Chris Kahui Should Be Charged For Negligent Parenting
Chris Kahui Should Be Charged For Negligent Parenting
Family First NZ believes that Chris
Kahui should be charged for ‘negligent parenting’ and is
questioning why the police are not willing to pursue a
prosecution.
“It is quite clear from the
Coroner’s report that the actions, or more correctly, the
inaction of Chris Kahui had an adverse effect on the timing
of urgent treatment which the babies needed,” says Bob
McCoskrie, National Director of Family First NZ. “The
Coroner’s report says that medical evidence shows the
babies could have been saved if taken to hospital
earlier.”
“We would argue that the police
should be seeking to charge Mr Kahui under s152 crimes act
– a parent failing to provide necessaries and protect from
injury.”
“There were a number of actions which
a reasonable parent would have taken in the circumstances.
The family were advising Chris to take the babies to
hospital because of their presenting conditions and
Chris’s sister was heading there anyway – but he
refused. The Coroner found he hid the details of how
unresponsive the twins had been and their feeding patterns
and wellbeing when their mother returned
home.”
“And when the doctor told the parents to
urgently take the children to hospital, Mr Kahui deserted
his partner and went home and played playstation while his
children were fighting for their lives,” says Mr
McCoskrie.
“It seems clear that Chris Kahui
failed as a caregiver on decisions which were life and death
decisions, and he should be held accountable for
them.”
152 Duty of parent or guardian to provide
necessaries and protect from
injury
· Every one who is a
parent, or is a person in place of a parent, who has actual
care or charge of a child under the age of 18 years is under
a legal duty—
· (a) to provide that
child with necessaries; and
· (b) to take
reasonable steps to protect that child from
injury
ENDS