409 Objections to Proposed Electorate Boundaries
MEDIA RELEASE
Tuesday 14 January
2014
Representation Commission
Te
Komihana Whakatau Rohe Pōti
409 Objections to Proposed Electorate Boundaries
The Representation Commission has received 409 objections to proposed electorate boundaries for the next two general elections. Over 1,700 people have contributed through individual, form submissions and petitions.
“Objections include suggestions for electorate name changes and changes to boundaries to reflect their communities of interest. Some objectors want to see the existing electorate boundaries retained,” says Bernard Kendall, Chair of the Representation Commission.
“A summary of the objections is now available for people to make counter-objections,” says Mr Kendall.
People have until 5:00pm, Wednesday 29 January to make counter-objections. Counter-objections can be made online atwww.elections.org.nz, or sent by post, email or fax. The Commission will take the counter-objections into account when deciding the final boundaries.
A summary of the objections can be viewed online at www.elections.org.nz/events/electorate-boundary-review/objections-proposed-boundaries or printed copies can be viewed at libraries, Registrar of Electors’ offices, Council offices or Council service centres, Te Puni Kōkiri regional offices, Māori Land Court offices and Rūnanga offices.
Electorates that have
generated the most comment include:
•
Mt Roskill with 128
objections including two form submissions from 600 people
and one petition with 38 signatures. The majority of
objections oppose an area within the existing Epsom
electorate moving into the Mt Roskill electorate.
•
Maungakiekie with 24
objections mainly opposed to the proposed boundary with the
Tāmaki electorate around Stonefields.
•
Helensville with 37
objections most of which oppose the geographic size of the
electorate and the wide range of communities to be
represented.
• Mt
Albert with 17 objections opposed to the splitting
of Grey Lynn from Auckland Central.
•
Kelston with 16
objections mainly opposed to the inclusion of the Te Atatu
South area in the Kelston electorate rather than the Te
Atatū electorate. There are also objections about the
inclusion of Waterview in Kelston.
•
New Lynn with six
objections including two petitions with over 180 signatures,
opposed to the transfer of population from Mt Roskill to New
Lynn and changes that split the New Lynn community.
•
Taranaki-King
Country with 25 objections mainly opposed to the
inclusion of Temple View, which is currently in the Hamilton
West electorate.
• Port
Hills with 19 objections including one petition
with over 60 signatures, opposed to the Halswell area moving
from the existing Selwyn electorate into the Port Hills
electorate. A number of objectors suggested it should be
named ‘Banks Peninsula’.
•
Christchurch
Central with 15 objections including a petition
with over 20 signatures, opposed to the northern boundary
with the Waimakariri electorate. A number of objectors
suggest it should be named ‘Avon’ or
‘Ōtākaro’.
•
Christchurch East with
11 objections including one petition with over 200
signatures, opposed to the inclusion of the Bromley area in
the Port Hills electorate. There are also objections to
the proposal to move Mairehau and part of St Albans from
Christchurch Central to Christchurch East.
•
Selwyn with 10
objections including one petition with 180 signatures,
opposed to the communities of Hornby, Islington and Hei Hei
moving into Selwyn from Wigram and two objections about
Rakaia moving into Selwyn from Rangitata.
409 objections compares with 331 objections received when the boundaries were last redrawn in 2007.
The Representation Commission plans to hold public hearings between 10 and 19 February. The final boundaries will be released on 17 April.
ENDS