Minister Quick to Attack Anti-1080 Community
Minister Quick to Attack Anti-1080 Community
The Graf Boys
Clyde Graf
Hon Kate Wilkinson was quick to seize the opportunity to infer that those opposed to 1080 were part of a growing "anti-1080 movement" which she suggests is becoming increasingly violent on the Coromandel Peninsula.
Ms. Wilkinson was referring to a reported assault that took place at a marine protection meeting in Tairua on the weekend.
The incident was an act of aggression, and in no way reflects the behavior of the majority of those who oppose the use of 1080 poison to kill wildlife in New Zealand.
However, a person who was present at the meeting said the assault was different to the perspective offered by the Minister of Conservation. The person stated that the dispute had been brewing for several years, and was over the killing of 9 pig-hunters' dogs shot by the Waikato Conservation Board Chairman, Arthur Hinds. Whether you agree with shooting dogs or not, this is an emotive issue, and was what was behind the assault, the informant stated.
Perhaps a better way to have commented on the incident was to simply condemn the assault on the respected member of the community, and then allow the Police to handle the incident..
But this is not the first time the pro-1080 lobby have taken advantage of an opportunity to paint people opposed to1080, in a bad light. In 2008 a 1080 contractor's dog was allegedly poisoned by "anti-1080 protestors". However, after the police report was completed, many months later, it was found that a likely cause of the dog's death was the dog coming into contact with traces of 1080 poison lying in the back of the contractor's vehicle.
It is
understandable that DoC wishes to stem the growing number of
people in the community opposed to the use of 1080 poison,
but this is not the way to do it.
What happened on the
weekend was an assault by an individual, and it will be
dealt with by the police. To turn this into an opportunity
to try to brand those who oppose 1080 as part of an
increasingly violent "anti-1080 movement", is offensive, and
provocative.
The way in which 1080 is used is certainly
emotive, and so it should be - it takes animals from hours
to days to die from the effects of the poison. To watch your
pet die is one of the most horrific event someone could
wittiness.
To have poison dropped around your property,
and have your water supplies threatened with poison, is very
emotive.
People are tired of having their pets poisoned,
and their health threatened, at the same time as being told
that it's for the greater good!
It's time to stop the
anti-social practice of aerially spreading 1080, and to use
more targeted options of pest control - It's time to
consider not only the welfare of the wildlife, but also the
communities and the people that live around them.
ENDS.