Minister of Health turns his back on crucial issues
Website: www.democrats.org.nz
Media Release
Wednesday 11 July 2012
Minister of Health turns his back on
crucial issues
“Serious patient
safety concerns being raised with Tony Ryall have resulted
in the Minister issuing a denial that he is in any way
responsible for such matters” said Democrats for Social
Credit health spokesman David
Tranter.
“Following extensive concerns
raised by health professionals employed by the West Coast
DHB I wrote to Tony Ryall backing those concerns and
detailing some of my own negative experiences in trying to
raise issues with Coast DHB management” Mr. Tranter said.
“The Minister’s sole response (attachment to this email) is to ignore every issue raised and stating that, “The matters you raise about West Coast DHB are internal issues for the DHB……As Minister of Health, it is inappropriate for me to intervene in such issues. You may wish to contact the DHB directly with your concerns.
“Given that my letter (attached below) made it
clear that health professionals such as former long-term
anaesthetist Judy Forbes, and myself as a former board
member had tried to raise concerns with the DHB Mr. Ryall
knows full well that telling me to contact the DHB
“directly” is utterly futile and is no more than a
cowardly cop-out by him. As I informed Mr. Ryall Judy Forbes
as an internationally respected health professional is
willing to discuss these matters with him but his dismissive
response indicates that he simply doesn’t want to
know.
“It is a tragic indictment of the attitude of
the Minister to his portfolio that despite a long - and
continuing - history of safety concerns raised by West Coast
DHB health professionals Mr. Ryall continues to evade these
crucial issues” Mr. Tranter concluded.
……………………………….....
Letter sent to Tony Ryall;
31.5.12.
Dear Mr. Ryall,
I have
attached below my recent letter sent to you at Parliament
and which received the standard response that it would be
referred to Ministry officials - which, as we both know,
means a cursory glance and another standard response at a
later date.
Having been involved in health issues from
the community point of view for over 20 years - especially
on the West Coast - I appeal to you to read my letter and to
take some action before the Coast loses any more very
professional and experienced staff through un-caring,
incompetent management. I also attach (following in red) the
latest of messages I continue to receive from people well
placed to know what is going on behind the scenes in the
WCDHB - and which has been very much the norm for many
years. I emphasise that this is one of many such
communications from different people and which paint a
consistent picture of the management attitude towards health
professionals on the Coast.
Yours sincerely,
David
Tranter.
1. Two staff members have been made redundant in the 2011/12 financial year, only for similar positions that they would have been able to be redeployed to being advertised in a short period of time after they were paid out. This is against the DHB internal policy & must breach employment law.
2. Redundancy payments have also been paid to staff who have had job offers at other places, to encourage them to accept the jobs.
3. Reports of bullying from the CEO yelling at and belittling senior staff, senior staff yelling at and threatening the job security of their staff and a bullying culture creating a situation where staff are too scared to take sick leave have gone uninvestigated.
4. Workplace injuries have gone uninvestigated and serious injuries have not been reported to the Department of Labour.
Given the current bullying climate at the DHB please excuse my nom de-plume, I am a current employee and have witnessed several of the incidents of bullying, including the bullying of staff members who have reported incidents.
………………………………........
Dear Mr.
Ryall
Since first getting involved in New Zealand
health issues in 1991, particularly concerning rural
matters, I have seen the disastrous results of what began as
Simon Upton’s health-as-a-business approach and which has
been continued via the subsequent corporate management
regime under successive governments.
Central to the
changes is the way in which medical people’s views of how
hospitals, to take one example, should be run as their
practical knowledge has been supplanted by the host of
inappropriately qualified and experienced managers who have
taken control.
I know this from having spoken to many
well-informed health professionals over the intervening
years - some of whom still communicate with me regarding
their on-going concerns with the current management
systems.
Of course there are exceptions amongst
management but generally speaking the clear message
repeatedly conveyed to me by health professionals is that
management respect for health professionals’ views and
knowledge has been largely lost.
