Cannabis – low/moderate risk to public health
MEDIA RELEASE – 26/9/11
Cannabis – low/moderate
risk to public health
A response to Don Brash’s
statement in the media that cannabis is safe and should be
legalised
“We welcome Don Brash’s call for a
change in our cannabis laws” said Professor Doug Sellman,
Director of the National Addiction Centre, “but no
psychoactive recreational drug is completely safe.”
“We should be talking in terms of levels of risk
rather than categorical safety or not”
“Compared
with alcohol, which has been demonstrated to be a Class B
equivalent drug ie high risk to public health, cannabis is
estimated to be of low/moderate risk to public
health”.
“There are four main risks associated
with frequent heavy cannabis use as follows:
1. chronic respiratory illness, including lung cancer associated with smoking the drug;
2. injury and death from driving under the influence of cannabis, but less than with alcohol intoxication;
3. increased psychotic symptoms, which is clinically relevant in less than 1% of the population; and
4. a negative impact on learning, particularly relevant for adolescents who are at that critical stage of life when both formal school education as well as complex social learning set a life course for the individual within society.”
“Low-risk cannabis use for adults, which
is using cannabis at a level associated with a one in a
hundred chance of dying from a cannabis-related event has
never been scientifically validated as far as I know”,
said Prof Sellman. “This is one of the problems of having
the drug prohibited and yet used by thousands of New
Zealanders on a relatively frequent basis”.
“However, an educated guess based on low-risk
tobacco smoking and low-risk drinking guidelines can be
made; everything else being equal, it would probably be
smoking cannabis about once a week or less”.
“The
recent Law Commission Review of the Misuse of Drugs Act has
encouraged public discussion about drugs from a health
perspective rather than just as a criminal justice issue,
and to use scientific evidence to guide policy making rather
than perpetuating drug use as a moral issue”.
ends