NZCPR Weekly - One in Six
The Debating Chamber Forum Index New Zealand Centre for Political Research - www.nzcpr.com
NZCPR Weekly - One in Six
In this issue, NZCPR Weekly reflects on why one in six Maori live in Australia, Guest Commentator Kelly Te Heuheu, Maori Crime Specialist for the Sensible Sentencing Trust, describes the destructive effects of Maori tribalism, and the weekly poll asks NZCPR readers whether the abolition of the Maori seats would make a difference to the country.
On Tuesday international "race relations day" - a day to promote the elimination of racial discrimination - will be celebrated by schools from all over the country.
In New
Zealand, the foundation for racial equality was laid with
the Treaty of Waitangi. Under Article One of the Treaty,
Maori ceded their sovereignty to the Queen. Under Article
Two, property rights were established. And under Article
Three, all New Zealanders were given equality under British
Law. (An excellent analysis of the Treaty of Waitangi by Hon
Sir Apirana Ngata is available exclusively through the NZCPR
It remains a
puzzle, however, that in a country where it is unlawful to
discriminate on the basis of race, racism is being actively
encouraged by the government. Racial discrimination by the
state has fuelled deep divisions within New Zealand society.
The existence of the Maori seats exacerbates the problem.
According to the Electoral Commission, when the 1985
Royal Commission on the Electoral System considered the
future of the Maori seats, it concluded that "the seats had
not helped Maori and that they would achieve better
representation through a proportional party-list system".
The Commission therefore recommended that if MMP was
adopted, "the Maori seats should be abolished".
Nowadays,
as they predicted, Maori representation in Parliament has
increased through the party-list system. As a result a
majority of New Zealanders now believe that the Maori seats
are redundant and should be abolished. The National Party
recently announced that it would tie the abolition of the
Maori seats to the conclusion of the Waitangi Treaty claims
process in 2014. That brought a predictable response from
the Maori Party - which depends on the Maori seats for its
survival. Hone Harawira warned that a promise to abolish the
Maori seats could compromise post-election arrangements:
"We won't be doing deals with parties who plan to silence
our peoples' views. It took us 150 years for our voice to be
heard in the halls of power, and our people won't stand for
anyone trying to take it away again. Political parties may
be pushing for deadlines on lodging claims, but they
shouldn't for one minute think that settling claims for less
than 3% of their value means that Maori will accept having
their independent voice in parliament choked off at the same
time". It is these increasing demands by radical Maori
that have fuelled the racial divide. Tribalism is a
primitive culture that modern societies have shunned. A
recent study by Paul Hamer for Te Puni Kokiri, highlights
this fact. Back in 1966, one in fifty Maori lived in
Australia. Today it is one in six! Increasing numbers of
Maori are leaving New Zealand for Australia, not only to
take advantage of the opportunities provided by higher
living standards and a more buoyant economy, but to also
escape the negative effects of racism and tribalism. (To
read the "Maori in Australia" report, click here
In his report
Paul Hamer describes how many Maori in Australia welcome
being regarded as "Kiwis" - 'New Zealanders' first and Maori
second. Many expressed their overwhelming sense of relief of
being "free of Maori culture", of being able to "get away
from the rigid beliefs of our elders", of being "away from
tikanga Maori and whanau dynamics or pressures associated
with being whanau". Others spoke of being able to escape
the whanau environment after years of being in it, living
it, breathing it, eating it, without even realising it: "you
know the story marae, whanau hui, whanau politics,
continuously fighting each other but still whanau in the
end". Kelly Te Heuheu, the National Maori Crime Issues
Specialist for the Sensible Sentencing Trust, is this week's
NZCPR Guest commentator. In her opinion piece "Grief, Pain &
Division of our People over Maori Land and Tribal Politics",
Kelly shares a similar experience: "Since early
childhood, I remember the punch-ups and arguments between
our people over land and tribal politics. The worst issue
with Maori Land is most of it is in multiple ownership which
is disastrous. For the children playing around the Marae we
got used to this fighting as the norm of our lifestyle. Many
of our people moved away from home due to friction and
fighting. Families broke up, the feud lasted for many years
- sometimes a lifetime". She explains, "Even worse,
animosity goes down through generations like a plague.
Grief, pain and division between whanau (family), hapu (sub
tribe) and iwi (tribe) over land and tribal politics is so
bad that many of our people distance themselves from our
culture". (To read Kelly's article click the sidebar
link>>>) This need to distance themselves from Maori
culture is clearly a factor in driving many Maori to
Australia. One survey respondent put it this way: "It is
paramount that the New Zealand government begins to
recognise that Maori are achieving and are successful when
living away from New Zealand, and they have to begin asking
themselves why is this not happening in New Zealand? To
oppress a people and manipulate politics to achieve their
own means will only see more and more Maori recognising that
they do have a future and they can be successful and live in
a flash house, and drive a flash car, and have a healthy
bank account and still retain their Maoriness -
unfortunately they have to leave New Zealand to do it".
It is a sad fact that while most Maori do very well in
Australia, government policy at home keeps Maori down.
Running a country with economic policies that reduce living
standards, means that many families will never enjoy the
benefits of a decent income. Having an education system that
forces children to go to failing state schools, means that
many children from poor families totally miss out on the
benefits of a good education. Keeping families dependent on
welfare, robs hope, and results in many turning to booze,
drugs and crime. New Zealanders should not have to live
under laws that foster failure. Nor should we - Maori and
non-Maori - have to live under laws that foster racism. The
vast majority of New Zealanders want laws that treat us
equally and treat us well - laws that allow us all to
succeed and prosper. Tribalism and separatism do not do
that. I will leave the last word to Alan Duff, from an
article "Maori Underperformance" that he wrote for the NZCPR
last year: To continue with the collective, whanau, hapu,
iwi societal model is a fatal mistake. A fatal mistake. For
in not developing individuality we continue down the
declining slope of anonymity in a collective. Of no-one
willing to make decisions - especially unpopular decisions -
for fear of standing out from the crowd, going against the
collective will. Individuality is as fundamental to a
society's development as property rights. The quality of
debate in this country on Maori issues is poor, cowardly,
non-analytical, and none of it serves the Maori people well.
You see we're having thrust upon us, rammed down our throats
in fact, this "Maori as we were" model (before, it is
implied, the Europeans came along and ruined us morally and
culturally). Its advocates are insisting that we think
differently - yes, we do, but it shouldn't be assumed we
can't change, not if the same thinking is holding us back
from advancing - we have a different world view, we have
greater difficulties adapting to Western culture. So just
give us the money and we'll figure out the solutions to our
own problems. When demonstrably we can't. Why not? Because
our base line is a Stone Age societal model which patently
does not work in this modern world. When are we as a nation,
starting with government, going to say "enough is enough."?
(click to view The
poll this week asks whether you think the abolition of the
Maori seats would make New Zealand a better place to live, a
worse place to live, or would make no difference.
ENDS