Focus Should Be Right to Care, Not Right To Die
Focus Should Be Right to Care, Not Right To Die
Family First NZ says that any bill to
decriminalise euthanasia would lead to disabled, sick and
elderly people coming to be viewed as a burden upon the
taxpayer, society and their families – and that it would
send a dangerous message to young people about suicide and
the value of life.
“A Sunday Star Times
poll is trying to suggest that there is support for a
law change – but hard and exceptional cases result in bad
lawmaking, and this poll is inconsistent with other more
independent and reliable polls,” says Bob McCoskrie,
National Director of Family First NZ.
“We should
be focusing on making quality palliative and social care
available – not promoting killing as an easy solution to a
complex situation. In a culture of euthanasia, disabled,
sick, socially disadvantaged, and elderly people come to be
viewed as a burden upon the taxpayer, society and their
families.”
“This is not a ‘rights’ issue.
This is a medical debate and how we better care for the weak
and vulnerable in our society,” says Mr
McCoskrie.
“The safeguards which are suggested
may sound good, but international experience has shown that
they often don’t become reality. Despite written consent
laws in Netherlands and Belgium, up to a 1/3’rd of
euthanasia cases were carried out without request or
consent. Despite mandatory reporting requirements, in
Belgium, nearly half of all cases aren’t reported. In the
Netherlands, at least 20 per cent of all cases aren’t
reported.”
“There is also huge concern about
the slippery slope effect. Why deny euthanasia to a patient
who was suffering but who was not terminally ill, such as
someone with severe arthritis? Why deny euthanasia to people
who were not sick but who wanted to die for other reasons,
such as the loss of a beloved spouse, or animal, or because
of long-term unemployment? Or an unhappy teenager who is
simply unhappy with their life? This is the exact opposite
message to that which governments, educators, therapists and
social workers are trying to reinforce.
In England
in 2006, over 70 percent of members of the Royal College of
Physicians (and over 95 percent of those in the specialty of
palliative medicine) agreed with the following statement:
“With improvements in palliative care, good
clinical care can be provided within existing legislation
and ...patients can die with dignity. A change in
legislation is not needed.”
“The sick and
dying deserve care and protection – not an underlying
message that euthanasia will fix everything,” says Bob
McCoskrie
ENDS