I now refer to the
West Coast health system which I first became involved in
around 1995. During this time I have observed, twice as an
elected member of the DHB board there, the breakdown of
cooperation between the corporate management approach and
health professionals. I have seen a succession of highly
experienced and very capable health professionals treated
with contempt by so-called managers lacking all
understanding of the ethical basis upon which dedicated
health professionals act. I recall in the early 1990s when
highly respected Dunedin Mike Hunter apologised to the
public in the Otago Daily Times for leaving the public
system and going into the private sector because, as he
said, he could not do his job properly under the public
system management. I also recall a long-serving Oamaru
Hospital nurse writing to me saying that 17 public hospital
nurses who were not re-applying for their jobs were
“great” nurses who could not bring themselves to work
under the new management regime. This has gone on ever since
as evidenced by my own experience and by my network of
health contacts around New Zealand.
The corporate management approach was, for me, most appallingly illustrated by West Coast management’s treatment of an outstanding and hugely experienced and versatile anaesthetist, Judy Forbes, who worked for over 20 years at Grey Hospital and who is welcomed with open arms wherever she works around the world - including voluntary service in war zones and in Third World countries. Here is a professional whose dedication and expertise cannot be questioned, yet when she attempted to raise serious safety concerns at Grey Hospital in 2008 her approaches to management were treated with utter contempt by a CEO - one Kevin Hague - who had no relevant experience whatsoever of running such a thing as a public Hospital. And just to complete the ludicrous response to her concerns when this was brought to the attention of the then DHB chair, one Rex Williams (who admitted to the board when government appointed him that he knew nothing about health - but he did know about the manufacture of cement!) he gave Judy Forbes three minutes to address the board - an obviously ludicrous amount of time to explain very serious and complex issues. When this was over Mr. Williams made it obvious he had nothing but contempt for her views with the result that she has never worked at Grey Hospital again. I should add that another experienced and long-serving anaesthetist also resigned from Grey Hospital at the same time. Clearly, Mr. Williams regarded Kevin Hague’s views as the be-all and end-all of the matter - a clear case of the blind leading the blind.
This was possibly the worst such case I
know of but there is a long history on the Coast of health
professionals personally known to me, both in the mental
health field and general health care who have raised safety
and other care concerns and who have subsequently been so
appallingly treated by management that they left the Coast
whether of their own choice or by being effectively
sacked.
As another example of WCDHB management
attitudes towards innovative health professionals I cite the
case of Dr. Buzz Burrell who was, for many years, the G.P.
who ran Reefton Hospital and G.P. clinic. Dr. Burrell
devised a scheme for streamlining management of the Reefton
service which would not only improve the service but would
save enough money to provide free patient care to everyone
in the Reefton/Inangahua District. I know it was feasible
because I carefully studied a copy of the plan and could not
find any fault with it - it would have worked. But by
showing that a very busy G.P. could come up with such a
scheme it would have highlighted the inability of management
to devise such a scheme - so management simply rejected
it.
In writing this I have no vested interest. I
continue as the NZ Democrats’ health spokesman but in
doing so from Australia I obviously have no political
ambitions.
I have never worked in the health sector
but having been deeply involved from the community point of
view for over 20 years I believe I have a deep understanding
of the changes in that time. I would also advise you that
when I was advocate for a Christchurch patient I met Gordon
Davies as Canterbury ceo and without any prompting from me
he told me that when he was with the Ministry West Coast
management were the “worst” they had to deal with in all
New Zealand.
As just one example of my personal
experiences with Greymouth management, being known as
supportive of people with mental health problems one day I
received a phone call from a very desperate-sounding woman
who lived in a rural area in the Grey District and who said
she could not get any mental health assistance. I rang the
DHB mental health office and explained the situation. who
told me I had to ring the mental health manager, Hecta
Williams. I did so and got a recorded message (it was during
office hours) so I left a message and rang around some
contacts to see if I could get assistance (we are, after
all, told that all mental health-related calls for help must
be taken seriously and acted on urgently). After several
calls I managed to get a district nurse to talk to the woman
who had called me and I gather that she managed to calm
matters. Next day, 17 hours after my urgent message was left
on Hecta Williams’ phone she rang me and actually
reprimanded me for not ringing the mental health emergency
number - to which I replied that I didn’t know it and that
the mental health office hadn‘t mentioned it. Her response
was to tell me the number was published in the local paper.
Her entire attitude was aggressively critical of me - for
seeking help for a mental health patient!
I appeal to
you as Minister of Health to look beyond the sort of
carefully orchestrated visits I know have been arranged for
your benefit when you have visited the West Coast.
Judy
Forbes is willing to talk to you about these issues.
I
am also willing to discuss these matters, albeit by
email.
Yours sincerely,
David
Tranter.
ENDS