Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Taranaki Coast: Extended set net ban a knee jerk reaction

3 February, 2012

Call to extend set net ban off Taranaki Coast a knee jerk reaction

Any extension of the set net ban off the Taranaki coast is an extreme response and does not consider the full facts around the issue, says the New Zealand Seafood Industry Council.

“While any fishing related death of marine mammals is regrettable, it is extreme and irresponsible for conservationists to call for an extension of the set net ban, especially when the identity of the dolphin cannot be categorically confirmed, and there is a need for more research,” says Peter Bodeker, Chief Executive of the New Zealand Seafood Industry Council.

The fisherman who caught the dolphin (outside the restricted zone) identified and reported it to MAF as a Hector’s dolphin which is near identical to the Maui’s subspecies, and with a population of more than 7000.

MAF in its release on the issue stated that the dolphin caught was ‘likely a Maui’s dolphin’.

“Unfortunately, the word ‘likely’ has been removed from the conservationists’ arguments and that’s a key omission given how sensitive this issue is,” says Mr Bodeker.

Mr Bodeker also said that more research is needed rather than knee jerk reactions based on lack of solid evidence.

“Not only do we need to be able to bring the animal back to shore to determine the species definitively (currently under the Marine Mammals Protection Act all marine mammals must be returned to sea), we also need to do more research on the dolphins that occasionally occur off Taranaki, as recent Department of Conservation research has demonstrated that there is not a clear separation between the areas inhabited by the two subspecies.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

“Environmental sustainability is obviously important to New Zealanders but equally we need a balanced debate that considers a number of factors including environmental impacts, based on good science; the impact on our local communities, the fishermen and families and associated businesses, and the social and economic benefits that come with providing a high quality food source,” says Mr Bodeker.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.