ACC Must Revisit Surgery Funding Decisions
ACC Must Revisit Surgery Funding Decisions
Last
week ACC released the findings of its internal review into
decision-making regarding funding surgery. The report
revealed that in the nine months to March; 44 per cent of
the ACC decisions declining to fund surgery challenged
through the independent review process were overturned in
favour the claimant, compared with average of 25% for all
decisions for the same period. The general manager of claims
management, Denise Cosgrove, said ACC was implementing
recommendations from the review report which were expected
to make improvements for claimants.
Access Support
Services, an organisation representing claimants in the
review process, first raised concerns about ACC's approach
to decision-making in this area as far back as 2009. Back
then it began experiencing an unprecedented number of
claimants wanting to challenge ACC's surgery funding
decisions and, as a result, a significant majority of these
cases were overturned in their clients' favour.
Access
Support Services accepts not all of ACC's decisions
declining to fund surgery will be wrong. But the fact nearly
half of those challenged through the independent review
process over the last year were found to be wrong supports
what it has been claiming for the last two years. Often
these decisions mean ACC does not accept liability for the
claimant's condition; which affects eligibility to other
entitlements, such as weekly compensation, rehabilitation
and lump sum compensation.
Access Support Services'
position is that ACC must now
write to those claimants
who were declined surgery funding since 2009, but not
challenged through the disputes process, and offer to
revisit their claims and issue a new decision, with review
rights.
"Our view is that anything less than offering
to revisit those decisions will demonstrate ACC is being
duplicitous in saying it will be undertaking to make
improvements" says Mr Wadsworth, head of Access Support
Services. "I will be writing to ACC and requesting they
address this matter to ensure those claimants affected have
not been unfairly disadvantaged by its overzealous
policy."
ENDS.
.