means that due to “bracket creep”, some 14 percent of income earners now pay the top rate of tax instead of the promised 5 percent. The fact that Labour has steadfastly refused to rectify this shows they cannot be trusted.

New Zealand is now the highest-taxed non-European nation in the OECD. We pay 38 percent of our Gross Domestic Product in taxation, compared with 31 percent in Australia. This helps to explain why 700 people a week are leaving New Zealand to seek a better opportunity across the Tasman.

It was President Ronald Reagan who said: “We who live in free market societies believe that growth, prosperity and ultimately human fulfillment, are created from the bottom up, not the government down. Only when the human spirit is allowed to invent and create, only when individuals are given a personal stake in deciding economic policies and benefitting from their success - only then can societies remain economically alive, dynamic, progressive, and free. Trust the people. This is the one irrefutable lesson of the entire postwar period contradicting the notion that rigid government controls are essential to economic development”.

Contrast those words with what we have in New Zealand today and one appreciates how far we as a country have strayed.

2008 is of course an election year and with that a return of voter sovereignty (albeit it for only one day in three years). This is a chance for our society to reflect on what democracy means to us, and decide whether we want a society built on freedom of the individual or servility to the state.

NZCPR POLL

The Poll this week asks:
Will the protection of individual freedom influence the way you vote in this year’s general election? To vote please click here>>>

To read readers' comments on this newsletter and poll - updated daily - please click here>>> .
Click to view all previous poll results and all previous poll comments.

NZCPR ADMIN

Please forward this newsletter on to others who you think would be interested. We would like to increase the circulation this year as much as we can.

To join the mailing list for this free newsletter please click here>>>

Why not submit your burning issue for publication on our website Soapbox Series?

If you enjoy political debate why not bookmark our Debating Chamber forum? Many of our forum subscribers post up information for the public to view daily.

To contact Muriel about this week’s column please click here>>>. You can reach Muriel by phone on 09-434-3836, 021-800-111 or post at PO Box 402055 Tutukaka, Whangarei.

NZCPR Weekly is a free weekly periodical from the New Zealand Centre for Political Research, a web-based think tank at www.nzcpr.com.

If you have a change of address, please note your old address and your new one and click here>>>. To unsubscribe, please click here>>> and send.
(Please note - if you get back a message saying the address is not on the mailing list, it means you are subscribed under a different address and you will need to submit that one)
NZCPR
Commentary

INVERCARGILL
City of 'Hands on Tools'
not 'Bums on Seats'
Tim Shadbolt

For 30 years we were the fastest declining city in New Zealand or Australia. No government delegation turned up on our doorstep claiming ‘this was outrageous and we will save you’. A school review announced that we were dying and half our schools would be closed, but otherwise nothing special was done to help us.
At the end of the day we realised there would be no cavalry and we would have to save ourselves.
To read click here>>>

Click to subscribe to NBR
FREE ALERTS>>>

NZCPR UPDATE
WORLD MEDIA
Read world headlines from the New York Times, Australian, updated with live links - why not make it your HOMEPAGE? >>>

SMACKING IN SWEDEN
Translated report from Swedish lawyer Ruby Harrold-Claesson on court cases against parents >>>

NZCPR HOMEPAGE
Why not check out the new-look NZCPR website HOMEPAGE >>>

NZCPR ARCHIVES
Can't find a newsletter? View all our NZCPR articles now arranged by subject order >>>

MID WEEK POLITICS
New on the www.nzcpr.com website each Wednesday

ENDS

© Scoop Media