Weak sentence for depraved father slammed
Media Release 5 June 2013
Weak sentence for depraved father slammed
The child advocacy group,
Stop Demand Foundation, has slammed today’s sentence of a
father convicted of a range of sexual charges against his
then 13-month old son.
The 27-year old father of the
infant was sentenced in the Oamaru District Court this
afternoon to eight years 10 months imprisonment, with a
minimum non-parole period of five years.
Stop
Demand’s founder, Denise Ritchie, says she is baffled and,
quite frankly, furious at the weak sentence handed down by
Judge Joanna Maze. Ritchie says, “This man sexually
violated his 13-month old son, an offence that is heinous in
the extreme, and which attracts up to 20 years imprisonment.
This father then sold, for $500, the use of his son for the
purpose of sexual violation, to Kiwi paedophile Aaron John
Ellmers who was sentenced last month to preventive detention
for a minimum period of 20 years. Adding to these
atrocities, the father recorded the violations of his son,
to distribute for the sexual pleasure of other sexual
predators. As he reaches young adulthood his son will
realise that for his entire lifetime and beyond, countless
men will continue to masturbate to and enjoy his rapes by
his dad in cyberspace – a discovery that for many such
victims is psychologically crippling.”
“If those
offences weren’t horrific enough, the offender’s desire
to exchange his pictures and videos for photos of sexual
offending against young girls will directly fuel a demand
for images that require young girls to be raped; he is
therefore directly fuelling the rape of young girls.
Frankly, sexual crimes against children don’t get any
worse than this. These are a series of crimes for which
this man should have been sent to prison for 18-20 years
with a minimum non-parole period of 15 years, not
five.”
Denise Ritchie says, “What more does Judge
Joanna Maze expect an infant to endure at the hands of a
biological parent before she would consider a penalty at the
top end? There are two issues about which Stop Demand is
furious: the paltry penalty, and the fact that we have such
disconnected judges that spout weasel words about
‘profound effect on a child’ and then dish out weak
penalties that in no way reflect the gravity of the crimes.
This 13-month old was failed by his
‘apology-for-a-father’ and he has been failed again by
Judge Maze and the legal system.”
Stop Demand points
to New Zealand’s shocking record of child sex abuse and
incest. It says as long as we have judges like Judge Maze
dishing out trivialising sentences, we have little hope of
turning this national scourge
around.
ends