Walking and the Election
Walking and the Election
The Green Party has topped
the polls while National has failed to register according to
NZ's pedestrian advocacy organisation Living Streets
Aotearoa (LSA).
LSA recently asked each party
represented in the current Parliament 7 questions to find
out which parties would do things to make life better for
pedestrians.
Andy Smith, President of LSA, says the
responses were quite revealing with the Green Party clearly
out in front while the Maori Party also showed a strong
commitment to making walking more convenient, appealing and
safer.
Mana was also strong and would have scored more
strongly had it had some original ideas for actions to
benefit walkers.
Labour seemed to be speaking the
right language but was a bit too non-committal, using lots
of phrases like 'We'll investigate/review...'.
In
contrast, NZ First was definitive but brief in its answers
offering no elaboration.
United Future came in next,
suffering from too many weasel words and wanting to leave
too much up to local authorities, which is the partly the
current cause of poor provision for pedestrians and why the
standard is so variable around the country.
ACT came
in very lowly, saying everything would be according to the
market - supply and demand - which really told us
nothing.
But at the bottom of the heap was National
which declined to even answer our questions.
Andy
Smith stressed that even though only 7% of people who left
home to go to work on census day used walking as their main
mode of transport, many times more would have done so to get
to their ferry, train or bus or to or from their motor
vehicle. Additionally, large numbers of school children walk
to and from school and during the day many other
people walk for all sorts of purposes from shopping
to exercise. So nearly everyone who leaves home each day is
a pedestrian at some stage on their daily journeys and
politicians should allocate adequate resources and implement
appropriate laws to make this mode safe, convenient and
appealing. Besides all its health and environmental
benefits, it would bring added vitality and economic
activity to our towns and cities.
Living Streets
applauds the recent financial commitments being made to
cycling in New Zealand but points out that far more people
walk each day than cycle and that resources should be
allocated to ensure both these sustainable, active modes are
made easy.
See the questions and the parties'
responses on our election page
http://www.livingstreets.org.nz/node/4880
ends